A new study conducted by Drexel University environmental sociologist Robert J. Brulle, PhD, exposes the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the powerful climate change countermovement.
This study marks the first peer-reviewed, comprehensive analysis ever conducted of the sources of funding that maintain the denial effort.
Through an analysis of the financial structure of the organizations that constitute the core of the countermovement and their sources of monetary support, Brulle found that, while the largest and most consistent funders behind the countermovement are a number of well-known conservative foundations, the majority of donations are “dark money,” or concealed funding.
The data also indicates that Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, two of the largest supporters of climate science denial, have recently pulled back from publicly funding countermovement organizations. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to countermovement organizations through third party pass-through foundations like Donors Trust and Donors Capital, whose funders cannot be traced, has risen dramatically.
Brulle, a professor of sociology and environmental science in Drexel’s College of Arts and Sciences, conducted the study during a year-long fellowship at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. The study was published today in Climatic Change, one of the top 10 climate science journals in the world.
The climate change countermovement is a well-funded and organized effort to undermine public faith in climate science and block action by the U.S. government to regulate emissions. This countermovement involves a large number of organizations, including conservative think tanks, advocacy groups, trade associations and conservative foundations, with strong links to sympathetic media outlets and conservative politicians.
“The climate change countermovement has had a real political and ecological impact on the failure of the world to act on the issue of global warming,” said Brulle. “Like a play on Broadway, the countermovement has stars in the spotlight – often prominent contrarian scientists or conservative politicians – but behind the stars is an organizational structure of directors, script writers and producers, in the form of conservative foundations. If you want to understand what’s driving this movement, you have to look at what’s going on behind the scenes.”
To uncover how the countermovement was built and maintained, Brulle developed a listing of 118 important climate denial organizations in the U.S. He then coded data on philanthropic funding for each organization, combining information from the Foundation Center with financial data submitted by organizations to the Internal Revenue Service.
The final sample for analysis consisted of 140 foundations making 5,299 grants totaling $558 million to 91 organizations from 2003 to 2010. The data shows that these 91 organizations have an annual income of just over $900 million, with an annual average of $64 million in identifiable foundation support. Since the majority of the organizations are multiple focus organizations, not all of this income was devoted to climate change activities, Brulle notes.
Key findings include:
- Conservative foundations have bank-rolled denial. The largest and most consistent funders of organizations orchestrating climate change denial are a number of well-known conservative foundations, such as the Searle Freedom Trust, the John William Pope Foundation, the Howard Charitable Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation. These foundations promote ultra-free-market ideas in many realms.
- Koch and ExxonMobil have recently pulled back from publicly visible funding. From 2003 to 2007, the Koch Affiliated Foundations and the ExxonMobil Foundation were heavily involved in funding climate-change denial organizations. But since 2008, they are no longer making publicly traceable contributions.
- Funding has shifted to pass through untraceable sources. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to denial organizations by the Donors Trust has risen dramatically. Donors Trust is a donor-directed foundation whose funders cannot be traced. This one foundation now provides about 25% of all traceable foundation funding used by organizations engaged in promoting systematic denial of climate change.
- Most funding for denial efforts is untraceable. Despite extensive data compilation and analyses, only a fraction of the hundreds of millions in contributions to climate change denying organizations can be specifically accounted for from public records. Approximately 75% of the income of these organizations comes from unidentifiable sources.
The Latest on: Climate Change Denial
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Climate Change Denial ” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate Change Denial
- White House snubs DeSantis climate move as ‘shameful’on May 16, 2024 at 1:02 pm
It’s unfortunate that there are climate deniers still out there,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Thursday.
- 'They're dangerous!' Expert calls for man-made climate deniers to be treated as criminalson May 14, 2024 at 7:21 am
EXCLUSIVE: Man-made climate denial should be made a criminal offence to help protect the planet and stop people being misled, an expert says.
- The power of ambiguity: Using computer models to understand the debate about climate changeon May 13, 2024 at 12:53 pm
Cognitive biases are among the most important factors that prevent people from changing their minds. Climate change deniers and climate activists often tend to accept only information that confirms ...
- CT lawmakers take no action on climate change – againon May 11, 2024 at 2:10 am
In the CT session that just ended, aside from some slight expansions for solar power and funding for some climate focused projects in the bonding package, other major climate bills failed.
- Tackling climate change denialon May 10, 2024 at 8:10 pm
‘Dhye Dreams’, winner of the Best Short Documentary at NEUFF (Nepal European Union Film Festival) 2024, brings attention to the climate crisis which is often neglected. Directed by Shanta Nepali, this ...
- Denial permeates climate, nuclear criseson May 9, 2024 at 12:50 pm
The conservative columnist George Will wrote a very welcome column calling attention to a book, “Nuclear War: A Scenario,” by historian Annie Jacobsen, a ...
- The big climate change lifestyle denialon May 8, 2024 at 9:06 pm
The big climate change lifestyle denial: half won’t change what they eat and one-third won’t change their modes of transport. Warning of widespread misunderstandings on what it takes to make ...
- Andrew Coyne Helped Run Charity That Gave $6.4M to Climate Crisis Denial Groupson May 7, 2024 at 11:42 am
Federal tax data reveals the Canadian journalist spent 10 years at the Aurea Foundation, a top funder of think tanks that argue the climate crisis isn’t real.
- Amid growing misinformation, climate education advocates push for more school instructionon May 7, 2024 at 8:28 am
A bill that requires Minnesota schools to teach about climate justice won’t advance this year, but advocates say they’ll keep trying.
- Nuclear power makes no sense for Australia – but it’s a useful diversion from real climate actionon May 5, 2024 at 1:06 pm
Insisting nuclear power is the only way for Australia to achieve net zero by 2050 is a classic move from the playbook of those who oppose urgent action on climate change.
via Bing News