Participants rated from 1 to 5 stars the ethical decision of either a human or an AI driver.
(Image courtesy of Johann Caro-Burnett, Hiroshima University)
With the accelerating evolution of technology, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a growing role in decision-making processes. Humans are becoming increasingly dependent on algorithms to process information, recommend certain behaviors, and even take actions of their behalf. A research team has studied how humans react to the introduction of AI decision making. Specifically, they explored the question, “is society ready for AI ethical decision making?” by studying human interaction with autonomous cars.
The team published their findings on May 6, 2022, in the Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.
In the first of two experiments, the researchers presented 529 human subjects with an ethical dilemma a driver might face. In the scenario the researchers created, the car driver had to decide whether to crash the car into one group of people or another – the collision was unavoidable. The crash would cause severe harm to one group of people, but would save the lives of the other group. The subjects in the study had to rate the car driver’s decision, when the driver was a human and also when the driver was AI. This first experiment was designed to measure the bias people might have against AI ethical decision making.
In their second experiment, 563 human subjects responded to the researchers’ questions. The researchers determined how people react to the debate over AI ethical decisions once they become part of social and political discussions. In this experiment, there were two scenarios. One involved a hypothetical government that had already decided to allow autonomous cars to make ethical decisions. Their other scenario allowed the subjects to “vote” whether to allow the autonomous cars to make ethical decisions. In both cases, the subjects could choose to be in favor of or against the decisions made by the technology. This second experiment was designed to test the effect of two alternative ways of introducing AI into society.
The researchers observed that when the subjects were asked to evaluate the ethical decisions of either a human or AI driver, they did not have a definitive preference for either. However, when the subjects were asked their explicit opinion on whether a driver should be allowed to make ethical decisions on the road, the subjects had a stronger opinion against AI-operated cars. The researchers believe that the discrepancy between the two results is caused by a combination of two elements.
The first element is that individual people believe society as a whole does not want AI ethical decision making, and so they assign a positive weight to their beliefs when asked for their opinion on the matter. “Indeed, when participants are asked explicitly to separate their answers from those of society, the difference between the permissibility for AI and human drivers vanishes,” said Johann Caro-Burnett, an assistant professor in the Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University.
The second element is that when introducing this new technology into society, allowing discussion of the topic has mixed results depending on the country. “In regions where people trust their government and have strong political institutions, information and decision-making power improve how subjects evaluate the ethical decisions of AI. In contrast, in regions where people do not trust their government and have weak political institutions, decision-making capability deteriorates how subjects evaluate the ethical decisions of AI,” said Caro-Burnett.
“We find that there is a social fear of AI ethical decision-making. However, the source of this fear is not intrinsic to individuals. Indeed, this rejection of AI comes from what individuals believe is the society’s opinion,” said Shinji Kaneko, a professor in the Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, and the Network for Education and Research on Peace and Sustainability. So when not being asked explicitly, people do not show any signs of bias against AI ethical decision-making. However, when asked explicitly, people show an aversion to AI. Furthermore, where there is added discussion and information on the topic, the acceptance of AI improves in developed countries and worsens in developing countries.
The researchers believe this rejection of a new technology, that is mostly due to incorporating individuals’ beliefs about society’s opinion, is likely to apply in other machines and robots. “Therefore, it will be important to determine how to aggregate individual preferences into one social preference. Moreover, this task will also have to be different across countries, as our results suggest,” said Kaneko.
Original Article: Researchers study society’s readiness for AI ethical decision making
More from: Hiroshima University
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Artificial intelligence ethical decision making
- Deployment of AI technology must be approached with ethical rigour — Catholic Bishops
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria (CBCN) has said that despite its enormous advantages, the deployment of artificial intelligence must be approached with ethical rigour.The President of CBCN ...
- In an Era of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Human Touch Is Needed
While AI can assist with some decisions, it’s feasible that, at some level, overreliance on these technological capabilities ...
- Progressive Role of Artificial Intelligence in Treatment Decision - Making in the Field of Medical Oncology
Artificial intelligence (AI) has started to play an important role in oncologic medicine today, focusing mainly on oncologic diagnosis (by helping in cancer radiology & pathology) and radiation ...
- Implementing ethical AI for FIs
While AI offers significant benefits to the financial sector, such as personalised customer experiences or optimised risk management, it also poses ethical risks. This becomes particularly clear when ...
- A physicists’ guide to the ethics of artificial intelligence
Physics may seem like its own world, but different sectors using machine learning are all part of the same universe.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Artificial intelligence ethical decision making
[google_news title=”” keyword=”artificial intelligence ethical decision making” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
Go deeper with Bing News on:
AI ethical decision making
- The right way to hire an AI-ready workforce
Enhance your talent acquisition strategy with structured interviewing for AI-ready employees. Avoid hiring mistakes and boost productivity, ...
- UK Invests £12 Million to Address Challenges of Rapid AI Development
UK government has agreed on £12 million for a set of disruptive projects devoted to the right decision-making when the significant development of artificial intelligence threatens the deepening of the ...
- AI Ethics Surpass Human Judgment in New Moral Turing Test
AI's ability to address moral questions is improving, which prompts further considerations for the future. A recent study revealed that when individuals are given two solutions to a moral dilemma, the ...
- Implementing ethical AI for FIs
While AI offers significant benefits to the financial sector, such as personalised customer experiences or optimised risk management, it also poses ethical risks. This becomes particularly clear when ...
- AI Use in Court Is Ethical When Used Correctly | Opinion
AI should be used to better society, enable people to do their jobs with fewer limits, and allow them to better practice law, write briefs, and advise clients.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
AI ethical decision making
[google_news title=”” keyword=”AI ethical decision making” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]