When science gets it wrong: Let the light shine in

Combination of 20px and rotated version of 20px to form icon for Peer Review process (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Combination of 20px and rotated version of 20px to form icon for Peer Review process (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Two big recent scientific results are looking shaky—and it is open peer review on the internet that has been doing the shaking

SCIENTISTS make much of the fact that their work is scrutinised anonymously by some of their peers before it is published. This “peer review” is supposed to spot mistakes and thus keep the whole process honest.

The peers in question, though, are necessarily few in number, are busy with their own work, are expected to act unpaid—and are often the rivals of those whose work they are scrutinising. And so, by a mixture of deliberation and technological pressure, the system is starting to change. The internet means anyone can appoint himself a peer and criticise work that has entered the public domain. And two recent incidents have shown how valuable this can be.

Read more . . .

 

The Latest on: Open peer review

[google_news title=”” keyword=”Open peer review” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]

via Google News

 

See Also
Open_Access_PLoS.svg (Photo credit: PGRsOnline)
The Latest on: Open peer review
  • Meta AI Review: A Convenient but Unimpressive Virtual Assistant
    on May 8, 2024 at 5:05 am

    Meta AI is accessible, and its image generator is undeniably cool. But hallucinations and fewer refinements put Meta in the middle of the pack.

  • Open Science: Why you should preprint your next paper
    on May 7, 2024 at 12:39 pm

    What are preprints and how do they benefit you and your research community? Plus find tools that help you keep up with the preprint literature.

  • Mobile council questions Mayor's probes, initiates independent review
    on May 2, 2024 at 1:29 pm

    Later Tuesday the Mobile City Council voted to open their own investigation and hire a special ... or other misconduct” related to the 321z Insights third-party peer review of Operation Echo Stop. The ...

  • The Situation In Afghanistan Under Review By The United Nations
    on April 30, 2024 at 8:00 am

    Afghanistan was reviewed by the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) working group.

  • Pros and cons of open peer review
    on April 28, 2024 at 9:40 pm

    Advocates of open review argue that openness will force ... The BMJ claims that, since it opened up its peer-review process, only a small percentage (about 2%) of referees have refused to review ...

  • Open Source Software : Is it Secure and Safe to Use?
    on April 26, 2024 at 3:38 am

    Learn more about Open Source software security and how you can keep yourself safe when using open source applications by using a few guiding ...

  • Instructions for peer reviewers
    on March 27, 2023 at 1:05 am

    Peer review is the foundation of quality in research for both books and journals, ensuring that published research is rigorous and ethical. Peer reviewers can access a number of resources to assist ...

  • Can I publish open access in any RSC journal?
    on October 21, 2022 at 7:38 pm

    And the same applies to peer review – our quality standards are identical. However, if your manuscript is accepted for publication, you will need to choose an open access licence and, in some cases, ...

  • Open Research
    on July 13, 2022 at 3:12 pm

    Much of the discussion around Open Research focuses on Open Access and Open Data but it also includes peer review, protocols, notebooks, citizen science, software and much more. It is widely ...

  • Peer Review
    on August 3, 2021 at 8:07 am

    anonymized peer-review and open peer review. The system has been exhaustively studied, reported on, and assessed -- both positively and negatively. Nature Portfolio journals' position on the value ...

via  Bing News

 

 

What's Your Reaction?
Don't Like it!
0
I Like it!
0
Scroll To Top