A new study examining the impact of geoengineering uses climate models to identify which temperatures are most conducive for malaria transmission by the Anopheles mosquito and identify how many people live in areas where transmission is possible.
Geoengineering the climate would have massive repercussions for the health of billions of people at risk of malaria who live in tropical countries, according to a new finding by scientists at Georgetown University Medical Center and colleagues.
The study appeared April 20, 2022, in Nature Communications.
This is the first assessment of how geoengineering the climate could impact the burden of infectious diseases. The study focuses on solar radiation management (SRM), an intervention that hypothesizes emergency actions aimed at reducing dangerous impacts of climate change. One action that has been proposed is injecting aerosols into the stratosphere that reflect incoming sunlight, thereby temporarily “pausing” global warming. Though SRM is often discussed as a way to reduce climate injustice, its potential impacts on health have seldom been studied.
“The implications of the study for decision-making are significant,” says Colin Carlson, PhD, an assistant research professor at the Center for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University Medical Center and lead author of the study. “Geoengineering might save lives, but the assumption that it will do so equally for everyone might leave some countries at a disadvantage when it comes time to make decisions. If geoengineering is about protecting populations on the frontlines of climate change, we should be able to add up the risks and benefits — especially in terms of neglected health burdens, such as mosquito-borne disease.”
A team of eight researchers from the United States, Bangladesh, South Africa, and Germany used climate models to simulate what malaria transmission could look like in two future scenarios, with medium or high levels of global warming, with and without geoengineering. The models identify which temperatures are most conducive for transmission by the Anopheles mosquito and identify how many people live in areas where transmission is possible.
In both medium- and high-warming scenarios, malaria risk was predicted to shift significantly between regions; but in the high warming scenario, simulations found that a billion extra people were at risk of malaria in the geoengineered world.
“On a planet that’s too hot for humans, it also gets too hot for the malaria parasite,” says Carlson. “Cooling the planet might be an emergency option to save lives, but it would also reverse course on those declines.”
The study follows a 2018 commentary in Nature Climate Change by Carlson and the study’s senior author, Christopher Trisos, PhD, a senior researcher at the University of Cape Town in South Africa. In the commentary, the researchers proposed a hypothesis now confirmed in the new study: because malaria transmission peaks at 25°C, cooling the tropics using geoengineering might ultimately increase malaria risk in some places relative to an alternative future, but might also increase risk in the present day.
“The potential for geoengineering to reduce risks from climate change remains poorly understood, and it could introduce a range of new risks to people and ecosystems,” says Trisos.
Carlson says that one of the most surprising findings was the scale of potential trade-offs between regions. For example, in both scenarios, the authors found that geoengineering might substantially reduce malaria risk in the Indian subcontinent even compared to the present day. However, that protective effect would be offset with an increase in risk in southeast Asia. For decision-makers, this might complicate the geopolitical reality of climate intervention.
“We’re so early in this process that the conversation is still about increasing Global South leadership in geoengineering research. Our study highlights that the frontlines of climate injustice aren’t one monolithic bloc, especially when it comes to health,” says Carlson.
Original Article: Geoengineering Could Return Risk of Malaria for One Billion People
More from: Georgetown University Medical Center | University of Cape Town | University of Maryland College Park | International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh | University of Florida | Cologne University of Applied Sciences | Rutgers University
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Geoengineering and infectious diseases
- Environmental Changes Are Fueling Human, Animal and Plant Diseases, Study Finds
Biodiversity loss, global warming, pollution and the spread of invasive species are making infectious diseases more dangerous to organisms around the world.
- Startups want to cool Earth by reflecting sunlight. There are few rules and big risks
Changing temperatures and rainfall patterns could mean new risks for infectious diseases, says Christopher Trisos, chief research officer in the Climate Risk Lab at the University of Cape Town. "Solar ...
- Startups want to cool Earth by reflecting sunlight. There are few rules and big risks
In the novel, a billionaire undertakes a type of "solar geoengineering": shooting vast ... and rainfall patterns could mean new risks for infectious diseases, says Christopher Trisos, chief ...
- Infectious Diseases
An innovative partnership between infectious disease researchers and the Fulton County Jail has produced insight that could help detect and track future disease outbreaks. An immune-compromised ...
- Infectious Diseases
Pneumonia in the Shadow of COVID-19: Along Came COVID Infectious disease experts describe ways in which COVID pneumonia differs from community-acquired pneumonia and how COVID vaccines may offer ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Geoengineering and infectious diseases
[google_news title=”” keyword=”geoengineering and infectious diseases” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Geoengineering and health
- Her job: Ensuring AI and radical climate fixes don’t backfire
Over the last two years, OSTP has helped craft new guidelines for artificial intelligence, including a presidential executive order and a long-awaited — but nonbinding — AI Bill of Rights, which ...
- Doomsday Unveiled: 15 Terrifying Predictions from Scientific Theories
Geoengineering is related to deliberate and large-scale interventions ... Genetic instability or off-target effects could be unintended consequences that could affect the health and well-being of ...
- Scientist Slams Politicians For Banning Geoengineering Experiments
A scientist is warning against regulatory attempts to ban geoengineering, which seeks to alter the climate as global warming threatens to make the planet less habitable for us humans. In an ...
- Solar geoengineering to cool the planet: Is it worth the risks?
When I first wrote about geoengineering in 2012 , it was considered far-fetched at best, and crazy by most. But 12 years later, while there is still controversy and considerable resistance to ...
- Geoengineering could save the ice sheets – but only if we start soon
Shading Earth’s surface from sunlight could postpone or even avoid the collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet – but only if we start soon and only in conjunction with substantial emissions ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Geoengineering and health
[google_news title=”” keyword=”geoengineering and health” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]