Massive global survey reveals ethics preferences and regional differences.
A massive new survey developed by MIT researchers reveals some distinct global preferences concerning the ethics of autonomous vehicles, as well as some regional variations in those preferences.
The survey has global reach and a unique scale, with over 2 million online participants from over 200 countries weighing in on versions of a classic ethical conundrum, the “Trolley Problem.” The problem involves scenarios in which an accident involving a vehicle is imminent, and the vehicle must opt for one of two potentially fatal options. In the case of driverless cars, that might mean swerving toward a couple of people, rather than a large group of bystanders.
“The study is basically trying to understand the kinds of moral decisions that driverless cars might have to resort to,” says Edmond Awad, a postdoc at the MIT Media Lab and lead author of a new paper outlining the results of the project. “We don’t know yet how they should do that.”
Still, Awad adds, “We found that there are three elements that people seem to approve of the most.”
Indeed, the most emphatic global preferences in the survey are for sparing the lives of humans over the lives of other animals; sparing the lives of many people rather than a few; and preserving the lives of the young, rather than older people.
“The main preferences were to some degree universally agreed upon,” Awad notes. “But the degree to which they agree with this or not varies among different groups or countries.” For instance, the researchers found a less pronounced tendency to favor younger people, rather than the elderly, in what they defined as an “eastern” cluster of countries, including many in Asia.
The paper, “The Moral Machine Experiment,” is being published today in Nature.
The authors are Awad; Sohan Dsouza, a doctoral student in the Media Lab; Richard Kim, a research assistant in the Media Lab; Jonathan Schulz, a postdoc at Harvard University; Joseph Henrich, a professor at Harvard; Azim Shariff, an associate professor at the University of British Columbia; Jean-François Bonnefon, a professor at the Toulouse School of Economics; and Iyad Rahwan, an associate professor of media arts and sciences at the Media Lab, and a faculty affiliate in the MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.
Awad is a postdoc in the MIT Media Lab’s Scalable Cooperation group, which is led by Rahwan.
To conduct the survey, the researchers designed what they call “Moral Machine,” a multilingual online game in which participants could state their preferences concerning a series of dilemmas that autonomous vehicles might face. For instance: If it comes right down it, should autonomous vehicles spare the lives of law-abiding bystanders, or, alternately, law-breaking pedestrians who might be jaywalking? (Most people in the survey opted for the former.)
All told, “Moral Machine” compiled nearly 40 million individual decisions from respondents in 233 countries; the survey collected 100 or more responses from 130 countries. The researchers analyzed the data as a whole, while also breaking participants into subgroups defined by age, education, gender, income, and political and religious views. There were 491,921 respondents who offered demographic data.
The scholars did not find marked differences in moral preferences based on these demographic characteristics, but they did find larger “clusters” of moral preferences based on cultural and geographic affiliations. They defined “western,” “eastern,” and “southern” clusters of countries, and found some more pronounced variations along these lines. For instance: Respondents in southern countries had a relatively stronger tendency to favor sparing young people rather than the elderly, especially compared to the eastern cluster.
Awad suggests that acknowledgement of these types of preferences should be a basic part of informing public-sphere discussion of these issues. In all regions, since there is a moderate preference for sparing law-abiding bystanders rather than jaywalkers, knowing these preferences could, in theory, inform the way software is written to control autonomous vehicles.
“The question is whether these differences in preferences will matter in terms of people’s adoption of the new technology when [vehicles] employ a specific rule,” he says.
Rahwan, for his part, notes that “public interest in the platform surpassed our wildest expectations,” allowing the researchers to conduct a survey that raised awareness about automation and ethics while also yielding specific public-opinion information.
“On the one hand, we wanted to provide a simple way for the public to engage in an important societal discussion,” Rahwan says. “On the other hand, we wanted to collect data to identify which factors people think are important for autonomous cars to use in resolving ethical tradeoffs.”
Beyond the results of the survey, Awad suggests, seeking public input about an issue of innovation and public safety should continue to become a larger part of the dialoge surrounding autonomous vehicles.
“What we have tried to do in this project, and what I would hope becomes more common, is to create public engagement in these sorts of decisions,” Awad says.
Learn more: How should autonomous vehicles be programmed?
The Latest on: Ethics of autonomous vehicles
[google_news title=”” keyword=”ethics of autonomous vehicles” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Ethics of autonomous vehicles
- NHTSA Found Tesla’s driver assist features linked to hundreds of accidentson April 26, 2024 at 1:39 pm
In March 2023, tragedy struck when a North Carolina student was critically injured by a Tesla Model Y operating on Autopilot.
- Bills aimed at closing traffic ticket loophole for driverless cars get initial green lighton April 26, 2024 at 9:04 am
A pair of bills that aim, in part, to close a loophole prohibiting autonomous vehicles from getting traffic tickets cleared major hurdles in the California legislature this week.
- Why It’s The Year Of Proprietary Data, Not AIon April 25, 2024 at 4:45 am
The exponential growth of AI, from OpenAI to chatbots and self-driving cars, boasts of a future where machines are not just intelligent but autonomous.
- Unlocking Efficiency: The Impact of AI and Blockchain in Online Auto Auctionson April 23, 2024 at 11:57 pm
AI and blockchain technology in online auto auctions can positively impact efficiency and productivity with synergy. Through the automation of recurring tasks and process optimizations, the ...
- Driverless cars tested on Atlanta streets as Georgia Tech researches technologyon April 23, 2024 at 3:58 pm
ATLANTA - Waymo, a self-driving tech company, is testing its vehicles on the streets of Atlanta. The California-based company introduced its fleet to the city on April 16. Don't expect to look over in ...
- The Latest Insights into the Costs of Bad Codeon April 23, 2024 at 8:21 am
The cost of poor software quality in the US has grown to at least $2.41 trillion as estimated by the Consortium for Information and Software Quality.
- ASIS Foundation releases new research unveiling complexities and opportunities in autonomous vehicles for security industryon April 23, 2024 at 6:24 am
The ASIS Foundation announces its findings of a comprehensive research endeavour led by esteemed researchers Ishmael Bhila, Peter Lee, and Alison Wakefield, shedding light on the ...
- The bad and the ugly: AI is harmful, unreliable, and running out of dataon April 22, 2024 at 12:33 am
Outperforming humans is one thing, but its rapid rise has meant that AI has created some problems for itself – and we're nervous.
- The Revolutionary Impact Of Industry 4.0on April 17, 2024 at 6:01 am
AI is a machine’s ability to perform cognitive functions generally associated with the human mind. From the perspective of Industry 4.0, AI helps industrial companies take advantage of the data ...
via Bing News