Intellectual property: After being blamed for stymying innovation in America, vague and overly broad patents on software and business processes could get the chop
AT LAST, it seems, something is to be done about the dysfunctional way America’s patent system operates. Two recent developments suggest calls for patent reform are finally being heard at the highest levels. First, in 2013, defying expectations, the House of Representatives passed (by an overwhelming majority) the Innovation Act, a bill aimed squarely at neutralising so-called patent trolls. These are individuals or companies who buy up lots of patents and then use them to extract payments from unsuspecting victims. Second, the US Supreme Court agreed to rule on what is the most contentious issue of all: which inventions are actually eligible for patent protection.
Frivolous lawsuits filed by trolls cost American companies $29 billion in 2011 alone. Trolls (known in the legal world as “patent assertion entities” or “non-practising entities”) do not make anything, but send out thousands of “demand letters” to companies that allegedly infringe what are often vague and overly broad business-process and software patents. In recent years their targets have spread from high-tech firms to universities, retailers, hospitals, charities and even consumers. The trolls demand a settlement fee, which many of the victims pay rather than face the punitive cost of litigation—$2m or more these days.
Concern that the flood of frivolous patent suits in America is hobbling innovation and competition has caught Congress’s attention. Startups threatened by such actions frequently have to withdraw from the business or go bust. Bigger companies that choose to fight spend tens of millions of dollars on litigation that could otherwise go on research and development.
In a sense, the legal bullying by trolls is a symptom of a wider complaint: the poor quality of many patents granted by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in the past decade—especially those covering computer software and business transactions (themselves often based on software algorithms). One such patent covers simply upgrading computer software over the internet. That is admittedly useful, but hardly novel or non-obvious—the three fundamental requirements for eligibility adopted by patent jurisdictions everywhere.
Numerous corporations have started using their portfolios of poorly defined software patents to prevent rivals from entering the market. Witness the series of lengthy legal disputes between Apple and Samsung. Too often, it seems, software patents operate not as an incentive for innovation, but as a barrier to entry and a tax on new-product development. This is not what patent law was intended to do. Although the USPTO has been mainly at fault, America’s courts have not helped.
One of the worst offenders has been the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the appellate court that rules on patent disputes, among countless other things. Unlike its specialised counterparts in Europe and Japan, the Federal Circuit, with its grab-bag remit, has never acquired expertise in patent jurisprudence. As a consequence, it has issued some bizarre software rulings.
The Latest on: Patent trolls
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Patent trolls” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Patent trolls
- The best NJ town to celebrate Cinco de Mayo is…on April 26, 2024 at 10:29 am
Atlantic City is a great place to celebrate anything! The town is like a celebration every day! So it makes sense that it would be the perfect place to celebrate Cinco de Mayo. Here are a handful of ...
- All Galaxy smartphones affected: Samsung loses patent lawsuiton April 25, 2024 at 5:00 pm
Datang actively develops radio technology and products, so it is not just a so-called patent troll that lives off patent lawsuits. heise online has a redacted version of the judgment from April 12, ...
- Celebrating World IP Day: Is the Innovative Future Sustainable?on April 25, 2024 at 10:15 am
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) established World IP Day 19 years ago to celebrate the day on which the WIPO Convention entered into force: April 26, 1970. And this year, WIPO has ...
- Nicola Coughlan Claps Back at Hater Who Criticized Her for Wearing a Bra Top: ‘It Looked Good’on April 24, 2024 at 11:10 am
Nicola Coughlan defended a recent outfit she wore while doing a photoshoot with ‘Bridgerton’ costar Luke Newton ...
- Moderna Investors Should Beware Patent-Dispute Fallouton April 23, 2024 at 11:40 am
Moderna's stock soared on positive cancer vaccine trial results, but legal troubles loom as a patent dispute threatens massive damages. Read my analysis here.
- Five practical ways to turbocharge competitionon April 18, 2024 at 4:42 pm
Former productivity commission chairman Peter Harris suggests that supermarkets, banks and qualifications are some of the areas to focus on.
- How two small Texas towns became the patent-law centre of Americaon April 16, 2024 at 12:06 pm
Patent litigation could reasonably warrant a specialised court, similar to the system America uses to handle bankruptcy cases, stacked with experienced judges. “There are compelling reasons why ...
- KnowBe4 sued for patent infringement by 'patent troll'on April 16, 2024 at 4:12 am
The lawsuit alleges KnowBe4's offerings infringe on another patented technology. A South Florida-based IP attorney said it is not an easy case for the plaintiff.
- We need to pass U.S. Farm Bill, but we can't undermine it with harmful patent legislationon April 12, 2024 at 1:41 am
PERA, a paradigm-shifting piece of patent legislation, is quietly being considered in the halls of Congress, former U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts warns.
- Leahy: At last, a fed crackdown on judge shoppingon April 12, 2024 at 1:24 am
For too long, some plaintiffs have been able to “judge shop,” effectively choosing the judge who will oversee their case.
via Bing News