The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Crowd wisdom such as what might arise from online voting is popularly assumed to provide better answers than any one person by aggregating multiple perspectives. Democratic methods, however, tend to favor the most popular information, not necessarily the most correct. The ignorance of the masses can cancel out a knowledgeable minority with specialized information of a topic, resulting in the wrong answer becoming the most accepted.
To give more weight to correct information that may not be widely known, researchers from Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed what they call the “surprisingly popular” algorithm. Reported in the journal Nature Jan. 25, the technique hinges on asking people two things about a given question: What do they think the right answer is, and how popular do they think each answer will be?
The correct answer is that which is more popular than people predict, the researchers report. The technique could refine wisdom-of-crowds surveys, which are used in political and economic forecasting, as well as many other collective activities, from pricing artwork to grading scientific research proposals.
The researchers tested their algorithm through multiple surveys conducted on various populations. In one test, they asked people a yes-or-no question, Is Philadelphia the capital of Pennsylvania? Respondents also were asked to predict the prevalence of “yes” votes. Because Philadelphia is a “large, historically significant city,” most people in the group thought that, yes, it is the capital of Pennsylvania — Harrisburg is in fact the state’s capital. In addition, the people who mistakenly thought Philadelphia is the state capital also predicted that a very high percentage of people would answer “yes.”
Meanwhile, a certain number of respondents knew that the correct answer is “no.” But these people also anticipated that many other people would incorrectly think the capital is Philadelphia, so they also expected a very high percentage of “yes” answers. Thus, almost everyone expected other people to answer “yes,” but the actual percentage of people who did was significantly lower. “No” was the surprisingly popular answer because it exceeded expectations of what the answer would be.
Sebastian Seung, Princeton’s Evnin Professor in Neuroscience and professor of computer science and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, said that the surprisingly popular, or SP, method is still democratic because there is no expectation of who would have specialized information, only that the information exists. Seung added that the researchers’ work was published 110 years after Nature published the seminal paper in crowd wisdom, Sir Francis Galton’s 1907 study “The Wisdom of Crowds.”
“The SP method is elitist in the sense that it tries to identify those who have expert knowledge,” Seung said. “However, it is democratic in the sense that potentially anyone could be identified as an expert. The method does not look at anyone’s resume or academic degrees.”
The researchers developed their method mathematically then applied it through surveys on multiple groups of people, including U.S. state capitals, general knowledge, medical diagnoses and art auction estimates.
Across all topics, the researchers found that the “surprisingly popular” algorithm reduced errors by 21.3 percent compared to simple majority votes, and by 24.2 percent compared to basic confidence-weighted votes (where people express how confident they are in their answers). It also reduced errors by 22.2 percent compared to answers with the highest average confidence levels. On the 50 test questions related to state capitals — such as the Harrisburg-Philadelphia question — the SP method reduced incorrect decisions by 48 percent compared to the majority vote.
“The argument in this paper, in a very rough sense, is that people who expect to be in the minority deserve some extra attention,” said co-author Drazen Prelec, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management as well as of economics and brain and cognitive sciences. “In situations where there is enough information in the crowd to determine the correct answer to a question, that answer will be the one [that] most outperforms expectations.”
Aurelien Baillon, a professor of economics at Erasmus University in Rotterdam who is familiar with the new paper but had no role in it, said that the researchers’ work “opens up completely new ways to think about an old problem.” The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Learn more:Â In crowd wisdom, the ‘surprisingly popular’ answer can trump ignorance of the masses
[osd_subscribe categories=’crowd-wisdom’ placeholder=’Email Address’ button_text=’Subscribe Now for any new posts on the topic “CROWD WISDOM”‘]
Receive an email update when we add a new CROWD WISDOMÂ article.
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
[google_news title=”” keyword=”crowd wisdom” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
- 10 Hidden Gems To Discover In Srinagaron March 28, 2024 at 9:49 pm
Path Delights Encircled by the majestic Himalayas lies Srinagar, crown jewel of Kashmir, renowned globally for exquisite Mughal gardens and serene lakes hemmed by houseboats. Yet concealed off ...
- World champion Rangers overcome disputed tip and beat Cubs 4-3 on Heim’s 10th-inning singleon March 28, 2024 at 8:37 pm
ARLINGTON, Texas — Jonah Heim hit a game-ending RBI single with two outs in the 10th inning as the World Series champion Texas Rangers opened the season with a 4-3 win over the Chicago Cubs on ...
- Could artificial intelligence benefit democracy?on March 28, 2024 at 6:30 pm
Concern about artificial intelligence (AI) wrecking elections and threatening democracy has reached fever pitch. Each week sees a new set of warnings about the potential impact of AI-generated ...
- Denver Nuggets News: Michael Porter Jr. Reacts to Brother's Gambling Scandalon March 28, 2024 at 5:07 pm
Morgan Engel/Getty Images "Yeah, especially the last few years you hear people in the crowd saying what they need you to score ... Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding ...
- The IRA’s New Conventional Wisdomon March 28, 2024 at 12:06 pm
Even though the law passed Congress with no Republican votes, it would likely survive future GOP control of Washington.
- Stoicism is more popular than ever. Too bad it’s so incoherent now.on March 28, 2024 at 11:05 am
Now, we’re flooded with Stoic books; it’s arguably America’s leading nonreligious doctrine. Ryan Holiday, a former marketer and journalist, has built a cottage industry around Stoicism that includes ...
- No One Ends a Comedy Show Like Tig Notaroon March 28, 2024 at 11:01 am
In her specials and albums, the stand-up constantly pushes the boundaries of what audiences might expect from a closing joke.
- On Lent, more ears and less mouthon March 28, 2024 at 2:00 am
You invited them in?” I’d chuckled to my mother-in-law. Visiting from Brooklyn, I’d found her, teapot in hand, deep in conversation with proselytizing strangers who’d rung her Cincinnati ...
- AI forecaster can predict the future better than humanson March 26, 2024 at 8:01 am
An AI forecaster based on the language model GPT-4 can predict the outcome of future events more accurately than single humans. In some cases, it can even outperform the “wisdom of crowds” ...
via Bing News