via University of Waterloo
Researchers from universities of Waterloo, Toronto, Yale, UPenn discuss AI and its application to their work
In an article published yesterday in the prestigious journal Science, leading researchers from the University of Waterloo, University of Toronto, Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania look at how AI (large language models or LLMs in particular) could change the nature of their work.
“What we wanted to explore in this article is how social science research practices can be adapted, even reinvented, to harness the power of AI,” said Igor Grossmann, professor of psychology at Waterloo.
Grossmann and colleagues note that large language models trained on vast amounts of text data are increasingly capable of simulating human-like responses and behaviours. This offers novel opportunities for testing theories and hypotheses about human behaviour at great scale and speed.
Traditionally, social sciences rely on a range of methods, including questionnaires, behavioral tests, observational studies, and experiments. A common goal in social science research is to obtain a generalized representation of characteristics of individuals, groups, cultures, and their dynamics. With the advent of advanced AI systems, the landscape of data collection in social sciences may shift.
“AI models can represent a vast array of human experiences and perspectives, possibly giving them a higher degree of freedom to generate diverse responses than conventional human participant methods, which can help to reduce generalizability concerns in research,” said Grossmann.
“LLMs might supplant human participants for data collection,” said UPenn psychology professor Philip Tetlock. “In fact, LLMs have already demonstrated their ability to generate realistic survey responses concerning consumer behaviour. Large language models will revolutionize human-based forecasting in the next 3 years. It won’t make sense for humans unassisted by AIs to venture probabilistic judgments in serious policy debates. I put an 90% chance on that. Of course, how humans react to all of that is another matter.”
While opinions on the feasibility of this application of advanced AI systems vary, studies using simulated participants could be used to generate novel hypotheses that could then be confirmed in human populations.
But the researchers warn of some of the possible pitfalls in this approach – including the fact that LLMs are often trained to exclude socio-cultural biases that exist for real-life humans. This means that sociologists using AI in this way couldn’t study those biases.
Professor Dawn Parker, a co-author on the article from the University of Waterloo, notes that researchers will need to establish guidelines for the governance of LLMs in research.
“Pragmatic concerns with data quality, fairness, and equity of access to the powerful AI systems will be substantial,” Parker said. “So, we must ensure that social science LLMs, like all scientific models, are open-source, meaning that their algorithms and ideally data are available to all to scrutinize, test, and modify. Only by maintaining transparency and replicability can we ensure that AI-assisted social science research truly contributes to our understanding of human experience.”
Original Article: AI could replace humans in social science research
More from: University of Waterloo | University of Toronto | Yale University | University of Pennsylvania
The Latest Updates from Bing News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
AI social science research
- How to Hit Pause on AI Before It's Too Late
The time bomb that is AI isn't as hard to stop as many think, while we better understand its civilizational risks.
- This Week in AI: OpenAI moves away from safety
Keeping up with an industry as fast-moving as AI is a tall order. So until an AI can do it for you, here’s a handy roundup of recent stories in the world of machine learning, along with notable ...
- Former OpenAI leader says safety has 'taken a backseat to shiny products' at the AI company
wrote in a series of posts on the social media platform X that he joined the San Francisco-based company because he thought it would be the best place to do AI research. "However, I have been ...
- OpenAI’s Long-Term AI Risk Team Has Disbanded
The entire OpenAI team focused on the existential dangers of AI has either resigned or been absorbed into other research groups, WIRED has confirmed.
- How AI And Technology Can Impact Mental Health Care
AI has the potential to offer better, more accessible and personalized solutions for mental health care. However, these apps are not a substitute for professional care, and more work and research are ...
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Social science LLMs
- LLMs can be easily manipulated for malicious purposes, research finds
Researchers at AWS AI Labs, found that most publicly available LLMs can be easily manipulated into revealing harmful or unethical info.
- How Does ChatGPT Think?
Researchers are striving to reverse-engineer artificial intelligence and scan the “brains” of LLMs to deduce the how any why of that they are doing ...
- Researchers find LLMs are easy to manipulate into giving harmful information
A team of AI researchers at AWS AI Labs, Amazon, has found that most, if not all, publicly available Large Language Models (LLMs) can be easily tricked into revealing dangerous or unethical ...
- 8 Ethical Challenges For Generative AI
The rapid advancement of generative AI technologies over the past year marks a significant leap in technological progress.
- Cerebras and Neural Magic Collaborate to Accelerate Sparse Training and Deployment of LLMs
Achieving an unprecedented 70% parameter reduction with full accuracy recovery, training on Cerebras CS-3 systems and deploying on Neural Magic inference server solutions enables significantly faster, ...