Mercury is very toxic and can cause long-term health damage, but removing it from water is challenging. To address this growing problem, University of Minnesota College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Sciences (CFANS) Professor Abdennour Abbas and his lab team created a sponge that can absorb mercury from a polluted water source within seconds.
Thanks to the application of nanotechnology, the team developed a sponge with outstanding mercury adsorption properties where mercury contaminations can be removed from tap, lake and industrial wastewater to below detectable limits in less than 5 seconds (or around 5 minutes for industrial wastewater). The sponge converts the contamination into a non-toxic complex so it can be disposed of in a landfill after use. The sponge also kills bacterial and fungal microbes.
Think of it this way: If Como Lake was contaminated with mercury at the EPA limit, the sponge needed to remove all of the mercury would be the size of a basketball.
This is an important advancement for the state of Minnesota, as more than two thirds of the waters on Minnesota’s 2004 Impaired Waters List are impaired because of mercury contamination that ranges from 0.27 to 12.43 ng/L (the EPA limit is 2 ng/L). Mercury contamination of lake waters results in mercury accumulation in fish, leading the Minnesota Department of Health to establish fish consumption guidelines. A number of fish species store-bought or caught in Minnesota lakes are not advised for consumption more than once a week or even once a month. In Minnesota’s North Shore, 10 percent of tested newborns had mercury concentrations above the EPA reference dose for methylmercury (the form of mercury found in fish). This means that some pregnant women in the Lake Superior region, and in Minnesota, have mercury exposures that need to be reduced.  In addition, a reduced deposition of mercury is projected to have economic benefits reflected by an annual state willingness-to-pay of $212 million in Minnesota alone.
According to the US-EPA, cutting mercury emissions to the latest established effluent limit standards would result in 130,000 fewer asthma attacks, 4,700 fewer heart attacks, and 11,000 fewer premature deaths each year. That adds up to at least $37 billion to $90 billion in annual monetized benefits annually.
In addition to improving air and water quality, aquatic life and public health, the new technology would have an impact on inspiring new regulations. Technology shapes regulations, which in turn determine the value of the market. The 2015 EPA Mercury and Air Toxics Standards regulation was estimated to cost the industry around of $9.6 billion annually in 2020. The new U of M technology has a potential of bringing this cost down and make it easy for the industry to meet regulatory requirements.
Learn more: “Super sponge” promises effective toxic clean-up of lakes and more
[osd_subscribe categories=’mercury-pollution’ placeholder=’Email Address’ button_text=’Subscribe Now for any new posts on the topic “MERCURY POLLUTION”‘]
Receive an email update when we add a new MERCURY POLLUTIONÂ article.
The Latest on: Mercury pollution
[google_news title=”” keyword=”mercury pollution” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Mercury pollution
- Michelle Uberuaga: Updated air pollution regulations are a win for Montana familieson May 8, 2024 at 5:00 am
The recently updated Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) reduces pollution from power plants and builds upon a foundation laid more than a decade ago to ensure our outdoor heritage ...
- One way or another, new EPA rules will stop pollution from coal-fired emissionson May 8, 2024 at 3:18 am
A new EPA rule will require coal fired power plants to capture carbon emissions. Some advocates view it as a way to put big polluters out of business.
- EPA Finalizes Rules to Regulate Pollution from Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plantson May 7, 2024 at 5:00 pm
The Result: The regulations target pollution from: (i) emissions of greenhouse gases, mercury, and other air toxics; (ii) wastewater at coal-fired steam energy generating units; and (iii) coal ...
- EPA finalizes standards to reduce pollution from fossil fuel-fired power plantson May 5, 2024 at 7:38 pm
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a suite of rules that are designed to reduce pollution from fossil fuel-fired power plants. The department hopes these rules will reduce ...
- New EPA rules will force fossil fuel power plants to cut pollutionon May 3, 2024 at 1:08 am
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday released a sweeping set of rules aimed at cutting air, water and land pollution from fossil fuel-fired power plants. Environmental and clean energy ...
- New US climate rules for pollution cuts ‘probably terminal’ for coal-fired plantson May 2, 2024 at 3:52 am
which also contain requirements to crack down on mercury pollution, wastewater discharge and coal ash disposal, means “we will see some coal retirements” beyond this, acknowledged Michael ...
- New EPA regulations target air, water, land and climate pollution from power plants, especially those that burn coalon May 1, 2024 at 5:32 am
Electric power generation in the U.S. is shifting rapidly away from fossil fuels toward cleaner and lower-carbon sources. State clean energy targets and dramatic declines in the cost of renewable ...
- Study shows climate change and mercury pollution stressed plants for millions of yearson April 30, 2024 at 9:34 am
The link between massive flood basalt volcanism and the end-Triassic (201 million years ago) mass extinction is commonly accepted. However, exactly how volcanism led to the collapse of ecosystems and ...
- Climate change and mercury pollution stressed plants for millions of yearson April 30, 2024 at 8:40 am
A new study in Nature Communications adds new compelling evidence for the combined effects of global warming and widespread mercury pollution that continued to stress plants long after volcanic ...
via Bing News