A ‘Molecular Trap’ for Capturing Radioactive Iodides in Nuclear Waste
Seeking a better way to capture radioactive iodides in spent nuclear reactor fuel, Rutgers–New Brunswick scientists have developed an extremely efficient “molecular trap” that can be recycled and reused.
The trap is like a tiny, porous super-sponge. The internal surface area of just 1 gram of this material could stretch out to cover five 94-by-50-foot basketball courts, or 23,500 square feet. And, once caught inside, radioactive iodides will remain trapped for eons.
“This type of material has tremendous potential because of its high porosity,” said Jing Li, distinguished professor in the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University-New Brunswick. “It has far more space than a sponge and it can trap lots of stuff.”
Li is corresponding author of a study on molecular traps for nuclear fuel reprocessing that was published in Nature Communications. The first author is Baiyan Li, a former postdoctoral associate in Li’s group, and other Rutgers co-authors include doctoral students Hao Wang and Benjamin J. Deibert.
Reprocessing means separating spent nuclear reactor fuel into materials that may be recycled for use in new nuclear fuel or discarded as waste, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The U.S. has no commercial reprocessing facilities at the moment, but commercial facilities are operating in other countries.
When spent fuel is reprocessed, radioactive molecular iodine and organic iodide gases that pose cancer and environmental risks must be captured and sequestered. The long-lived gases are hard to capture and can leak into the environment, the Rutgers study says.
Solid adsorbents like silver-infused silica, alumina and zeolites can capture iodides, but their low uptake capacity and poor recyclability make them inefficient and costly, according to Li, who works in the School of Arts and Sciences.
It also far outperforms all current industrial materials in adsorbing, or binding to, radioactive organic iodides. For example, its ability to adsorb methyl iodide at 302 degrees Fahrenheit exceeds that of a benchmark industrial product by more than 340 percent.
Another benefit of the Rutgers molecular trap is that captured methyl iodide can be removed from metal-organic frameworks, enabling their recycling and reuse. This is not possible with current industrial products, from which adsorbent must be sequestered along with captured radioactive iodides.
The metal-organic framework is also cheaper than existing products because it doesn’t use silver or other precious metals, and is very robust, able to handle harsh reprocessing conditions such as high temperatures, high acidity and high humidity, Li said.
“We’re off to a very good start and we’d like to make improvements,” Li said. “Eventually, we hope it can be commercialized.”
Learn more: Rutgers-led Research Could Revolutionize Nuclear Waste Reprocessing and Save Money
The Latest on: Nuclear waste reprocessing
[google_news title=”” keyword=”nuclear waste reprocessing” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]- Yucca Mountain: Where GOP Senate candidates standon May 12, 2024 at 7:12 am
Plans to turn Yucca Mountain into the country’s nuclear waste bin are at a standstill, but discussions of restarting the proposal have drawn concerns — and different opinions — from Nevada’s elected ...
- US Congress Holds Hearing on Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposalon May 9, 2024 at 4:59 pm
Subcommittee witnesses consisted of the following: The Director of the Idaho National Laboratory, which conducts nuclear research and limited SNF reprocessing The former Deputy Director of the Office ...
- New Centre to Develop Nuclear Decontamination Technologieson May 9, 2024 at 3:11 pm
Sellafield Ltd is the company responsible for safely delivering decommissioning, reprocessing and nuclear waste management activities on behalf of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority at Sellafield.
- Transforming nuclear waste to glass: Hanford cleanup plans take a step forwardon May 9, 2024 at 2:35 pm
After four years of closed door negotiations, the Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, and Washington State Department of Ecology put forward a new plan to handle that waste, which ...
- When nuclear waste is an asset, not a burdenon May 8, 2024 at 2:25 pm
To keep costs down, reprocessing facilities provide services to other countries ... although the country is renewing efforts to work on closed nuclear fuel cycles and use its existing nuclear waste to ...
- The undersea nuclear graveyard now more costly than HS2on May 5, 2024 at 7:04 am
A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever ...
- Nuclear waste at center of testy Nevada Senate raceon May 5, 2024 at 7:00 am
Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sam Brown is under fire from Democrats for 2022 remarks in which he expressed support for plans to store federal nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain. Nevada ...
- Nuclear Power as a Clean Energy Tool?on May 3, 2024 at 9:22 am
Readers discuss an Opinion guest essay calling that a fantasy. Also: Quality at Boeing; a toilet sign; running, fast and slow.
- An Ontario farm town will vote in October on whether it wants to house Canada's largest nuclear waste dumpon May 2, 2024 at 11:43 pm
The Nuclear Waste Management Organization's search for a deep geological repository stretches back decades, and has been narrowed down to: Teeswater, a town with a population of about 5,880 ...
- After Vogtle, what’s next for nuclear?on April 30, 2024 at 3:53 am
The Georgia reactors came online Monday — seven years late at a cost of $35 billion, more than double the initial $14 billion estimate.
via Google News and Bing News