Majority wants both punishment for tax evaders and things to go fine for themselves
In most modern states, central institutions are funded by public taxation. This means, however, that tax evaders must also be punished. Once such a system has been established, it is also good for the community: it makes co-existence easier and it helps maintain common standards. However, such advantageous institutions do not come about by themselves. The community must first agree that such a common punishment authority makes sense and decide what powers it should be given. Climate protection is a case in point, demonstrating that this cannot always be achieved. But how can a community agree on sensible institutions and self-limitations?
The Max Planck researchers allowed participants in a modified public goods game to decide whether to pay taxes towards a policing institution with their starting capital. They were additionally able to pay money into a common pot. The total paid in was then tripled and paid out to all participants. If taxes had been paid beforehand, free riders who did not contribute to the group pot were punished by the police. In the absence of taxation, however, there would be no police and the group would run the risk that no-one would pay into the common pot.
Police punishment of both free riders and tax evaders quickly established cooperative behaviour in the experiment. If, however, tax evaders were not punished, the opposite happened and the participants avoided paying taxes. Without policing, there was no longer any incentive to pay into the group pot, so reducing the profits for the group members. Ultimately, each individual thus benefits if tax evaders are punished.
But can participants foresee this development? To find out, the scientists gave the participants a choice: they were now able to choose individually whether they joined a group in which the police also punish tax evaders. Alternatively, they could choose a group in which only those participants who did not pay into the common pot were penalised. Faced with this choice, the majority preferred a community without punishment for tax evaders – with the result that virtually no taxes were paid and, subsequently, that contributions to the group pot also fell.
In a second experimental scenario, the players were instead able to decide by democratic vote whether, for all subsequent rounds, the police should be authorised to punish tax evaders as well as free riders or only free riders. In this case, the players clearly voted for institutions in which tax evaders were also punished. “People are often prepared to impose rules on themselves, but only if they know that these rules apply to everyone,” summarises Christian Hilbe, the lead author of the study. A majority decision ensures that all participants are equally affected by the outcome of the vote. This makes it easier to introduce rules and institutions which, while demanding individual sacrifice, are best for the group.
The Latest on: Democracy
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Democracy” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Democracy
- State of Judiciary demands that we defend Guam’s democracy togetheron April 30, 2024 at 9:56 pm
The State of the Judiciary demands that we defend Guam’s democracy and we must do it together. Supreme Court of Guam Chief Justice Robert Torres shared those words during his speech in the Guam ...
- The Atlantic Announces Democracy at a Crossroads, a Multi-state College Tour on the Crucial Issues in This Electionon April 30, 2024 at 12:10 pm
First event May 2 at the University of Nevada, Reno with Elaina Plott Calabro, Adam Harris, Ron Brownstein, and Evan Smith.
- Rodricks: Biden's energy agenda is no threat to democracyon April 30, 2024 at 12:10 pm
At age 73, Bill Barr is eligible for Social Security and Medicare, but I trust he’s been refusing those benefits. The former U.S. attorney general thinks the greatest threat to our democracy is “the ...
- The Supreme Court is poised to trash the rule of law and wreck our democracy | Moranon April 30, 2024 at 12:06 pm
And that’s not even the worst news to emerge from the Supreme Court’s hearing last week on Trump’s claim of immunity from criminal prosecution. The scary part is that most of the conservative justices ...
- Biden’s judicial nominees are a genuine threat to American democracyon April 30, 2024 at 12:03 pm
President Joe Biden has nominated a plethora of radical left-wing judicial activists for judges throughout the country.
- If Trump wins, it won't just be danger to our democracy posed by him, author warnson April 30, 2024 at 5:04 am
Brookings Institute Senior Fellow Robert Kagan joins Morning Joe to discuss his new book 'Rebellion: How Antiliberalism Is Tearing America Apart--Again'.
- My Take: Our democracy is facing a 'perfect storm'on April 30, 2024 at 12:01 am
Trump has made it implicitly clear that his quest for the presidency has nothing to do with the good of the nation but is instead designed to personally insulate him from criminal prosecution.
- To save democracy, one place to start is in churchon April 29, 2024 at 12:23 pm
“Just maybe, if we want to save democracy, one place to start would be to rebuild democratic habits in our congregations.” ...
- The best way to fix a democracyon April 29, 2024 at 3:00 am
Surveys tell us that people around the world are not too enthusiastic about democracies, but few want to change to a different form of government. The change voters do want? Better politicians who ...
- Ruts on both the right and left are subverting our democracyon April 28, 2024 at 8:00 pm
It is important to note that it’s not just one side of the political aisle that is subverting democracy — both are. On the road toward our nation’s future, both the right and the left have worn deep ...
via Bing News