New power plant design could provide enhanced safety, easier siting, and centralized construction.
When an earthquake and tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant complex in 2011, neither the quake nor the inundation caused the ensuing contamination. Rather, it was the aftereffects — specifically, the lack of cooling for the reactor cores, due to a shutdown of all power at the station — that caused most of the harm.
A new design for nuclear plants built on floating platforms, modeled after those used for offshore oil drilling, could help avoid such consequences in the future. Such floating plants would be designed to be automatically cooled by the surrounding seawater in a worst-case scenario, which would indefinitely prevent any melting of fuel rods, or escape of radioactive material.
The concept is being presented this week at the Small Modular Reactors Symposium, hosted by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, by MIT professors Jacopo Buongiorno, Michael Golay, and Neil Todreas, along with others from MIT, the University of Wisconsin, and Chicago Bridge and Iron, a major nuclear plant and offshore platform construction company.
Such plants, Buongiorno explains, could be built in a shipyard, then towed to their destinations five to seven miles offshore, where they would be moored to the seafloor and connected to land by an underwater electric transmission line. The concept takes advantage of two mature technologies: light-water nuclear reactors and offshore oil and gas drilling platforms. Using established designs minimizes technological risks, says Buongiorno, an associate professor of nuclear science and engineering (NSE) at MIT.
Although the concept of a floating nuclear plant is not unique — Russia is in the process of building one now, on a barge moored at the shore — none have been located far enough offshore to be able to ride out a tsunami, Buongiorno says. For this new design, he says, “the biggest selling point is the enhanced safety.”
A floating platform several miles offshore, moored in about 100 meters of water, would be unaffected by the motions of a tsunami; earthquakes would have no direct effect at all. Meanwhile, the biggest issue that faces most nuclear plants under emergency conditions — overheating and potential meltdown, as happened at Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island — would be virtually impossible at sea, Buongiorno says: “It’s very close to the ocean, which is essentially an infinite heat sink, so it’s possible to do cooling passively, with no intervention. The reactor containment itself is essentially underwater.”
Buongiorno lists several other advantages. For one thing, it is increasingly difficult and expensive to find suitable sites for new nuclear plants: They usually need to be next to an ocean, lake, or river to provide cooling water, but shorefront properties are highly desirable. By contrast, sites offshore, but out of sight of land, could be located adjacent to the population centers they would serve. “The ocean is inexpensive real estate,” Buongiorno says.
In addition, at the end of a plant’s lifetime, “decommissioning” could be accomplished by simply towing it away to a central facility, as is done now for the Navy’s carrier and submarine reactors. That would rapidly restore the site to pristine conditions.
This design could also help to address practical construction issues that have tended to make new nuclear plants uneconomical: Shipyard construction allows for better standardization, and the all-steel design eliminates the use of concrete, which Buongiorno says is often responsible for construction delays and cost overruns.
There are no particular limits to the size of such plants, he says: They could be anywhere from small, 50-megawatt plants to 1,000-megawatt plants matching today’s largest facilities. “It’s a flexible concept,” Buongiorno says.
Most operations would be similar to those of onshore plants, and the plant would be designed to meet all regulatory security requirements for terrestrial plants. “Project work has confirmed the feasibility of achieving this goal, including satisfaction of the extra concern of protection against underwater attack,” says Todreas, the KEPCO Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Mechanical Engineering.
Buongiorno sees a market for such plants in Asia, which has a combination of high tsunami risks and a rapidly growing need for new power sources. “It would make a lot of sense for Japan,” he says, as well as places such as Indonesia, Chile, and Africa.
This is a “very attractive and promising proposal,” says Toru Obara, a professor at the Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors at the Tokyo Institute of Technology who was not involved in this research. “I think this is technically very feasible. … Of course, further study is needed to realize the concept, but the authors have the answers to each question and the answers are realistic.”
The Latest on: Nuclear plants
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Nuclear plants” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Nuclear plants
- NNSA collaborates with Japan, Korea on research reactorson May 1, 2024 at 7:55 am
The US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has signed bilateral agreements with Japan and South Korea to cooperate in optimising the nuclear non-proliferation ...
- The Stage Is Set for a Resurgence of Nuclear Power in the U.S.on May 1, 2024 at 7:00 am
The US government is expected to reopen shuttered nuclear power plants to meet the increasing demand for clean energy, with the Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan set to be the first to reopen in ...
- Princeton’s new pinhole-camera-like tool promises better nuclear fusionon May 1, 2024 at 6:03 am
ALPACA, the instrument measures the light emitted by the halo of neutral atoms surrounding plasma in tokamak reactors.
- Georgia's Plant Vogtle Activates Second Nuclear Reactor Amid Soaring $31 Billion Costson April 30, 2024 at 8:58 am
Georgia Power started Unit 4 at Plant Vogtle, facing high costs of $31 billion, exceeding initial budgets and timelines for its carbon-free energy.
- Georgia's second nuclear reactor comes online, may be most expensive power plant ever built at around $35Bon April 30, 2024 at 7:21 am
Georgia's second new nuclear reactor is now operational. Each can power 500,000 homes and businesses, but the project exceeded both cost and timeline projections.
- EU approves Czech state aid for nuclear power plant constructionon April 30, 2024 at 1:47 am
The European Commission said on Tuesday it had approved state aid offered by the Czech Republic for the construction of a nuclear power plant.
- Ninth Circuit clears way for Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant license extensionon April 29, 2024 at 3:42 pm
(CN) — The Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant's new lease on life cleared another hurdle on Monday when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a challenge to a license extension granted by the ...
- A Massive U.S. Nuclear Plant Is Finally Complete. It Might Be the Last of Its Kind.on April 29, 2024 at 2:37 pm
A new nuclear reactor reached commercial operation in Georgia on Monday, completing a project whose delays and sticker shock helped upend the near-term prospects for nuclear power in the U.S.
- Palisades reopening signals shift toward restarting other nuclear plantson April 29, 2024 at 1:15 pm
While environmentalists remain opposed to nuclear plants, others see them as a way to produce big amounts of power without spewing greenhouse gases.
- Plant Vogtle Unit 4 nuclear reactor enters commercial operation, says Georgia Poweron April 29, 2024 at 8:08 am
With all four units now in operation, Plant Vogtle is expected to produce more than 30 million megawatt hours of electricity each year.
via Bing News