Pro
New Cornell University research finds while journalists and professional fact-checkers struggle to keep up with the deluge of misinformation online, sites that rely on loosely coordinated contributions from volunteers, such as Wikipedia, can help fill the gaps.
In the study, researchers compared professional fact-checking articles to posts on Cofacts, a community-sourced fact-checking platform in Taiwan. They found the crowdsourced site often responded to queries more rapidly than professionals and handled a different range of issues across platforms.
“Fact-checking is a core component of being able to use our information ecosystem in a way that supports trustworthy information,” said senior author Mor Naaman, professor of information science. “Places of knowledge production, like Wikipedia and Cofacts, have proved so far to be the most robust to misinformation campaigns.”
Andy Zhao, a doctoral candidate in information science, used natural language processing to match up responses posted on Cofacts with articles addressing the same questions on two professional fact-checking sites. He looked at how quickly the sites posted responses to queries, the accuracy and persuasiveness of the responses and the range of topics covered.
He found the Cofacts users often responded faster than journalists, but mostly because they could “stand on the shoulders of giants” and repurpose existing articles from professionals. In this way, Cofacts acts as a distributor for information.
Importantly, Zhao found that the Cofacts posts were just as accurate as the professional sources. And according to seven native Taiwanese graduate students who acted as raters, articles by journalists were more persuasive, but Cofacts posts often were clearer.
Further analysis showed the crowdsourced site covered a slightly different range of topics compared with those addressed by professionals. Posts on Cofacts were more likely to address recent and local issues – such as regional politics and small-time scams – while journalists were more likely to write about topics requiring expertise, including health claims and international affairs.
“We can leverage the power of the crowds to counter misinformation,” Zhao concluded. “Misinformation comes from everywhere, and we need this battle to happen in all corners.”
Despite the success of Cofacts in Taiwan, Zhao and Naaman caution that the same approach may not transfer to other countries. “Cofacts has built on the user habits, the cultures, the background, and political and social structures of Taiwan, which is how they succeed,” Zhao said.
But understanding Cofacts’ success may assist in the design of other fact-checking systems, especially in regions that don’t speak English, which have access to few, if any fact-checking resources.
Original Article: Crowdsourced fact-checking fights misinformation in Taiwan
More from: Cornell University
The Latest Updates from Bing News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Crowdsourced fact-checking
- Elon Musk joins controversy over new Canadian bill that would let citizens seek damages for online hate speech
Elon Musk joins controversy over new Canadian bill that would let citizens seek damages for online hate speech - The Online Harms Bill would create a new government body to regulate hate speech on soc ...
- That Creepy Photo of Mike Lindell at a Trump Rally Is Totally Fake
Have you seen a photo of MyPillow CEO and big-time Trump backer Mike Lindell looking spaced out, with dark circles under his eyes? It’s gone viral on social media, racking up millions of views. But it ...
- That Creepy Photo of Mike Lindell at a Trump Rally Is Totally Fake
The tweet alone has over 6.3 million views and doesn’t include an annotation from Community Notes, the name for X’s crowdsourced fact-checking. But the image has spread far and wide ...
- Elon Musk admits to running burner account where he pretended to be his 3-year-old child
Musk tagged @CommunityNotes in the post—X’s crowdsourced fact-checking system—something he pointed to as exculpatory under questioning in the deposition. “I think I really did this in good ...
- Poll-time fact-check tool 'Community Notes': Crowdsourced X feature makes India debut
X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, is rolling out its crowdsourced fact-checking tool Community Notes in India, weeks before the Lok Sabha elections. Elon Musk, who owns X, has on several ...
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Fact-checking
- Fact-checking claims about who's behind pro-Palestinian student protests
Some have claimed that outsiders are backing pro-Palestinian student protests at campuses across the U.S. and Canada. CBC’s Ben Makuch fact-checks those claims to find out what’s really happening.
- Commitment 2024: Fact-checking former President Trump's claims in interview
During an interview with WTAE's sister station WGAL, Trump made claims of getting record-breaking votes in Pennsylvania's 2024 primary, about the future of abortion in the courts, and concerning who ...
- Fact Checking False Claims That Kate Middleton's Return Could Take "Many Years"
Here's what we know about when Kate Middleton is making her return to royal duties and coming back, from the palace, royal sources, and the princess herself.
- Fact-checking Joe Biden on the economy in CNN interview
President Joe Biden repeated several claims about the economy during a May 8 interview with CNN’s Erin Burnett. A day earlier, PolitiFact published a similar assessment of claims about the economy ...
- Fact-checking Noem book tour that ended abruptly
After several controversial appearances, Governor Kristi Noem abruptly canceled at least two national interviews on her book tour. Now that her book, "No Going Back," has been released, interviewers ...