Since 1955, The Journal of Irreproducible Results has offered “spoofs, parodies, whimsies, burlesques, lampoons and satires” about life in the laboratory.
Among its greatest hits: “Acoustic Oscillations in Jell-O, With and Without Fruit, Subjected to Varying Levels of Stress” and “Utilizing Infinite Loops to Compute an Approximate Value of Infinity.” The good-natured jibes are a backhanded celebration of science. What really goes on in the lab is, by implication, of a loftier, more serious nature.
It has been jarring to learn in recent years that a reproducible result may actually be the rarest of birds. Replication, the ability of another lab to reproduce a finding, is the gold standard of science, reassurance that you have discovered something true. But that is getting harder all the time. With the most accessible truths already discovered, what remains are often subtle effects, some so delicate that they can be conjured up only under ideal circumstances, using highly specialized techniques.
Fears that this is resulting in some questionable findings began to emerge in 2005, when Dr. John P. A. Ioannidis, a kind of meta-scientist who researches research, wrote a paper pointedly titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.”
Given the desire for ambitious scientists to break from the pack with a striking new finding, Dr. Ioannidis reasoned, many hypotheses already start with a high chance of being wrong. Otherwise proving them right would not be so difficult and surprising — and supportive of a scientist’s career. Taking into account the human tendency to see what we want to see, unconscious bias is inevitable. Without any ill intent, a scientist may be nudged toward interpreting the data so it supports the hypothesis, even if just barely.
The effect is amplified by competition for a shrinking pool of grant money and also by the design of so many experiments — with small sample sizes (cells in a lab dish or people in an epidemiological pool) and weak standards for what passes as statistically significant. That makes it all the easier to fool oneself.
Paradoxically the hottest fields, with the most people pursuing the same questions, are most prone to error, Dr. Ioannidis argued. If one of five competing labs is alone in finding an effect, that result is the one likely to be published. But there is a four in five chance that it is wrong. Papers reporting negative conclusions are more easily ignored.
Putting all of this together, Dr. Ioannidis devised a mathematical model supporting the conclusion that most published findings are probably incorrect.
The Latest on: Research results
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Research results” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Research results
- A $1 million wealth gap now divides white families from Black and Hispanic ones, research showson April 25, 2024 at 9:00 am
The average wealth gap between white families and Black and Hispanic ones reached a new high in 2022, topping $1 million in household wealth, according to a new report. New research by the Urban ...
- Transgender Athletes Could Be At A Physical Disadvantage, New Research Showson April 25, 2024 at 7:48 am
An IOC-funded study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine earlier this month suggests transgender athletes could be at a physical disadvantage.
- New Research Reveals Influencers Significantly Drive Purchasing Decisionson April 25, 2024 at 6:57 am
The report surveyed 2,000 consumers and 300 influencers to uncover their influencer marketing perspectives today and predict how the landscape will evolve in the future. The findings illustrate how ...
- MGB expands effort to make medical research more sustainableon April 25, 2024 at 2:46 am
The state's largest hospital network is expanding an effort to make its vast laboratory research network more environmentally friendly.
- NATO is boosting AI and climate research as scientific diplomacy remains on iceon April 24, 2024 at 5:00 pm
As the military alliance created to counter the Soviet Union expands, it is prioritizing studies on how climate change affects security, cyber attacks and election interference.
- Just how close are MIT and other universities to Israel? Protesting students want schools to cut research ties.on April 24, 2024 at 4:24 pm
Students' allegations included that the school receives money from the Israeli Ministry of Defense for research.
- New Research Points to Violent Origin of Enigmatic Earth 'Quasi-Moon'on April 24, 2024 at 2:50 pm
The Giordano Bruno crater, located on the far side of the Moon and spanning 13.6 miles (21.9 kilometers) in width, is believed to have formed between 1 to 10 million years ago. It was considered an ...
- Maria Shriver talks teaming with Jill Biden to push for gender equity in medical research: It’s not political, it’s a ‘human issue’on April 24, 2024 at 12:53 pm
Maria Shriver says her work toward gender equity in medical research is a “human issue,” not a political one. “I don’t see it as partisan at all because there are Republican women serving. Republican ...
- Lawmakers put up $26 million to fund 'bleeding edge' hypersonic research at Embry-Riddleon April 24, 2024 at 5:21 am
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, in partnership with UCF, has landed a $26 million state appropriation for a hypersonic research facility.
- Research: Why People Really Buy Upcycled Productson April 24, 2024 at 5:15 am
Researchers who analyzed consumer feedback from Etsy discovered that what consumers value most about upcycled products is not their sustainability but their creativity. Their findings offer some ...
via Bing News