A program to reduce Earth’s heat capture by injecting aerosols into the atmosphere from high-altitude aircraft is possible, but unreasonably costly with current technology, and would be unlikely to remain secret.
Those are the key findings of new research published today in Environmental Research Letters, which looked at the capabilities and costs of various methods of delivering sulphates into the lower stratosphere, known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI).
The researchers examined the costs and practicalities of a large scale, hypothetical ‘solar geoengineering’ project beginning 15 years from now. Its aim would be to halve the increase in anthropogenic radiative forcing, by deploying material to altitudes of around 20 kilometres.
They also discussed whether such an idealized program could be kept secret.
Dr Gernot Wagner, from Harvard University’s John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, is a co-author of the study. He said: “Solar geoengineering is often described as ‘fast, cheap, and imperfect’.
“While we don’t make any judgement about the desirability of SAI, we do show that a hypothetical deployment program starting 15 years from now, while both highly uncertain and ambitious, would be technically possible strictly from an engineering perspective. It would also be remarkably inexpensive, at an average of around $2 to 2.5 billion per year over the first 15 years.”
The researchers confirm earlier studies that discuss the low direct costs of potential stratospheric aerosol geoengineering intervention, but they arrive at those numbers with the help of direct input from aerospace engineering companies in specifying what the paper dubs the ‘SAI Lofter (SAIL)’.
Wake Smith, a co-author of the study, is a lecturer at Yale College and held former positions as CEO of Pemco World Air Services (a leading aircraft modification company), COO of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings (a global cargo airline), and President of the flight training division of Boeing. He said: “I became intrigued by the engineering questions around SAI and the many studies that purport to show that modified existing planes could do the job. Turns out that is not so. It would indeed take an entirely new plane design to do SAI under reasonable albeit entirely hypothetical parameters. No existing aircraft has the combination of altitude and payload capabilities required.”
Mr. Smith said: “We developed the specifications for SAIL with direct input from several aerospace and engine companies. It’s equivalent in weight to a large narrow body passenger aircraft. But to sustain level flight at 20 kms, it needs roughly double the wing area of an equivalently sized airliner, and double the thrust, with four engines instead of two.
“At the same time, its fuselage would be stubby and narrow, sized to accommodate a heavy but dense mass of molten sulphur rather than the large volume of space and air required for passengers.”
The team estimated the total development costs at less than $2 billion for the airframe, and a further $350 million for modifying existing low-bypass engines.
The new planes would comprise a fleet of eight in the first year, rising to a fleet of just under 100 within 15 years. The fleet would fly just over 4,000 missions a year in year one, rising to just over 60,000 per year by year 15.
Dr Wagner said: “Given the potential benefits of halving average projected increases in radiative forcing from a particular date onward, these numbers invoke the ‘incredible economics’ of solar geoengineering. Dozens of countries could fund such a program, and the required technology is not particularly exotic.”
However, in the authors’ view, this should not reinforce the often-invoked fear that a rogue country or operator might launch a clandestine SAI program upon an unsuspecting world.
Mr Smith said: “No global SAI program of the scale and nature discussed here could reasonably expect to maintain secrecy. Even our hypothesized Year one deployment program entails 4000 flights at unusually high altitudes by airliner-sized aircraft in multiple flight corridors in both hemispheres. This is far too much aviation activity to remain undetected, and once detected, such a program could be deterred.”
Learn more: Could an anti-global warming atmospheric spraying program really work?
The Latest on: Stratospheric aerosol injection
[google_news title=”” keyword=”stratospheric aerosol injection” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Stratospheric aerosol injection
- BEHIND THE HEADLINES - Dimming the sun to cool the earth: Is solar geoengineering the future?on May 8, 2024 at 6:52 am
There are lots of reasons to be skeptical about geoengineering technology. Nonetheless, many scientists agree that research into the subject remains necessary.
- Warning that solar geoengineering could cause unexpected regional heatingon May 1, 2024 at 1:30 am
Depending on who you ask, solar geoengineering is seen as a threat to meaningful climate action, a remote fallback, or an essential piece of the puzzle. What most people can agree on is that we don’t ...
- A Beginner's Guide to Geoengineeringon May 1, 2024 at 12:19 am
Here is a brief overview of the most popular SRM techniques. Stratospheric aerosol injections involve spraying aerosols high up into the stratosphere to mimic the cooling effect of large volcanic ...
- Cloud control: Humanity’s never-ending quest to control the weatheron April 29, 2024 at 6:53 am
For over a century, we’ve turned to technology in an attempt to control the weather. Are today’s geoengineering proposals any better?
- Controversial methods to cool Earth gain traction as global temps skyrocketon April 26, 2024 at 2:20 pm
Relatively untouched ideas are gaining momentum as potential short-term solutions to lower Earth's temperature.
- Solar geoengineering to cool the planet: Is it worth the risks?on April 24, 2024 at 5:00 pm
Most research into solar geoengineering strategies is currently focused on stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI, also called solar radiation management or SRM) and marine cloud brightening ...
- New scientific interventions are here to fight climate change. But they aren’t silver bulletson April 22, 2024 at 3:33 am
But perhaps the most promising — or at least the most studied — geoengineering solution is known as stratospheric aerosol injections. The basic idea is to manually re-create the process of ...
- Startups want to cool Earth by reflecting sunlight. There are few rules and big riskson April 21, 2024 at 12:01 pm
"We don't know almost everything else." The type of solar geoengineering Make Sunsets works on is often called "stratospheric aerosol injection," and much of what's known about how it could work comes ...
- Letter to the editor: Legacy space debris contaminates stratospheric aerosolson April 9, 2024 at 5:00 pm
Over 170 million pieces of space junk pose spacecraft navigational risks in low-earth orbit (LEO). About 30% of all cataloged debris result from two “fragmentation events.” First happens with ...
via Bing News