Researchers from Sweden, Germany, Brazil and the USA have developed a financial mechanism to support the protection of the world’s natural heritage.
In a recent study, they developed three different design options for an intergovernmental biodiversity financing mechanism. Asking what would happen if money was given to countries for providing protected areas, they simulated where the money would flow, what type of incentives this would create – and how these incentives would align with international conservation goals.
After long negotiations, the international community has agreed to safeguard the global ecosystems and improve on the status of biodiversity. The global conservation goals for 2020, called the Aichi targets, are an ambitious hallmark. Yet, effective implementation is largely lacking. Biodiversity is still dwindling at rates only comparable to the last planetary mass extinction. Additional effort is required to reach the Aichi targets and even more so to halt biodiversity loss.
“Human well-being depends on ecological life support. Yet, we are constantly losing biodiversity and therefore the resilience of ecosystems. At the international level, there are political goals, but the implementation of conservation policies is a national task. There is no global financial mechanism that can help nations to reach their biodiversity targets”, says lead author Nils Droste from Lund University, Sweden.
Brazil has successfully implemented Ecological Fiscal Transfer systems that compensate municipalities for hosting protected areas at a local level since the early 1990’s. According to previous findings, such mechanisms help to create additional protected areas. The international research team has therefore set out to scale this idea up to the global level where not municipalities but nations are in charge of designating protected areas. They developed and compared three different design options:
An ecocentric model: where only protected area extent per country counts – the bigger the protected area, the better;
A socio-ecological model: where protected areas and Human Development Index count, adding development justice to the previous model;
An anthropocentric model: where population density is also considered, as people benefit locally from protected areas.
The socio-ecological design was the one that proved to be the most efficient. The model provided the highest marginal incentives – that is, the most additional money for protecting an additional percent of a country’s area – for countries that are the farthest from reaching the global conservation goals. The result surprised the researchers.
“While we developed the socio-ecological design with a fairness element in mind, believing that developing countries might be more easily convinced by a design that benefits them, we were surprised how well this particular design aligns with the global policy goals”, says Nils Droste. “It would most strongly incentivize additional conservation action where the global community is lacking it the most”, he adds.
As the study was aimed at providing options, not prescriptions for policy makers, the study did not detail who should be paying or how large the fund should exactly be. Rather, it provides a yet unexplored option to develop a financial mechanism for biodiversity conservation akin to what the Green Climate Fund is for climate change.
“We know that we need to change land use in order to preserve biodiversity. Protecting land from degradation and providing healthy ecosystems, clean air or clean rivers is a function of the state. Giving a financial reward to governments for such public ecosystem services will ease the provision of corresponding conservation efforts and will help to put this on the agenda”, concludes Nils Droste.
Learn more: What if we paid countries to protect biodiversity?
The Latest on: Biodiversity
[google_news title=”” keyword=”biodiversity” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Biodiversity
- “No Mow May” Won’t Fix Our Biodiversity Problemson May 18, 2024 at 3:00 am
In 2020, the Wisconsin city of Appleton brought No Mow May to the United States. Each spring, by temporarily forgoing mowing and letting residential lawns grow with flowers, residents could support ...
- Frankel: Biodiversity: Nature by another nameon May 17, 2024 at 8:00 pm
Growing up as part of an immigrant family in Queens, New York, my childhood could be categorized as “nature deficient.” Aside from walks in the park or the special day ...
- Biodiversity Loss, Pollution, Climate Change Drive Infectious Diseaseon May 17, 2024 at 8:57 am
Scientists are trying to learn more about the exact factors that promote the spread of disease, in part because that will help us to prevent these diseases | Earth And The Environment ...
- Biodiversity celebrated at Weastecon May 17, 2024 at 3:34 am
Weastec, a prominent figure in the automotive sector, has emerged as a pioneer in promoting biodiversity, showcasing a significant shift toward sustainability. The Hillsboro site spans around 150 ...
- Denser housing can be greener too – here’s how NZ can build better for biodiversityon May 16, 2024 at 1:17 pm
The majority of 25 surveyed developments around New Zealand lacked healthy, ecologically meaningful vegetation. Applying biodiversity targets for medium-density housing could turn this around.
- How biodiversity-productivity relationships change along elevation in forestson May 16, 2024 at 10:27 am
A study published in the journal Forest Ecosystems has revealed that the relationship between biodiversity and forest productivity is not as straightforward as previously thought.
- Scientists believe AI will play a crucial role in tackling biodiversity crisison May 16, 2024 at 10:25 am
Scientists say artificial intelligence can transform the identification and monitoring of species across the world, providing a revolutionary tool in supporting action to understand and reverse ...
- A Ranch Where Quality Beef Production And Biodiversity Coexiston May 16, 2024 at 7:12 am
There is an interesting example of such a "food+biodiversity" paradigm which is underway in the Rocky Mountains southwest of Denver.
- New Study Names Biodiversity Loss As The Main Driver Of Infectious Disease Outbreakson May 15, 2024 at 9:00 am
A new study lists biodiversity loss as the single biggest driver of infectious disease outbreaks above climate change and invasive species ...
- Cities are unlikely hotspots of biodiversity. Here’s how you can track it.on May 14, 2024 at 3:30 am
Next time you pick up your phone to snap a seflie, try grabbing a photo of the life around you. Mountain lions prowl near downtown San Francisco. Leopards stalk the Mumbai suburbs. And kororā, or ...
via Bing News