It is wartime. You and your fellow refugees are hiding from enemy soldiers, when a baby begins to cry. You cover her mouth to block the sound. If you remove your hand, her crying will draw the attention of the soldiers, who will kill everyone. If you smother the child, you’ll save yourself and the others.
If you were in that situation, which was dramatized in the final episode of the ’70s and ’80s TV series “M.A.S.H.,” what would you do?
The results of a new UCLA study suggest that scientists could make a good guess based on how the brain responds when people watch someone else experience pain. The study found that those responses predict whether people will be inclined to avoid causing harm to others when facing moral dilemmas.
“The findings give us a glimpse into what is the nature of morality,” said Dr. Marco Iacoboni, director of the Neuromodulation Lab at UCLA’s Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center and the study’s senior author. “This is a foundational question to understand ourselves, and to understand how the brain shapes our own nature.”
In the study, which was published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Iacoboni and colleagues analyzed mirror neurons, brain cells that respond equally when someone performs an action or simply watches someone else perform the same action. Mirror neurons play a vital role in how people learn through mimicry and feel empathy for others.
When you wince while seeing someone experience pain — a phenomenon called “neural resonance” — mirror neurons are responsible.
Iacoboni wondered if neural resonance might play a role in how people navigate complicated problems that require both conscious deliberation and consideration of another’s feelings.
To find out, researchers showed 19 volunteers two videos: one of a hypodermic needle piercing a hand, and another of a hand being gently touched by a cotton swab. During both, the scientists used a functional MRI machine to measure activity in the volunteers’ brains.
Researchers later asked the participants how they would behave in a variety of moral dilemmas, including the scenario involving the crying baby during wartime, the prospect of torturing another person to prevent a bomb from killing several other people and whether to harm research animals in order to cure AIDS.
Participants also responded to scenarios in which causing harm would make the world worse — inflicting harm on another person in order to avoid two weeks of hard labor, for example — to gauge their willingness to cause harm for moral reasons and for less-noble motives.
Iacoboni and his colleagues hypothesized that people who had greater neural resonance than the other participants while watching the hand-piercing video would also be less likely to choose to silence the baby in the hypothetical dilemma, and that proved to be true. Indeed, people with stronger activity in the inferior frontal cortex, a part of the brain essential for empathy and imitation, were less willing to cause direct harm, such as silencing the baby.
But the researchers found no correlation between people’s brain activity and their willingness to hypothetically harm one person in the interest of the greater good — such as silencing the baby to save more lives. Those decisions are thought to stem from more cognitive, deliberative processes.
The study confirms that genuine concern for others’ pain plays a causal role in moral dilemma judgments, Iacoboni said. In other words, a person’s refusal to silence the baby is due to concern for the baby, not just the person’s own discomfort in taking that action.
Iacoboni’s next project will explore whether a person’s decision-making in moral dilemmas can be influenced by decreasing or enhancing activity in the areas of the brain that were targeted in the current study.
“It would be fascinating to see if we can use brain stimulation to change complex moral decisions through impacting the amount of concern people experience for others’ pain,” Iacoboni said. “It could provide a new method for increasing concern for others’ well-being.”
The research could point to a way to help people with mental disorders such as schizophrenia that make interpersonal communication difficult, Iacoboni said.
Learn more: Mirror neuron activity predicts people’s decision-making in moral dilemmas, UCLA study finds
The Latest on: Nature of morality
[google_news title=”” keyword=”nature of morality” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]- Dolly Parton Was Moral to the Point of ‘Obsession,’ Said Her Guitariston May 1, 2024 at 10:35 am
Dolly Parton's guitarist knew all about the affair rumors surrounding her. Here's why he thought they were all false.
- ChatGPT shows better moral judgement than a college undergradon May 1, 2024 at 9:50 am
For the study, the researchers used a modified version of a Moral Turing Test first proposed in 2000 to judge "human-like performance" on theoretical moral challenges. The researchers started with a ...
- The Bible is called the “worst book ever” by HBO’s Brian Cox because it is full of “lies and propaganda.”on May 1, 2024 at 3:01 am
HBO’s Brian Cox has sparked controversy with his recent comments regarding the Bible, referring to it as the “worst book ever” due to its alleged content of “lies and propaganda.” The veteran actor’s ...
- Autonomous weapons reduce moral agency and devalue human lifeon April 30, 2024 at 8:40 pm
Military technology experts gathered in Vienna have warned about the detrimental psychological effects of AI-powered weapons, arguing that implementing systems of algorithmic-enabled killing dehumanis ...
- The Reason of Mary Wollstonecraft: Championing Women and Their Moral Formationon April 29, 2024 at 8:41 pm
Ultimately, she placed her hope not in human reason, which she well knew was fallible, but in God’s eternal reason and his promises.
- An Alignment Chart Ranking of Every Fallout Character So Faron April 29, 2024 at 6:19 pm
The Fallout game series was one of the pioneers of GenX and Millennial storytelling. As a post-apocalyptic vision of human civilization gone ...
- The soul of the US is up for grabs - can it be restored?on April 29, 2024 at 9:43 am
Finally, to renew our public culture by restoring a proper view of freedom, we must return to a more classical view of human beings. A human being is more than the sum total of his desires. He is ...
- Planning ahead eases Alzheimer's moral and ethical challengeson April 29, 2024 at 3:31 am
The very nature of this debilitating brain disorder presents a host of moral and/or ethical challenges both for the affected individual and the caregiver. The point of diagnosis in one dilemma. Some ...
- The ethics of eating monsterson April 28, 2024 at 9:10 am
Unfortunately, Star Wars never really interrogates the ethics of eating. Then again, it isn’t often that the ethics of eating are ever considered in fiction, which is why "Delicious in Dungeon" is ...
- TikTok ban is Congress’ latest moral panicon April 27, 2024 at 5:00 pm
Blame a moral panic of the past ... because the “book of nature” was available to all. Then came the Cold War. After the Soviet Union successfully tested an atomic bomb in 1949, the U.S ...
via Google News and Bing News