
Extended activity-based training with epidural stimulation resulted in ability to stand and move without stimulation
A research participant at the University of Louisville with a complete spinal cord injury, who had lost motor function below the level of the injury, has regained the ability to move his legs voluntarily and stand six years after his injury.
A study published today in Scientific Reports describes the recovery of motor function in a research participant who previously had received long-term activity-based training along with spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES). In the article, senior author Susan Harkema, Ph.D., professor and associate director of the Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center (KSCIRC) at the University of Louisville, and her colleagues, report that over the course of 34.5 months following the original training, the participant recovered substantial voluntary lower-limb motor control and the ability to stand independently without the use of scES.
“Activity-dependent plasticity can re-establish voluntary control of movement and standing after complete paralysis in humans even years after injury,” Harkema said. “This should open up new opportunities for recovery-based rehabilitation as an agent for recovery, not just learning how to function with compensatory strategies, even for those with the most severe injuries.”
Previous research at KSCIRC involving four participants with chronic clinically motor-complete spinal cord injury found that activity-based training with the use of scES – electrical signals delivered to motor neurons in the spine by an implanted device – allowed the participants to stand and to perform relatively fine voluntary lower limb movements when the scES device was activated. Andrew Meas was one of the four participants in that study.
The original training protocol included daily one-hour activity-based training sessions with the aid of epidural stimulation. During these sessions, the participant trained on standing activity for several months, followed by several months of training on stepping.
After completing a nine-month training program in the lab, Meas continued activity-based stand training at home. After a year of independent training, he returned to the lab to train for three months in a revised activity-based training schedule. The revised training called for two daily one-hour training sessions and included both stand and step training each day, all with the aid of epidural stimulation.
After that training, Meas was able to voluntarily extend his knees and his hip flexion was improved. In addition, using his upper body and minimal additional assistance to reach a standing position, he was able to remain in a standing position without assistance and even stand on one leg, without the use of epidural stimulation.
“We observed that in participants we have worked with so far, eight months of activity-based training with stimulation did not lead to any improvement without stimulation,” said Enrico Rejc, Ph.D., assistant professor in the UofL Department of Neurological Surgery and the article’s first author. “This participant kept training at home and, after several months, he came back to the lab and we tried a different training protocol. After a couple of months of training with the new protocol, we surprisingly observed that he was able to stand without any stimulation – with two legs and with one leg – using only his hands for balance control.”
The authors suggest that several mechanisms may be responsible for Meas’s recovery of mobility, including the sprouting of axons from above the point of injury into areas below the lesion. Another possible explanation may be that the activity-based training with scES promoted remodelling of connections among neurons in the spinal cord.
In addition, they suggest that the participant’s own effort at voluntary movement may have been a factor in the recovery. During the revised training, Meas was attentive and focused on the trained motor task, actively attempting to contribute to the motor output.
“The voluntary component of him trying constantly with spinal stimulation on and while performing motor tasks can lead to unexpected recovery,” Rejc said.
“The human nervous system can recover from severe spinal cord injury even years after injury. In this case, he was implanted with the stimulator four years after his injury. We saw motor recovery two years later—so six years after injury,” Rejc said. “It is commonly believed that one year from injury, you are classified as chronic and it’s likely that you will not improve any more. This data is proof of principle that the human nervous system has much greater recovery capabilities than expected.”
Learn more: Individual with complete spinal cord injury regains voluntary motor function
The Latest on: Spinal cord injury
[google_news title=”” keyword=”spinal cord injury” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]- Third Frontier grants go to early-stage development of spinal cord injury, autoimmune therapieson July 24, 2024 at 9:52 am
Third Frontier awarded commercialization grants to LAACClamp Inc. for an implantable device meant to be used during open heart surgery to prevent strokes, and to Protein Capture Science LLC for the ...
- Research aims to bring back mobility to those with spinal issueson July 23, 2024 at 5:46 am
Researchers are getting closer to a world where a spinal cord injury does not mean a life confined to a wheelchair.
- Exploring how astrocytes respond to spinal cord injury or stroke-induced tissue damageon July 18, 2024 at 8:30 am
Past neuroscience studies found that when the central nervous system (CNS) is damaged, for instance following a stroke or spinal cord injuries, the lesions become surrounded by borders of newly ...
- Spinal Implants and Devices Market Poised for Significant Growth, Expected to Reach USD 22.39 Billion by 2032, According to Straits Researchon July 16, 2024 at 7:40 am
Spinal Implants and Devices Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product (Spinal Fusion Implants, Spinal Bone Stimulators, Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) Devices, Motion Preservation ...
- Reverse engineering spinal-cord injuryon July 15, 2024 at 5:00 pm
A huge database of the biochemical effects of spinal-cord injury has yielded a gene therapy that gets paralysed mice walking again.
- Navigating Complex Medical Evidence in Spinal Cord Injury Caseson July 15, 2024 at 1:14 am
Due to the intricate medical evidence involved, spinal cord injury cases present unique challenges in legal proceedings. Attorneys specializing in this field play a crucial role in deciphering and ...
- Nanosized sensor could help advance treatment for spinal cord disease, injuryon July 11, 2024 at 2:03 pm
Implantable technologies have significantly improved our ability to study and even modulate the activity of neurons in the brain, but neurons in the spinal cord are harder to study in action.
- Engineers' probe could help advance treatment for spinal cord disease, injuryon July 10, 2024 at 5:00 pm
a feat that could lead to the development of better treatments for spinal cord disease and injury. Implantable technologies have significantly improved our ability to study and even modulate the ...
- Rice engineers’ probe could help advance treatment for spinal cord disease, injuryon July 10, 2024 at 5:00 pm
Rice neuroscientists have used a nanosized sensor to record spinal cord neurons in free-moving mice, a feat that could lead to the development of better treatments for spinal cord disease and injury.
- Men with spinal cord injuries become fathers thanks to rare fertility treatment at Miami clinicon July 6, 2024 at 3:30 am
A spinal cord injury can be life-altering – and the potential for infertility is often a devastating blow as well.Among men who experience spinal cord injuries (SCIs) in the U.S., nearly eight in 10 ...
via Google News and Bing News