A new artificial intelligence system called a semantic decoder can translate a person’s brain activity — while listening to a story or silently imagining telling a story — into a continuous stream of text.
Illustration credit: Jerry Tang/Martha Morales/The University of Texas at Austin.
A new artificial intelligence system called a semantic decoder can translate a person’s brain activity — while listening to a story or silently imagining telling a story — into a continuous stream of text.
The system developed by researchers at The University of Texas at Austin might help people who are mentally conscious yet unable to physically speak, such as those debilitated by strokes, to communicate intelligibly again.
The study, published in the journal Nature Neuroscience, was led by Jerry Tang, a doctoral student in computer science, and Alex Huth, an assistant professor of neuroscience and computer science at UT Austin. The work relies in part on a transformer model, similar to the ones that power Open AI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard.
Unlike other language decoding systems in development, this system does not require subjects to have surgical implants, making the process noninvasive. Participants also do not need to use only words from a prescribed list. Brain activity is measured using an fMRI scanner after extensive training of the decoder, in which the individual listens to hours of podcasts in the scanner. Later, provided that the participant is open to having their thoughts decoded, their listening to a new story or imagining telling a story allows the machine to generate corresponding text from brain activity alone.
“For a noninvasive method, this is a real leap forward compared to what’s been done before, which is typically single words or short sentences,” Huth said. “We’re getting the model to decode continuous language for extended periods of time with complicated ideas.”
The result is not a word-for-word transcript. Instead, researchers designed it to capture the gist of what is being said or thought, albeit imperfectly. About half the time, when the decoder has been trained to monitor a participant’s brain activity, the machine produces text that closely (and sometimes precisely) matches the intended meanings of the original words.
For example, in experiments, a participant listening to a speaker say, “I don’t have my driver’s license yet” had their thoughts translated as, “She has not even started to learn to drive yet.” Listening to the words, “I didn’t know whether to scream, cry or run away. Instead, I said, ‘Leave me alone!’” was decoded as, “Started to scream and cry, and then she just said, ‘I told you to leave me alone.’”
Beginning with an earlier version of the paper that appeared as a preprint online, the researchers addressed questions about potential misuse of the technology. The paper describes how decoding worked only with cooperative participants who had participated willingly in training the decoder. Results for individuals on whom the decoder had not been trained were unintelligible, and if participants on whom the decoder had been trained later put up resistance — for example, by thinking other thoughts — results were similarly unusable.
“We take very seriously the concerns that it could be used for bad purposes and have worked to avoid that,” Tang said. “We want to make sure people only use these types of technologies when they want to and that it helps them.”
In addition to having participants listen or think about stories, the researchers asked subjects to watch four short, silent videos while in the scanner. The semantic decoder was able to use their brain activity to accurately describe certain events from the videos.
The system currently is not practical for use outside of the laboratory because of its reliance on the time need on an fMRI machine. But the researchers think this work could transfer to other, more portable brain-imaging systems, such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
“fNIRS measures where there’s more or less blood flow in the brain at different points in time, which, it turns out, is exactly the same kind of signal that fMRI is measuring,” Huth said. “So, our exact kind of approach should translate to fNIRS,” although, he noted, the resolution with fNIRS would be lower.
Original Article: Brain Activity Decoder Can Reveal Stories in People’s Minds
More from: University of Texas at Austin
The Latest Updates from Bing News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Semantic decoder
- Meta, Apple are investing in tech that can decode your thoughts
AI can now decode your brain activity—a fancy way of saying mind reading. Big tech companies like Meta (META) are backing research into this field, including products that can decode thoughts without ...
- Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) Is Powering Semantic SEO
Terms may apply to offers listed on this page. Search engines are improving the way they interpret content via methods such as semantic indexing. Understanding how it works can help you target ...
- MediaTek launches flagship Dimensity 9300+ chipset with AI support: All the details
Features Cortex-X4 core, NeuroPilot Speculative Decode Acceleration technology ... The ISP has a built-in AI Semantic Analysis Video Engine to support advanced AI videography features including 16 ...
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ Launched
Dimensity 9300+ includes MediaTek's MiraVision 990 display technology, which uses AI depth engine technologies to improve content viewing ...
- New AV1 software decoder coming to Android promises improved video experience
Arif Dikici, Google's manager responsible for video and image codecs on Android, recently confirmed that the mobile operating system is getting an official, software-based AV1 decoder. Mountain ...
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Mind reading technology
- Scientists invent new technology that can read minds with shocking accuracy
Caltech scientists unveil a revolutionary brain-machine interface that decodes thoughts into text with exceptional precision, offering hope for speech-impaired individuals and new avenues for ...
- Connecting the mind and body
Harnessing the potential of mind is the key to true happiness What is the difference between PK and PIKU? Two letters, ‘I’ and ‘U;’ I is us and U are them (an extra-terrestrial Aamir Khan). Their CPU ...
- MIT Technology Review
Here are four things to bear in mind as we wrap our heads around what's coming. Researchers are using generative AI and other techniques to teach robots new skills—including tasks they could perform ...
- Mind Reading
Several psychiatric and behavioral disorders, like autism and ADHD, make reading the thoughts and feelings of others a challenge.Although people with autism and ADHD don’t routinely lack empathy ...
- Promising new brain-reading tech can decode internal speech, but can it give Musk’s Neuralink a run for its money?
As with any powerful technology, mind-reading raises ethical concerns. Issues like privacy and security need to be carefully addressed to ensure this technology is used responsibly. There are key ...