Bars show sustained reduction in annual CO2 emissions necessary to equal cumulative reduction in radiative forcing, a measure of the instantaneous warming potential of the atmosphere, of the given scenario in 2050 (blue) and 2100 (orange).
CREDIT: Eisen and Brown, 2022, CC-BY 4.0
Combined effects of biomass recovery and reduced emissions from livestock could significantly impede climate change
A new model suggests a global switch from an animal-based to a plant-based diet would have a substantial impact in stabilizing greenhouse gas levels, equivalent to a significant reduction in CO2 emissions. Michael Eisen of the University of California, Berkeley and Patrick Brown of Stanford University and Impossible Foods present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS Climate on February 1, 2022.
Animal agriculture contributes significantly to global warming because of the methane, nitrous oxide and carbon emissions of livestock and their supply chains, and because carbon-sequestering biomass is often displaced on land used for grazing and for growing animal feed. But unlike emissions from fossil fuel combustion, the emissions from animal agriculture would be largely reversible as that industry diminishes, through biomass recovery on land previously cleared for livestock and spontaneous decay of methane and nitrous oxide. This means that replacement of animals in the global food system could help to put the brakes on climate change.
The authors of the present study use a simple climate model to incorporate the combined effects of reduced emissions and biomass recovery resulting from a global switch to a plant-based diet. Using publicly available data, they examine how this change might affect emissions between 2020 and 2100, relative to current baseline emissions, under scenarios including an immediate switch from animal- to plant-based agriculture, a 15-year phased transition, and a partial change where only certain animal products were phased out.
In this analysis, switching to plant-based agriculture could reduce emissions by the equivalent of 25 gigatons of carbon dioxide per year. A 15-year phased transition could reduce emissions sufficiently to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years. Impacts of phasing out animal-based agriculture differed greatly by species, with cattle accounting for 71 percent of the benefits to emissions (47 percent through beef and 24 percent through milk). While fully phasing out animal-based agriculture was projected to have the largest impact, replacing ruminants alone could achieve over 90 percent of the reduction in emissions.
The researchers’ model is based on a number of simplifying assumptions. Current greenhouse gas emissions levels form the baseline for both present-day and future projections, whereas baseline emissions may in fact change as technology advances, nations develop and populations evolve. In addition, the researchers made assumptions about the fate of land currently used for animal-based agriculture which would be surplus relative to demand for meat. The validity of such assumptions would affect the extent to which these conclusions would hold if applied in the real world.
The model does not consider the viability – in terms of geographic, cultural and nutritional constraints – of switching to plant-based agriculture worldwide, and some regions, such as the drylands of sub-Saharan Africa, may be unsuitable for culturing crops. Also, the analysis focuses on terrestrial agriculture, excluding aquaculture and fishing.
The authors hope that their work in clarifying the “climate opportunity cost” of animal agriculture “will help policymakers and the public properly prioritize dietary change as a climate defense strategy”.
Mike Eisen notes: “This study shows that a global transition away from the use of animals, especially cattle, to produce food has the potential to rapidly remove large amounts of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide from the atmosphere, representing a unique opportunity to achieve the negative emissions required to keep temperatures from exceeding 2C.”
Original Article: Phasing out animal agriculture could potentially stabilize greenhouse gas levels for decades, according to new model
More from: University of California Berkeley | Stanford University
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Reduced emissions from livestock
- Net zero plans show limited climate ambition on 'residual' emissions
New research by the University of East Anglia (UEA) reveals what countries think will be their most difficult to decarbonize sectors when they reach net zero, with agriculture expected to be ...
- Meiji and DSM-Firmenich partner to reduce methane emissions
DSM-Firmenich and Meiji Holdings have signed an MoU to enhance the sustainability of Japanese dairy farming through the implementation of Bovaer.
- Changes in farm and food production can cut Greenhouse emissions by a third — World Bank
The global agrifood system presents a huge opportunity to cut almost a third of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions through affordable and available actions, while continuing to feed a growing ...
- Vietnam farmers reduce methane emissions
Instead, it’s collected by the Loc Troi Group for sale to other companies that use it as livestock feed and for growing ... to sign a 2021 pledge to reduce methane emissions at the annual United ...
- Cut Aid for Livestock Farms to Help Climate Fight, World Bank Says
Wealthy nations should reduce financial support for livestock farming to help tackle pollution caused by consuming red meat and dairy, according to the World Bank.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Reduced emissions from livestock
[google_news title=”” keyword=”reduced emissions from livestock” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Phaseout of animal agriculture
- B.C. mink farms' challenge to government ban dismissed in court
Five different lawsuits from B.C. mink farms seeking to reverse the provincial government's ban on their industry have been tossed out of the province's Supreme Court.
- Use of electric collars on cats and dogs to be banned under new regulations
Minister for Agriculture Charlie McConalogue is to introduce regulations in the coming months to ban the use of electric collars on dogs and cats. The move follows months of “significant consultation” ...
- Electronic shock collar for dogs, cats to be banned
Electronic shock collar for dogs and cats that are controlled using hand-held remote controls are to be banned in Ireland following a public consultation ordered by the Minister for Agriculture.
- Silence from Minister Watt on live sheep export questions
AUSTRALIA’S Minister for Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry Murray Watt seems unwilling to offer Western Australia’s struggling sheep industry or live export opponents any certainty in the lead up to ...
- As Passover and Earth Day coincide, movement calls on Jews to go vegan
“A global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels [in] 30 years,” he said, citing a study pointing out that “This is the exact timespan until the ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Phaseout of animal agriculture
[google_news title=”” keyword=”phaseout of animal agriculture” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]