Bars show sustained reduction in annual CO2 emissions necessary to equal cumulative reduction in radiative forcing, a measure of the instantaneous warming potential of the atmosphere, of the given scenario in 2050 (blue) and 2100 (orange).
CREDIT: Eisen and Brown, 2022, CC-BY 4.0
Combined effects of biomass recovery and reduced emissions from livestock could significantly impede climate change
A new model suggests a global switch from an animal-based to a plant-based diet would have a substantial impact in stabilizing greenhouse gas levels, equivalent to a significant reduction in CO2 emissions. Michael Eisen of the University of California, Berkeley and Patrick Brown of Stanford University and Impossible Foods present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS Climate on February 1, 2022.
Animal agriculture contributes significantly to global warming because of the methane, nitrous oxide and carbon emissions of livestock and their supply chains, and because carbon-sequestering biomass is often displaced on land used for grazing and for growing animal feed. But unlike emissions from fossil fuel combustion, the emissions from animal agriculture would be largely reversible as that industry diminishes, through biomass recovery on land previously cleared for livestock and spontaneous decay of methane and nitrous oxide. This means that replacement of animals in the global food system could help to put the brakes on climate change.
The authors of the present study use a simple climate model to incorporate the combined effects of reduced emissions and biomass recovery resulting from a global switch to a plant-based diet. Using publicly available data, they examine how this change might affect emissions between 2020 and 2100, relative to current baseline emissions, under scenarios including an immediate switch from animal- to plant-based agriculture, a 15-year phased transition, and a partial change where only certain animal products were phased out.
In this analysis, switching to plant-based agriculture could reduce emissions by the equivalent of 25 gigatons of carbon dioxide per year. A 15-year phased transition could reduce emissions sufficiently to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years. Impacts of phasing out animal-based agriculture differed greatly by species, with cattle accounting for 71 percent of the benefits to emissions (47 percent through beef and 24 percent through milk). While fully phasing out animal-based agriculture was projected to have the largest impact, replacing ruminants alone could achieve over 90 percent of the reduction in emissions.
The researchers’ model is based on a number of simplifying assumptions. Current greenhouse gas emissions levels form the baseline for both present-day and future projections, whereas baseline emissions may in fact change as technology advances, nations develop and populations evolve. In addition, the researchers made assumptions about the fate of land currently used for animal-based agriculture which would be surplus relative to demand for meat. The validity of such assumptions would affect the extent to which these conclusions would hold if applied in the real world.
The model does not consider the viability – in terms of geographic, cultural and nutritional constraints – of switching to plant-based agriculture worldwide, and some regions, such as the drylands of sub-Saharan Africa, may be unsuitable for culturing crops. Also, the analysis focuses on terrestrial agriculture, excluding aquaculture and fishing.
The authors hope that their work in clarifying the “climate opportunity cost” of animal agriculture “will help policymakers and the public properly prioritize dietary change as a climate defense strategy”.
Mike Eisen notes: “This study shows that a global transition away from the use of animals, especially cattle, to produce food has the potential to rapidly remove large amounts of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide from the atmosphere, representing a unique opportunity to achieve the negative emissions required to keep temperatures from exceeding 2C.”
Original Article: Phasing out animal agriculture could potentially stabilize greenhouse gas levels for decades, according to new model
More from: University of California Berkeley | Stanford University
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Reduced emissions from livestock
- New rules on livestock emissions enter into force this weekend
The updated EU directive on industrial and livestock rearing emissions will enter into force this Sunday, August 4, revising the former IED.
- Flower power: Daffodils could cut livestock methane emissions
AgrizeroNZ is partnering with Welsh company Agroceutical Products, trialling the use of daffodil extract to cut the methane emissions from livestock.
- A gas tax on livestock? What one country is doing to cut greenhouse gas emissions
Denmark is poised to become the first country in the world to put a tax on farm animals like cattle, pigs and other ruminants in an effort to shave climate emissions. The country’s aim is to reduce ...
- Understanding how a red seaweed reduces methane emissions from cows
Methane is the second-largest contributor to climate warming after carbon dioxide, and so scientists have put a lot of attention toward addressing one of the top sources: methane emissions from ...
- GHG Emissions From Cows, Livestock Are More Potent Than Cars, Per EPA
Cows and other livestock might not produce the CO2 that cars do, but their methane production is seriously harmful.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Reduced emissions from livestock
[google_news title=”” keyword=”reduced emissions from livestock” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Phaseout of animal agriculture
- ‘Bending to the whims of inner city ideology’
The CEO at the helm of one of Australia’s leading agribusinesses has given the federal government a clip, following its controversial phase out of live sheep exports.
- Extended drought parches Sicily, and farmers worry about being forced to sell off animals
Crippling drought from a nearly rainless year, along with record-high temperatures, is stressing farmers on the Italian island of Sicily.
- Accuracy of anti-live export paper challenged
An academic report aiming to highlight the disproportionate “power of big meat” has taken aim at Australia’s live export industry claiming that it has used its influence to still exist...Read More ...
- Sonoma County is going head-to-head with CAFO producers. Here’s why.
Measure J is an initiative that was introduced in Sonoma County, California, to phase out “large CAFOs” within three years, totaling around two-dozen farms.
- Animal waste fertilizer conversion program debuts
The N.C. Foundation for Soil & Water Conservation has announced the launch of a new Fertilizer Conversion Cost Share Program funded by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Phaseout of animal agriculture
[google_news title=”” keyword=”phaseout of animal agriculture” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]