A new analysis shows that air capture could cost less than $100 a ton.
While avoiding the worst dangers of climate change will likely require sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky, prominent scientists have long dismissed such technologies as far too expensive.
But a detailed new analysis published today in the journal Joule finds that direct air capture may be practical after all. The study concludes it would cost between $94 and $232 per ton of captured carbon dioxide, if existing technologies were implemented on a commercial scale. One earlier estimate, published in Proceedings of the National Academies,put that figure at more than $1,000 (though the calculations were made on what’s known as an avoided-cost basis, which would add about 10 percent to the new study’s figures).
Crucially, the lowest-cost design, optimized to produce and sell alternative fuels made from the captured carbon dioxide, could already be profitable with existing public policies in certain markets (see “The carbon-capture era may finally be starting”). The higher cost estimates are for plants that would deliver compressed carbon dioxide for permanent underground storage.
Making direct air capture as cheap as possible is critical because a growing body of work finds it’s going to be nearly impossible to prevent global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 ?C without rolling out some form of the technology on a huge scale. By some estimates, the world will emit enough greenhouse gases to lock in that level of warming within a few years. At that point, one of the only ways to reverse the effects is to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, where it otherwise persists for thousands of years.
David Keith, a Harvard physics professor and lead author of the paper, says the findings should shift the perception of direct air capture from “vaporware” to “something that can be built with current industrial technologies now.”
Keith is also the founder of Carbon Engineering, a Calgary-based startup that has spent the last nine years designing, refining, and testing a direct air capture pilot plant in Squamish, British Columbia. (See “Go inside an industrial plant that sucks carbon dioxide straight out of the air.”) The study, partially funded by the US Department of Energy, simulates a scaled-up version, based on the facility’s actual performance and cost data.
“I hope it’s a real change in the community’s view of the technology,” Keith says.
In 2011, a pair of influential papers all but sounded the death knell for direct air capture, concluding that the approach would cost nearly an order of magnitude more than capturing the greenhouse gas from power-plant stacks.
“It’d be such a great solution—if it were real,” MIT Energy Initiative senior researcher Howard Herzog, who coauthored the study that found costs could top $1,000 a ton, said at the time.
In an interview this week, Herzog complimented the detailed analysis in the new study, but said he remains skeptical of some of its financial assumptions. He expects that Carbon Engineering will face higher costs and challenges than it anticipates as the company moves to build larger plants.
“Until you really can confirm the costs and performance at scale, you’ve always got to take those costs with a grain of salt,” he says. “I still think a final number could be several times as much.”
The cost differences from the earlier studies arise mainly from different design choices. Those include the use of horizontally rather than vertically stacked structures, lower energy demands due to improved heat integration in the process, and the power sources selected to run the plant.
Carbon Engineering plans to combine the carbon captured at its plants with hydrogen to produce carbon-neutral synthetic fuels, a process the pilot facility has already been performing. Such fuels are more expensive than standard gasoline and diesel, so the size and stability of the market for them will depend largely on whether subsidies are in place.
Carbon Engineering has secured $30 million to date. It’s currently seeking additional funds to build a larger facility that will begin selling fuels, though still on a relatively small scale.
But those carbon-neutral fuels won’t directly help to reduce carbon in the atmosphere (unless they’re used in systems that capture carbon as well). To make real gains in removing greenhouse gases, the world may eventually need to permanently store massive amounts of captured carbon dioxide, rather than releasing it again when synthetic fuels burn. Doing that on a large scale would almost surely require significant cost reductions, a high price on carbon, or other public policy support.
Keith says producing synthetic fuels offers a sustainable business model that could help companies scale up and reduce the costs of the technology, easing the path to that eventual goal.
But Herzog, who has also studied the challenges of converting carbon dioxide into fuel, remains skeptical that the numbers will work even for that initial business model.
“It’s very tough, and even tougher if the CO2 is from your most expensive source, which is the air,” he says.
Learn more: Maybe we can afford to suck CO2 out of the sky after all
The Latest on: Air capture
[google_news title=”” keyword=”air capture” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Air capture
- It's 'NOT racist to air concerns' about migration! BBC blasted over impartiality risk as review tears into broadcaster for dodging key voiceson May 7, 2024 at 5:00 pm
BBC journalists have been told that it is "not racist" to "air concerns" about immigration as a review investigates ... sites over Cameron’s Ukraine weapons pledge F1 paddock cameras capture Lewis ...
- iPad Air 2024: 2 new features that iPad Air 2022 doesn't haveon May 7, 2024 at 10:50 am
The iPad Air is now more similar to the iPad Pro more than ever. Like the iPad Pro, which comes two flavors (i.e., 12.9-inch and 11-inch models), the iPad Air now comes in two variants, too: 11-inch ...
- Apple Event Live Blog: New iPad Pro, iPad Air, and Moreon May 7, 2024 at 6:34 am
Apple's "Let Loose" event kicks off today at the unusual time of 7:00 a.m. Pacific Time, and we're expecting to see an ...
- New direct air capture plant poised for record removalson May 7, 2024 at 3:38 am
Mammoth likely won’t be the largest direct air capture facility for long. In West Texas, Occidental Petroleum is constructing a DAC plant known as Stratos that is designed to remove up to 500,000 ...
- Apple’s first 13-inch iPad Air debuts at $799 next weekon May 7, 2024 at 12:21 am
The 13-inch iPad Air has 30 percent more screen real estate than its smaller ... subject lift, and live text capture. The new Airs will also have a front-facing, ultrawide 12MP camera that supports ...
- The new iPad Air comes in two sizes, including a 13-inch modelon May 7, 2024 at 12:10 am
The wide 12MP camera on the rear supports 4K video capture at up to 240 fps. The new iPad Air has dual microphones that can minimize background audio, Apple says, while the stereo landscape speakers ...
- Exxon Mobil Plays It Safe With Hydrocarbons, Sidelines Direct Air Captureon May 6, 2024 at 6:38 am
Exxon Mobil may experience a cyclical upswing in their chemicals and energy products businesses in 2h24-2025. Find out if XOM stock is a buy.
- This startup is using protein powder to beef up carbon captureon May 6, 2024 at 5:09 am
UK startup FabricNano has teamed up with Veolia to mix protein powder with dust and through it on fields in a bid to speed up carbon capture.
- Inspired by Cheerios: Scientists Develop New More Efficient Way To Capture Fresh Water From the Airon May 5, 2024 at 12:17 pm
A more efficient way to capture fresh water from the air could be inspired by a phenomenon of motion first glimpsed in bowls of breakfast cereal. KAUST researchers have observed that, when water ...
via Bing News