New untraceable text-messaging system comes with statistical guarantees.
Anonymity networks, which sit on top of the public Internet, are designed to conceal people’s Web-browsing habits from prying eyes. The most popular of these, Tor, has been around for more than a decade and is used by millions of people every day.
Recent research, however, has shown that adversaries can infer a great deal about the sources of supposedly anonymous communications by monitoring data traffic through just a few well-chosen nodes in an anonymity network. At the Association for Computing Machinery Symposium on Operating Systems Principles in October, a team of MIT researchers presented a new, untraceable text-messaging system designed to thwart even the most powerful of adversaries.
The system provides a strong mathematical guarantee of user anonymity, while, according to experimental results, permitting the exchange of text messages once a minute or so.
“Tor operates under the assumption that there’s not a global adversary that’s paying attention to every single link in the world,” says Nickolai Zeldovich, an associate professor of computer science and engineering, whose group developed the new system. “Maybe these days this is not as good of an assumption. Tor also assumes that no single bad guy controls a large number of nodes in their system. We’re also now thinking, maybe there are people who can compromise half of your servers.”
Because the system confuses adversaries by drowning telltale traffic patterns in spurious information, or “noise,” its creators have dubbed it “Vuvuzela,” after the noisemakers favored by soccer fans at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa.
Joining Zeldovich on the paper are joint first authors David Lazar, a PhD student in electrical engineering and computer science, and Jelle van den Hoof, who received his MIT master’s in the spring, and Matei Zaharia, an assistant professor of computer science and engineering and, like Zeldovich, one of the co-leaders of the Parallel and Distributed Operating Systems group at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
Covering your tracks
Vuvuzela is a dead-drop system, in which one user leaves a message for another at a predefined location — in this case, a memory address on an Internet-connected server — and the other user retrieves it. But it adds several layers of obfuscation to cover the users’ trails.
To illustrate how the system works, Lazar describes a simplified scenario in which it has only three users, named, by cryptographic convention, Alice, Bob, and Charlie. Alice and Bob wish to exchange text messages, but they don’t want anyone to be able to infer that they’ve been in touch.
If Alice and Bob send messages to the dead-drop server, and Charlie doesn’t, then an observer would conclude that Alice and Bob are communicating. So the system’s first requirement is that all users send regular messages to the server, whether they contain any information or not.
If an adversary has infiltrated the server, however, he or she can see which users are accessing which memory addresses. If Charlie’s message is routed to one address, but both Alice’s and Bob’s messages are routed to another, the adversary, again, knows who’s been talking.
So instead of using a single server, Vuvuzela uses three. Corresponding to the three servers, every message sent through the system is wrapped in three layers of encryption. The first server peels off the first layer of encryption before passing messages on to the second server. But it also randomly permutes their order. So if, for example, Alice’s message arrived at the first server before Bob’s, and Bob’s arrived before Charlie’s, the first server will pass them to the second in the order Bob, Alice, Charlie, or Charlie, Bob, Alice, or the like.
The second server peels off the second layer of encryption and permutes the message order yet again. Only the third server sees which messages are bound for which memory addresses. But even if it’s been infiltrated, and even if the adversary observed the order in which the messages arrived at the first server, he or she can’t tell whose message ended up where.
The adversary does, however, know that two users whose messages reached the first server within some window of time have been talking. And even that is more information than Vuvuzela’s designers want to give away.
Here’s where the noise comes in: When the first server passes on the messages it’s received, it also manufactures a slew of dummy messages, with their own encrypted destinations. The second server does the same. So statistically, it’s almost impossible for the adversary to determine even whether any of the messages arriving within the same time window ended up at the same destination.
Those statistical guarantees hold even if two of the three servers are infiltrated. As long as one of them remains uncompromised, the system works.
Read more: Untraceable communication — guaranteed
The Latest on: Untraceable communication
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Untraceable communication” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Untraceable communication
- Police: Call threatening Conn. Capitol 'untraceable' from secured, possibly foreign phoneon May 1, 2024 at 3:22 pm
"It's pretty much untraceable," Lt. Gregory Wimble ... "The police have always maintained efficient and clear communications with those they are sworn to protect. "This was a textbook response on ...
- Police: Call threatening violence at CT Capitol 'untraceable,' from secured, possibly foreign phoneon May 1, 2024 at 12:31 pm
Tuesday’s threat of violence at the CT state Capitol came from a secured phone and was similar to threats phoned to at least four other states, police say.
- Zilingo's Ex-CEO Ankiti Bose Case: Lawsuit Filed in HC Against Dhruv Kapoor, Aadi Vaidya for Alleged Defamationon May 1, 2024 at 7:40 am
The Bombay High Court's intervention in this matter underscores the seriousness with which allegations of defamation and misinformation are being addressed, emphasizing the importance of adherence to ...
- The Long Running Mysterious Fraud in the Small Business Finance Industry and How to Defend Yourselfon April 30, 2024 at 8:51 pm
The submitted deals are real. The merchants are real. Everything checks out until suddenly it doesn’t. The merchants block the payments and find out they’ve been scammed.The funders find out they’ve ...
- SPS, SPD and Commonwealth’s Attorney partner to host gang awareness programon April 30, 2024 at 7:26 am
Youth violence was the topic of discussion for Suffolk Public Schools and the school community Wednesday night. In honor of National Youth Violence Prevention Week, SPS families came out to discuss ...
- What are Google chat scams, and how to stay away from themon April 26, 2024 at 3:12 am
Google Chat is a messaging application that allows businesses and individuals to collaborate and stay connected.
- Ill-Conceived Games Ready to Stir the Pot with Summer Releaseson April 24, 2024 at 1:00 am
Following the untraceable success of their 2023 releases, Ill-Conceived Games announced a new group of titles for the upcoming Board Game Con season. President, CEO, and ChatGPT journeyman David ...
- DOJ clears FBI of targeting 'radical-traditionalist Catholics' in controversial memoon April 23, 2024 at 1:26 pm
The U S Department of Justice s Inspector General maintains that the FBI did not commit any wrongdoing or demonstrate hostility toward religion by circulating an internal document warning about ...
- Tulare Police Department investigating scam targeting students on social mediaon April 17, 2024 at 6:44 pm
The agency has received reports of children being contacted through Instagram accounts that appear to be from other students at their schools.
- Custer County Sheriff’s Office warns of land sale scamson April 16, 2024 at 12:49 pm
According to the Custer County Sheriff’s Office, there has been a surge of fraudulent land sales in Custer County, leading to multiple open criminal cases. On Tuesday, April 16, the Sheriff’s Office ...
via Bing News