In July, videos of the fatal police shootings of Alton Sterling—a black man in Louisiana—and Philando Castile—a black man in Minnesota—went viral on social media. The immediate aftermath of the Castile shooting was first shared via Facebook Live, which is a type of mobile streaming video technology (MSVT) that allows users to stream live video to followers, similar to Periscope and Meerkat.
The real-time video of Castile’s death reached over 5 million people within a week of its posting.
In a new study, Up, Periscope: Mobile Streaming Video Technologies, Privacy in Public, and the Right to Record, Jeremy Littau, assistant professor of journalism at Lehigh University, and Daxton Stewart, associate dean and associate professor in the Bob Schieffer College of Communication at Texas Christian University, examine the legal rights of people to record and live-stream and any potential right to be free from being recorded and streamed in public places.
The authors find that current laws protecting individual rights are insufficient to protect privacy when it comes to these technologies and that the First Amendment likely protects livestreaming activities of users.
“The Castile shooting is important not only for its content, but also because a Facebook user showed the public a new tool that it might not otherwise have known about or thought to use in a situation like this,” Littau says.
“What happened in Minnesota is one of those incidents that serve as a harbinger for what is to come.”
Because of the ease with which users are able to share live video streams, MSVTs have great potential to catalyze new privacy laws and policies, as legislatures, courts, citizens, and tech companies consider the balance between peoples individual’s right to privacy and the public’s right to free expression.
Littau says that mobile streaming technologies will soon completely change how the public views privacy. He predicts some entities will seek to carve out special exemptions for themselves.
“Our work already mentions situations where municipalities have tried to pass laws stopping citizens from recording police activities in public. It’s completely unconstitutional, but that won’t stop people from trying,” he explains. “Exempting public officials and government workers from the laws that apply to everyone is not a new idea in the U.S. At some point a locality is going to try and make it a crime to live stream police actions on the street.”
Services like Facebook Live break down the previous lag between information collection and information distribution, making potential privacy violations instantaneous and unavoidable, according to the research, which was published in print in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly in June.
The researchers advocate that privacy challenges be addressed directly between by mobile streaming companies and their users via contracts. Attempts to strengthen privacy laws will likely be thwarted by First Amendment protections.
“Ultimately consumers of tools like Periscope and Facebook Live will shape the way they are used,” Dr. Stewart says.
“If the developers do not place restraints on use, and do not provide tools for the community of users to monitor content, then it’s likely we will continue to see them put to troubling uses such the teenager who live-streamed her suicide in France, or the young woman who live-streamed a friend being sexually assaulted earlier this year.”
Stewart says the biggest challenge that the courts will face when these cases arise will be trying to fit old ways of thinking about privacy and public spaces into new tools that weren’t even foreseeable when those approaches to privacy were developed. “In this study, we advocate for less legal restraint of recording and live-streaming public matters or government officials in public places, which clearly deserve First Amendment protection,” he says. “But we also call for wisdom by users and tech companies in controlling the spread of materials that may be more harmful to private individuals.”
Learn more: LIVE-STREAMING CRIME: HOW WILL FACEBOOK LIVE CHALLENGE PRIVACY LAW?
The Latest on: Privacy law
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Privacy law” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Privacy law
- Opinion: Congress is working on a federal privacy law. Here’s why we need oneon May 10, 2024 at 3:00 pm
As consumers, we have the power to force companies to respect our data preferences — if we stay angry, and keep paying attention to how our data is used and abused.
- Maryland Signs Data Privacy Act Into Law—And Bucks Several Privacy Trendson May 10, 2024 at 2:44 pm
The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 will go into effect on Oct. 1, 2025 and will bring new stringent protections for children’s data and biometric data, among other unique requirements.
- Data privacy focus of bills signed by Maryland Gov. Wes Mooreon May 10, 2024 at 9:06 am
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore has signed two measures into law to better protect personal data online from Big Tech. One of the bills signed Thursday will make Maryland the second state to create strong ...
- Digital privacy legislation gets a bipartisan pushon May 10, 2024 at 2:45 am
A proposal for comprehensive digital privacy policy, one of the most contentious matters of the online era, is being floated in Congress by lawmakers in key positions to get it enacted. If passed, the ...
- Maryland Enacts Comprehensive Consumer Privacy Legislation: What You Need to Knowon May 9, 2024 at 4:59 pm
Maryland Governor Wes Moore signed the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 (MODPA) into law on May 9, 2024. This new law establishes transparency, assessment ...
- Unraveling The American Data Privacy Patchwork: Will the American Privacy Rights Act Succeed?on May 9, 2024 at 11:46 am
As the focus on protecting personal data continues to grow with the ever-widening adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, exponential increases in the number and breadth of data breaches, and ...
- A New Dawn for Privacy: Everything You Need to Know About the American Privacy Rights Acton May 6, 2024 at 4:01 am
While the APRA is still a “discussion draft,” it aims to provide a national data privacy and security framework outlining consumer rights and data management requirements. Under the APRA, companies ...
- New privacy laws may hurt small businesses moston May 4, 2024 at 10:00 am
The New York Privacy Act, currently winding its way through the legislature, would affect even smaller businesses than the federal proposal. New York lawmakers say that startups making more than $25 ...
- As White Castle pays up, the Legislature considers tweaking Illinois' biometric privacy lawon May 1, 2024 at 3:46 am
Businesses are watching, as lawmakers consider easing the threat of "annihilative" damages hobbling companies that violate the Biometric Information Privacy Act.
- No, really, Californians should support a federal privacy lawon April 29, 2024 at 4:01 pm
A comprehensive federal privacy and security law can positively impact California’s economy and enhance Californians’ privacy and security.
via Bing News