Separating fact from fiction in the age of alternate facts is becoming increasingly difficult, and now a new study has helped reveal why.
Research by Dr Eryn Newman of The Australian National University (ANU) has found that when people listen to recordings of a scientist presenting their work, the quality of audio had a significant impact on whether people believed what they were hearing, regardless of who the researcher was or what they were talking about.
Dr Newman, of the ANU Research School of Psychology, said the results showed when it comes to communicating science, style can triumph over substance.
“When people are assessing the credibility of information, most of the time people are making a judgement based on how something feels,” Dr Newman said.
“Our results showed that when the sound quality was poor, the participants thought the researcher wasn’t as intelligent, they didn’t like them as much and found their research less important.“
The study used experiments where people viewed video clips of scientists speaking at conferences. One group of participants heard the recordings in clear high-quality audio, while the other group heard the same recordings with poor-quality audio.
Participants were then asked to evaluate the researchers and their work. Those who listened to the poorer quality audio consistently evaluated the scientists as less intelligent and their research as less important.
In a second experiment, researchers upped the ante and conducted the same experiment using renowned scientists discussing their work on the well-known US Science Friday radio program. This time the recordings included audio of the scientists being introduced with their qualifications and institutional affiliations.
“It made no difference,” she said.
“As soon as we reduced the audio quality, all of a sudden the scientists and their research lost credibility.”
As with the first experiments, participants thought the research was worse, the scientists were less competent and they also reported finding their work less interesting.
Dr Newman said in a time when genuine science is struggling to be heard above fake news and alternate facts, researchers need to consider not only the content of their messages, but features of the delivery.
“Another recent study showed false information travels six times faster than real information on Twitter,” she said.
“Our results show that it’s not just about who you are and what you are saying, it’s about how your work is presented.”
Learn more:Â What makes someone believe or reject information?
The Latest on: What makes someone believe or reject information?
[google_news title=”” keyword=”What makes someone believe or reject information?” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: What makes someone believe or reject information?
- When ‘Stop the Steal’ Becomes Your Mottoon May 16, 2024 at 10:03 pm
It’s much too early to say whether the polls are right or wrong. What we can say, however, is that the former president and his allies are already laying the foundation for an effort to contest — or ...
- Long Dismissed, Chronic Lyme Disease Is Finally Getting Its Momenton May 16, 2024 at 11:38 am
Over the next two decades, Gray’s neurological issues continued and she progressively developed new symptoms: numbness and tingling in her back, chronic pain, anxiety, and an uncontrollable rage that ...
- Perils of the Antisemitism Awareness Acton May 15, 2024 at 1:24 pm
Can an idea be dangerous? Can a dangerous idea be expressed? Can the government punish ideas it deems to be dangerous?
- Deepfake technology: What is it, how does it work, and what can it be used for?on May 14, 2024 at 5:00 pm
Ricky went to investigate what a deepfake is, and what they are used for. Newsround has been investigating what a deepfake is, and what they are used for. Deepfakes are videos, picture or audio ...
- Race and sprinting: What is behind Olympic podium race divide?on May 13, 2024 at 4:14 pm
Elite sprinting is dominated by black athletes. Theories as to why span painful history and cutting-edge science - and many are unproven.
- ‘Doing your own research’ can make fake news seem believableon May 7, 2024 at 10:04 am
While it’s healthy to question what we see and hear in the media, those quick internet searches to fact-check news stories can unexpectedly backfire and lead people to believe false stories, according ...
- 42 Myths People Believe to Be True Even Though They Are Clearly Noton May 3, 2024 at 5:01 pm
Have you ever encountered someone who believes in a myth that just made you facepalm? How can people still think that eating crusts will make your hair curly or that Santa Claus is real?
- Thousands Believe Covid Vaccines Harmed Them. Is Anyone Listening?on May 3, 2024 at 2:00 am
All vaccines have at least occasional side effects. But people who say they were injured by Covid vaccines believe their cases have been ignored.
- 12 Things People Believe in That Defy Logicon April 13, 2024 at 6:28 am
But some people hang on to or even live their lives by concepts that are either false or just plain bizarre. Here are 12 things people believe in that boggle the mind.
via Bing News