EVEN HIGH-INCOME COUNTRIES ARE FOUND LACKING AND SCORE ONLY IN THE AVERAGE RANGE OF PREPAREDNESS
A new Global Health Security Index released today, the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across 195 countries, suggests that not a single country in the world is fully prepared to handle an epidemic or pandemic. The GHS Index is a joint project of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), with research by The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). The Center for Health Security is a part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The inaugural GHS Index finds severe weaknesses in countries’ abilities to prevent, detect, and respond to significant disease outbreaks. The average overall 2019 GHS Index score is slightly over 40 out of a possible score of 100. Among the 60 highest-income countries assessed, the average score is 51.9.
Jennifer Nuzzo, associate professor at the Bloomberg School and senior scholar at the Center for Health Security, said the GHS Index, developed with guidance from an International Panel of Experts from 13 countries, can be used by health ministers and international organizations, philanthropists and funders, academics and researchers.
“The GHS Index finds that no country is fully prepared for naturally occurring, intentional, or accidental infectious disease outbreaks,” Nuzzo said. “Knowing that there is work to do, countries can use the index to identify gaps, build preparedness and best practices, and track progress over time.”
“Whether they be natural, accidental, or deliberate, infectious disease outbreaks can cause significant harm to health, peace, and prosperity if countries are not adequately prepared,” said Center for Health Security director Tom Inglesby. “It is important for national leaders to understand the risks that infectious diseases pose and commit to making improvements in preparedness for these events.”
The GHS Index assessed countries across six categories, 34 indicators, and 140 questions, using only open-source information and data from international organizations, including the World Health Organization, the World Organisation for Animal Health, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UN), and the World Bank.
Top findings
The Index found that:
- Fewer than 7 percent of countries score in the highest tier in the category assessing the prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens.
- Only 19 percent of countries receive top marks (scoring a 66.7 out of 100 or higher) in the category assessing early detection and reporting of epidemics of potential international concern.
- Fewer than 5 percent of countries score in the highest tier in rapid response to and mitigation of spread of an epidemic.
- With an average score of 26.4 out of 100, having a sufficient and robust health sector to treat the sick and protect health workers was the lowest-scoring category.
The GHS Index findings and recommendations for addressing significant gaps in global health security come amid an ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo and five years after the UN Security Council met in crisis over the Ebola epidemic in West Africa.
At a time when risks are magnified by a rapidly changing and interconnected world and rapid technology advances make it easier to create and engineer pathogens, knowing the risks is clearly not enough. Political will is needed to protect people from the consequence of epidemics, to take action to save lives, and to build a safer and more secure world.
Top recommendations
A core principle of the GHS Index is that health security is a collective responsibility. The GHS Index offers 33 recommendations for individual countries and for the international community. Recommendations include:
- The UN Secretary-General should call a heads-of-state-level summit by 2021 on biological threats, including a focus on financing and emergency response.
- National governments should commit to take action to address health security risks.
- Health security capacity in every country should be transparent and regularly measured, and results should be published at least once every two years.
- Leaders should improve coordination in insecure environments, especially linkages between security and public health authorities.
- New financing mechanisms should be established to fill preparedness gaps, such as a new multilateral global health security matching fund and expansion of World Bank International Development Association allocations to include preparedness.
- The UN Secretary-General should designate a permanent facilitator or unit for high-consequence biological events.
- Countries should test their health security capacities and publish after-action reviews, at least annually.
- Governments and donors should take into account countries’ political and security risk factors when supporting health security capacity development.
The GHS Index was developed over two and a half years. Key steps included an initial pilot project to test the framework; reviews by the International Panel of Experts that includes 21 experts from 13 countries; a yearlong data collection and validation process by 110 EIU researchers and reviews throughout the world; and opportunities for governments to validate data.
Learn more: Inaugural Global Health Security Index Finds Significant Gaps in Preparedness for Epidemics and Pandemics
The Latest on: Preparedness for epidemics and pandemics
[google_news title=”” keyword=”preparedness for epidemics and pandemics” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Preparedness for epidemics and pandemics
- Learning the lessons of mpox to prepare for future pandemicson April 27, 2024 at 8:42 am
Targeted support for marginalised communities, strong public messaging and a properly coordinated Government approach led by Ministers are amongst the recommendations contained in a new evidence-based ...
- New Pandemic Agreement: Pharma Wins, Developing World Loses, says AHF Global Public Health Instituteon April 26, 2024 at 11:22 am
As the final Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) meeting of the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement approaches, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and the AHF Global Public Health ...
- Experts call for global genetic warning system to combat the next pandemic and antimicrobial resistanceon April 25, 2024 at 2:00 am
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world upside down. In fighting it, one of our most important weapons was genomic surveillance, based on whole genome sequencing, which collects all the genetic data of ...
- Massive amounts of H5N1 vaccine would be needed if there’s a bird flu pandemic. Can we make enough?on April 24, 2024 at 10:53 am
The first signs that H5N1 avian flu was starting to spread from person to person would trigger a race to produce massive amounts of vaccine.
- Updated WHO Pandemic Accord Retains Commitments for Non-Exclusive Licensing and Royalty Waiverson April 24, 2024 at 10:41 am
On April 19, the World Health Organization (WHO) released an updated draft proposal of an international agreement on the global response to future pandemics.
- The WHO Pandemic Treaty Fails Againon April 18, 2024 at 5:00 pm
In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a process to update the International Health Regulations (IHR) and draft a “convention, agreement or other ...
- Experts warn about deferring hard parts of pandemic treaty for lateron April 18, 2024 at 6:03 am
The proposed resolution for the pandemic agreement will create further negotiations after May for some of the most contentious issues. But experts say deferring some of the decisions comes with ...
- How navigating Netflix’s DVD-to-streaming transition helped prepare Airbnb’s new CFO for surviving the pandemicon April 18, 2024 at 3:10 am
Ellie Mertz, an 11-year veteran of the short-term rental company, began her tenure as CFO on March 1, succeeding Dave Stephenson, who filled that position beginning in 2019 and was since been promoted ...
- Global pandemic agreement undermined by corporate interestson April 17, 2024 at 6:39 pm
The proposed agreement has been repeatedly watered down based on considerations of corporate profit and national interests.
- Opinion: The next pandemic threat demands action nowon April 17, 2024 at 1:51 pm
But with growing evidence of potential mammal-to-mammal spread just weeks after the new bird flu was detected in cows, many of us in the biosecurity and pandemic preparedness community believe that ...
via Bing News