Scientists at the Wellcome Sanger Institute have discovered that CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing can cause greater genetic damage in cells than was previously thought. These results create safety implications for gene therapies using CRISPR/Cas9 in the future as the unexpected damage could lead to dangerous changes in some cells.
Reported today (16 July 2018) in the journal Nature Biotechnology, the study also revealed that standard tests for detecting DNA changes miss finding this genetic damage, and that caution and specific testing will be required for any potential gene therapies.
CRISPR/Cas9 is one of the newest genome editing tools. It can alter sections of DNA in cells by cutting at specific points and introducing changes at that location. Already extensively used in scientific research, CRISPR/Cas9 has also been seen as a promising way to create potential genome editing treatments for diseases such as HIV, cancer or sickle cell disease. Such therapeutics could inactivate a disease-causing gene, or correct a genetic mutation. However, any potential treatments would have to prove that they were safe.
Previous research had not shown many unforeseen mutations from CRISPR/Cas9 in the DNA at the genome editing target site. To investigate this further the researchers carried out a full systematic study in both mouse and human cells and discovered that CRISPR/Cas9 frequently caused extensive mutations, but at a greater distance from the target site.
The researchers found many of the cells had large genetic rearrangements such as DNA deletions and insertions. These could lead to important genes being switched on or off, which could have major implications for CRISPR/Cas9 use in therapies. In addition, some of these changes were too far away from the target site to be seen with standard genotyping methods.
“This is the first systematic assessment of unexpected events resulting from CRISPR/Cas9 editing in therapeutically relevant cells, and we found that changes in the DNA have been seriously underestimated before now. It is important that anyone thinking of using this technology for gene therapy proceeds with caution, and looks very carefully to check for possible harmful effects.”
Professor Allan Bradley, corresponding author on the study from the Wellcome Sanger Institute
“My initial experiment used CRISPR/Cas9 as a tool to study gene activity, however it became clear that something unexpected was happening. Once we realised the extent of the genetic rearrangements we studied it systematically, looking at different genes and different therapeutically relevant cell lines, and showed that the CRISPR/Cas9 effects held true.”
Michael Kosicki, the first author from the Wellcome Sanger Institute
The work has implications for how CRISPR/Cas9 is used therapeutically and is likely to re-spark researchers’ interest in finding alternatives to the standard CRISPR/Cas9 method for gene editing.
“This study is the first to assess the repertoire of genomic damage arising at a CRISPR/Cas9 cleavage site. While it is not known if genomic sites in other cell lines will be affected in the same way, this study shows that further research and specific testing is needed before CRISPR/Cas9 is used clinically.”
Professor Maria Jasin, an independent researcher from Memorial Slone Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, who was not involved in the study
Learn more: Controversial study raises new doubts over unwanted genetic damage caused by CRISPR
The Latest on: CRISPR/Cas9
[google_news title=”” keyword=”CRISPR/Cas9″ num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: CRISPR/Cas9
- CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Help Combat Antimicrobial Resistanceon April 29, 2024 at 11:06 am
Despite rising global antimicrobial resistance (AMR), researchers highlight CRISPR/Cas systems' potential in antimicrobial agent development.
- Scientists' research on RNA editing illuminates possible lifesaving treatments for genetic diseaseson April 29, 2024 at 7:09 am
A team at Montana State University published research this month that shows how RNA, the close chemical cousin to DNA, can be edited using CRISPRs. The work reveals a new process in human cells that ...
- ‘ChatGPT for CRISPR’ creates new gene-editing toolson April 28, 2024 at 5:00 pm
This week, researchers published details of how they used a generative AI tool called a protein language model — a neural network trained on millions of protein sequences — to design CRISPR ...
- Buy Rating on Crispr Therapeutics AG Backed by Exa-cel’s Precision and Favorable Safety Profileon April 25, 2024 at 11:24 pm
Salim Syed, an analyst from Mizuho Securities, maintained the Buy rating on Crispr Therapeutics AG (CRSP – Research Report). The ...
- This AI Just Designed a More Precise CRISPR Gene Editor for Human Cells From Scratchon April 25, 2024 at 1:25 pm
Based on large language models—the tech behind the popular ChatGPT—Profluent's AI designed a new gene editor and put it to work in human cells.
- Peninsula biotech co-founded by Jennifer Doudna lands CRISPR gene-editing pact with Regeneronon April 25, 2024 at 6:27 am
The big deal between Regeneron and a Peninsula biotech co-founded by Jennifer Doudna is also a small deal. And that’s a huge deal.
- Regeneron and Mammoth strike $100M deal to pair tiny CRISPR editors with new delivery ideaon April 25, 2024 at 4:00 am
Regeneron is expanding its genetic medicine efforts and will work with California startup Mammoth Biosciences on gene-editing programs reaching parts of the human body beyond the liver, the companies ...
- Crispr Therapeutics: Now Is The Time To Buyon April 24, 2024 at 9:40 am
Despite recent FDA approvals for gene editing technology, CRISPR Therapeutics' stock declined. Click here to read an analysis of CRSP stock now.
- Profluent combines LLMs and CRISPR for open-source AI gene editing projecton April 23, 2024 at 11:00 am
Profluent has staked a claim at the intersection of some of the buzziest terms in biopharma. | Profluent has staked a claim at the intersection of some of the buzziest terms in biopharma. The protein ...
via Bing News