It is wartime. You and your fellow refugees are hiding from enemy soldiers, when a baby begins to cry. You cover her mouth to block the sound. If you remove your hand, her crying will draw the attention of the soldiers, who will kill everyone. If you smother the child, you’ll save yourself and the others.
If you were in that situation, which was dramatized in the final episode of the ’70s and ’80s TV series “M.A.S.H.,” what would you do?
The results of a new UCLA study suggest that scientists could make a good guess based on how the brain responds when people watch someone else experience pain. The study found that those responses predict whether people will be inclined to avoid causing harm to others when facing moral dilemmas.
“The findings give us a glimpse into what is the nature of morality,” said Dr. Marco Iacoboni, director of the Neuromodulation Lab at UCLA’s Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center and the study’s senior author. “This is a foundational question to understand ourselves, and to understand how the brain shapes our own nature.”
In the study, which was published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Iacoboni and colleagues analyzed mirror neurons, brain cells that respond equally when someone performs an action or simply watches someone else perform the same action. Mirror neurons play a vital role in how people learn through mimicry and feel empathy for others.
When you wince while seeing someone experience pain — a phenomenon called “neural resonance” — mirror neurons are responsible.
Iacoboni wondered if neural resonance might play a role in how people navigate complicated problems that require both conscious deliberation and consideration of another’s feelings.
To find out, researchers showed 19 volunteers two videos: one of a hypodermic needle piercing a hand, and another of a hand being gently touched by a cotton swab. During both, the scientists used a functional MRI machine to measure activity in the volunteers’ brains.
Researchers later asked the participants how they would behave in a variety of moral dilemmas, including the scenario involving the crying baby during wartime, the prospect of torturing another person to prevent a bomb from killing several other people and whether to harm research animals in order to cure AIDS.
Participants also responded to scenarios in which causing harm would make the world worse — inflicting harm on another person in order to avoid two weeks of hard labor, for example — to gauge their willingness to cause harm for moral reasons and for less-noble motives.
Iacoboni and his colleagues hypothesized that people who had greater neural resonance than the other participants while watching the hand-piercing video would also be less likely to choose to silence the baby in the hypothetical dilemma, and that proved to be true. Indeed, people with stronger activity in the inferior frontal cortex, a part of the brain essential for empathy and imitation, were less willing to cause direct harm, such as silencing the baby.
But the researchers found no correlation between people’s brain activity and their willingness to hypothetically harm one person in the interest of the greater good — such as silencing the baby to save more lives. Those decisions are thought to stem from more cognitive, deliberative processes.
The study confirms that genuine concern for others’ pain plays a causal role in moral dilemma judgments, Iacoboni said. In other words, a person’s refusal to silence the baby is due to concern for the baby, not just the person’s own discomfort in taking that action.
Iacoboni’s next project will explore whether a person’s decision-making in moral dilemmas can be influenced by decreasing or enhancing activity in the areas of the brain that were targeted in the current study.
“It would be fascinating to see if we can use brain stimulation to change complex moral decisions through impacting the amount of concern people experience for others’ pain,” Iacoboni said. “It could provide a new method for increasing concern for others’ well-being.”
The research could point to a way to help people with mental disorders such as schizophrenia that make interpersonal communication difficult, Iacoboni said.
Learn more: Mirror neuron activity predicts people’s decision-making in moral dilemmas, UCLA study finds
The Latest on: Nature of morality
[google_news title=”” keyword=”nature of morality” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]- The neural signature of subjective disgust could apply to both sensory and socio-moral experienceson May 17, 2024 at 4:30 am
Disgust is one of the six basic human emotions, along with happiness, sadness, fear, anger, and surprise. Disgust typically arises when a person perceives a sensory stimulus or situation as revolting, ...
- The Moral Necessity of Proteston May 16, 2024 at 3:00 am
The language of morality is often the language of the right wing ... “This speaks volumes to the dismissive nature of the administration when it comes to strong-willed action toward a permanent ...
- The Intersection Between Morality and AIon May 15, 2024 at 2:18 pm
Moving forward, it’s imperative for businesses and policymakers to consider not only the ethics of AI in retail and service sectors, but also the broader social effects. As technology progresses, we ...
- Nick Cascino Releases New Book DOCTOR MISERY'S CITY OF MUSICon May 14, 2024 at 5:00 pm
As they embark on a river journey through a South American rainforest, Cascino poses existential questions about the nature of music-whether it leads ... consciousness, and morality through the lens ...
- Higher Ed’s Fragmented Moralityon May 11, 2024 at 11:49 pm
Seven years ago, after a parade of antisemitic white supremacists marched through the University of Virginia campus, professor Chad Wellmon wrote an essay for the Chronicle of Higher Education that ...
- What Is a Medieval Morality Play?on May 11, 2024 at 11:11 pm
Gaining huge success and popularity in the late medieval and early Renaissance era, morality plays were performed throughout much of Europe, attracting vast crowds of people and imparting important ...
- Dolly Parton Was Moral to the Point of ‘Obsession,’ Said Her Guitariston May 1, 2024 at 10:35 am
Dolly Parton's guitarist knew all about the affair rumors surrounding her. Here's why he thought they were all false.
- ChatGPT shows better moral judgment than a college undergradon May 1, 2024 at 2:50 am
In "Attributions toward artificial agents in a modified Moral Turing Test"—which was recently published in Nature's online, open-access Scientific Reports journal—those researchers found that ...
- Moral rights reserved? Impact of Creative Commons Licenses: part 1on April 24, 2024 at 5:00 pm
The answer lies in the nature of moral rights of authors as it relates to works licensed under terms suggested by the Creative Commons. The Creative Commons and their copyright licenses have been ...
- 'Our Constitution Was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People,' Part Threeon April 19, 2024 at 4:59 pm
But, because of man’s evil nature—some more than others—humans ... it was written “only for a moral and religious people” (who will restrain themselves—true self-government.
via Google News and Bing News