Scientific studies of techniques for deliberately modifying the climate are getting ready to move out of the laboratory
IN 1990 John Latham, a cloud physicist, published a short article in Nature under the headline “Control of Global Warming?” It argued that if low-lying maritime clouds were made a bit brighter, the Earth could be cooled enough to make up for the increased warming caused by emissions of greenhouse gases. The brightening was to be achieved by wafting tiny sea-salt particles up into the clouds from below; by acting as “cloud condensation nuclei” (CCN) they would increase the number of water droplets in the clouds, and thus the amount of sunlight they reflect out into space. Latham calculated that a square kilometre of cloud might be kept bright with just 400 grams of spray an hour. And finding out if it was really that easy might be straightforwardly tested. “It seems feasible”, Dr Latham wrote, “to conduct an experiment in which CCN are introduced in a controlled manner into marine stratus.”
A quarter of a century on, such a test may soon be on the cards. For more than ten years Dr Latham’s idea was almost entirely ignored. Then it caught the attention of an enterprising engineer, Stephen Salter of the University of Edinburgh, who looked at ways it might be made practicable, and a small number of researchers started to pay attention. But the question of whether anyone could actually produce ship-borne sprayers that would reliably churn out particles a ten-thousandth of a millimetre in diameter at a rate of 1,000 trillion a second remained open.
Armand Neukermans, a retired Silicon Valley engineer whose achievements include, among other things, the development of the earliest inkjet printers, has with various colleagues (also mostly retired) looked at a range of possible techniques. One that may be up to the job is “effervescent spray atomisation” in which, rather than trying to make truly tiny droplets straight away, you make larger ones in which water mixed with gas subsequently fizzes into particles of the desired size.
Dr Neukermans, Thomas Ackerman and Robert Wood, the latter two both scientists who study clouds at the University of Washington, have with colleagues put together a proposal for field tests to see if such sprayers really work, if their effects can be controlled and measured, and what happens to clouds treated in this way. They are now investigating how to get such a programme financed.
The Latest on: Geoengineering experiments
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Geoengineering experiments” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering experiments
- Scientist Slams Politicians For Banning Geoengineering Experimentson April 27, 2024 at 3:00 am
A climate scientist is warning against regulatory attempts to quell weather-changing technology, which seeks to cool the planet through various means as climate change keeps heating it up. In an ...
- Controversial methods to cool earth by reflecting sunlight gain traction as global temperatures riseon April 26, 2024 at 8:05 am
Relatively untouched ideas are gaining momentum as potential short-term solutions to lower Earth's temperature.
- Solar geoengineering to cool the planet: Is it worth the risks?on April 25, 2024 at 8:53 am
When I first wrote about geoengineering in 2012 , it was considered far-fetched at best, and crazy by most. But 12 years later, while there is still controversy and considerable resistance to ...
- MIT Technology Reviewon April 23, 2024 at 1:46 pm
We need more research, including outdoor experiments, to make better-informed decisions about such climate interventions.
- Startups want to cool Earth by reflecting sunlight. There are few rules and big riskson April 23, 2024 at 12:04 am
In a parking lot and on San Francisco Bay, NPR witnesses two different tests for solar geoengineering to tackle climate change. With much science unsettled, experts say regulations aren't keeping up.
- Startups want to geoengineer a cooler planet. With few rules, experts see big riskson April 21, 2024 at 6:43 am
In a parking lot and on San Francisco Bay, NPR witnesses two different tests for solar geoengineering to tackle climate change. With much science unsettled, experts say regulations aren't keeping up.
- What is geoengineering?on April 16, 2024 at 8:35 am
What does this term mean—and why is it so controversial? In 2009 Britain’s Royal Society, a scientific academy, defined geoengineering as “the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary ...
- A Radical Experiment Shows Cloud Brightening May Be Our Climate’s White Knighton April 16, 2024 at 6:29 am
One idea is marine cloud brightening (MCB), and a new study says that MCB could also create cloud cover, making it an even better ‘painkiller’ for climate change that previously thought. However, ...
- Geoengineering Test Quietly Launches Salt Crystals into Atmosphereon April 3, 2024 at 5:00 pm
The University of Washington and SilverLining, a geoengineering research advocacy group involved in the CAARE project, declined interview requests. The mayor of Alameda, where the experiment is ...
- MIT Technology Reviewon April 3, 2024 at 5:00 pm
“The experiment became this proxy for a kind of debate about whether solar geoengineering research should move forward,” Keith says. “And that’s, I think, the ultimate reason why Frank and ...
via Bing News