Since 1955, The Journal of Irreproducible Results has offered “spoofs, parodies, whimsies, burlesques, lampoons and satires” about life in the laboratory.
Among its greatest hits: “Acoustic Oscillations in Jell-O, With and Without Fruit, Subjected to Varying Levels of Stress” and “Utilizing Infinite Loops to Compute an Approximate Value of Infinity.” The good-natured jibes are a backhanded celebration of science. What really goes on in the lab is, by implication, of a loftier, more serious nature.
It has been jarring to learn in recent years that a reproducible result may actually be the rarest of birds. Replication, the ability of another lab to reproduce a finding, is the gold standard of science, reassurance that you have discovered something true. But that is getting harder all the time. With the most accessible truths already discovered, what remains are often subtle effects, some so delicate that they can be conjured up only under ideal circumstances, using highly specialized techniques.
Fears that this is resulting in some questionable findings began to emerge in 2005, when Dr. John P. A. Ioannidis, a kind of meta-scientist who researches research, wrote a paper pointedly titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.”
Given the desire for ambitious scientists to break from the pack with a striking new finding, Dr. Ioannidis reasoned, many hypotheses already start with a high chance of being wrong. Otherwise proving them right would not be so difficult and surprising — and supportive of a scientist’s career. Taking into account the human tendency to see what we want to see, unconscious bias is inevitable. Without any ill intent, a scientist may be nudged toward interpreting the data so it supports the hypothesis, even if just barely.
The effect is amplified by competition for a shrinking pool of grant money and also by the design of so many experiments — with small sample sizes (cells in a lab dish or people in an epidemiological pool) and weak standards for what passes as statistically significant. That makes it all the easier to fool oneself.
Paradoxically the hottest fields, with the most people pursuing the same questions, are most prone to error, Dr. Ioannidis argued. If one of five competing labs is alone in finding an effect, that result is the one likely to be published. But there is a four in five chance that it is wrong. Papers reporting negative conclusions are more easily ignored.
Putting all of this together, Dr. Ioannidis devised a mathematical model supporting the conclusion that most published findings are probably incorrect.
The Latest on: Research results
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Research results” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Research results
- 2024 UH Faculty Awards Recognize Teaching, Research, Serviceon April 26, 2024 at 8:38 am
This week, UH celebrated the efforts of those professors who have gone above and beyond their roles as educators in demonstrating a commitment to both campus and community. The 2024 Faculty Awards ...
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is wrong about a ban on NIH research about mass shootingson April 26, 2024 at 7:08 am
CDC, NIH, and other federal agencies have funded millions of dollars in gun-related research, including studies on mass shootings.
- Insights From Research of Teens Unhappy With Their Genderon April 26, 2024 at 6:04 am
Objective information is lacking about basic demographics of adolescents unhappy with their gender. Two new studies reveal a sizable number of early adolescents experience dissatisfaction with their ...
- Scientists inspired the right guardrails for nuclear energy, the internet, and DNA research. Let them do the same for AIon April 26, 2024 at 5:53 am
Like with other tech that exposed humanity to possible annihilation, a Pugwash conference for AI scientists is urgently needed.
- ‘Self-driving labs.’ Scientists at PNNL explore how AI can help transform researchon April 26, 2024 at 5:00 am
Researchers at the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory are exploring the frontiers of artificial intelligence, or AI, to quickly find solutions that can transform these fields ...
- Columbia research assistant reacts to ongoing protests: 'It's been a nightmare'on April 26, 2024 at 4:49 am
Columbia University research assistant Omer Lubaton Granot on the upcoming rally to bring Israeli voices to the school, advocating to bring home hostages and asking for peace and respect.
- Spencer Torkelson drops clothing collection, supports Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundationon April 26, 2024 at 3:11 am
KiwiClo, a Detroit-based clothing brand, is dropping a limited collection in collaboration with Detroit Tigers first baseman Spencer Torkelson.
- Defence giant lodges plans for research facilityon April 26, 2024 at 1:59 am
A defence giant's new research facility would support the design and building of "the most advanced submarines ever operated by the Royal Navy". BAE Systems has lodged plans to build Project Spartan, ...
- Future of Humanity Institute shuts: what's next for ‘deep future’ research?on April 25, 2024 at 5:00 pm
Some future shocks are hard to avoid — as researchers at the 19-year-old Future of Humanity Institute (FHI) at the University of Oxford, UK, discovered last week, when the institute was shut down in ...
- WVU research explores potential health benefits of rampson April 25, 2024 at 4:41 pm
With the National Institutes of Health reporting that West Virginians have some of the highest blood pressure in the country, research at WVU is looking to show how the answer to that problem may be ...
via Bing News