Machine algorithm uses 85 variables to calculate risk in individuals Formulas used by humans include a handful of variables and have modest accuracy
By repeatedly analysing 85 variables in 950 patients with known six-year outcomes, an algorithm “learned” how imaging data interacts. It then identified patterns correlating the variables to death and heart attack with more than 90% accuracy.
Machine learning, the modern bedrock of artificial intelligence (AI), is used every day. Google’s search engine, face recognition on smartphones, self-driving cars, Netflix and Spotify recommendation systems all use machine learning algorithms to adapt to the individual user.
Study author Dr Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco, of the Turku PET Centre, Finland, said: “These advances are far beyond what has been done in medicine, where we need to be cautious about how we evaluate risk and outcomes. We have the data but we are not using it to its full potential yet.”
Doctors use risk scores to make treatment decisions. But these scores are based on just a handful of variables and often have modest accuracy in individual patients. Through repetition and adjustment, machine learning can exploit large amounts of data and identify complex patterns that may not be evident to humans.
Dr Juarez-Orozco explained: “Humans have a very hard time thinking further than three dimensions (a cube) or four dimensions (a cube through time). The moment we jump into the fifth dimension we’re lost. Our study shows that very high dimensional patterns are more useful than single dimensional patterns to predict outcomes in individuals and for that we need machine learning.”
The study enrolled 950 patients with chest pain who underwent the centre’s usual protocol to look for coronary artery disease. A coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) scan yielded 58 pieces of data on presence of coronary plaque, vessel narrowing, and calcification. Those with scans suggestive of disease underwent a positron emission tomography (PET) scan which produced 17 variables on blood flow. Ten clinical variables were obtained from medical records including sex, age, smoking and diabetes.
During an average six-year follow-up there were 24 heart attacks and 49 deaths from any cause. The 85 variables were entered into a machine learning algorithm called LogitBoost, which analysed them over and over again until it found the best structure to predict who had a heart attack or died.
Dr Juarez-Orozco said: “The algorithm progressively learns from the data and after numerous rounds of analyses, it figures out the high dimensional patterns that should be used to efficiently identify patients who have the event. The result is a score of individual risk.”
The predictive performance using the ten clinical variables alone (similar to current clinical practice) was modest, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.65 (where 1.0 is a perfect test and 0.5 is a random result). When PET data were added, AUC increased to 0.69. The predictive performance increased significantly (p=0.005) when CCTA data were added to clinical and PET data, giving an AUC 0.82 and more than 90% accuracy.
Dr Juarez-Orozco said: “Doctors already collect a lot of information about patients – for example those with chest pain. We found that machine learning can integrate these data and accurately predict individual risk. This should allow us to personalise treatment and ultimately lead to better outcomes for patients.”
Learn more: Machine learning overtakes humans in predicting death or heart attack
The Latest on: Machine learning predictions
[google_news title=”” keyword=”machine learning predictions” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Machine learning predictions
- Machine Learning Takes the Stage at TC Sessions: Robotics+AIon May 8, 2024 at 2:00 pm
The roots of machine learning go back at least to 1962, when Doug Engelbart of the Stanford Research Institute argued that computers could play a role in augmenting the human intellect. Outlandish at ...
- Machine learning engineer salary: How much do AI techs make?on May 7, 2024 at 4:02 pm
Machine learning engineers tend to be among the highest-paid employees in tech. Here’s how much they make and which companies pay the most.
- Biomarkers + patient-reported outcomes up prediction of interstitial cystitison May 7, 2024 at 10:52 am
The integration of biomarkers and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) improves prediction of interstitial cystitis (IC)/bladder pain syndrome, according to a study published online April 24 in Urology.
- Learning Rateon May 7, 2024 at 2:50 am
Learning rate is the rate at which a model's weights are changed when training a model’s parameters. Techopedia explains the full meaning here.
- Crypto Price Prediction: AI Tokens Capitalize on Market Optimism as $BTC Breaks $65Kon May 6, 2024 at 5:11 am
The first week of May has been notably bullish for the crypto market following the Bitcoin price recovery from $56500 to $65223.
- Border States Enlists GAINS for AI Lead Time Predictionon May 5, 2024 at 10:43 am
To improve lead time accuracy, Border States electrical supplies distributor will implement a AI-based prediction tool.
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Unplanned Hospital Utilization and Chemotherapy Management From Patient-Reported Outcome Measureson April 26, 2024 at 1:21 pm
The authors plan to involve patients and clinicians to assess their attitudes to ML-based prediction in their future work ... logistic regression; ML, machine learning; NN, neural network; PROMs, ...
- 3 Machine Learning Stocks That Could Triple Your Money by 2030on April 26, 2024 at 3:58 am
InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice & Trading Tips Investing in machine learning (ML) stocks presents an enticing opportunity for ...
- Machine learning model predicts CIS to MS conversion risk: Studyon April 25, 2024 at 10:00 pm
A machine learning model can predict the risk of converting from clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to multiple sclerosis (MS), per a study.
- Advancing medical treatment with causal machine learningon April 25, 2024 at 9:53 pm
Machines can learn not only to make predictions, but also to handle causal relationships. An international research team shows how this could make therapies safer, more efficient, and more ...
via Bing News