University of Washington researchers have created a reactor that can completely break down hard-to-destroy chemicals. Shown here are two reactors before they are assembled.Igor Novosselov/University of Washington
“Forever chemicals,” named for their ability to persist in water and soil, are a class of molecules that are ever-present in our daily lives, including food packaging and household cleaning products. Because these chemicals don’t break down, they end up in our water and food, and they can lead to health effects, such as cancer or decreased fertility.
Last month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed to give two of the most common forever chemicals, known as PFOA and PFOS, a “superfund” designation, which would make it easier for the EPA to track them and plan cleanup measures.
Cleanups would obviously be more effective if the forever chemicals could be destroyed in the process, and many researchers have been studying how to break them down. Now a team of researchers at the University of Washington has a new way to destroy both PFOA and PFOS. The researchers created a reactor that can completely break down hard-to-destroy chemicals using “supercritical water,” which is formed at high temperature and pressure. This technology could help treat industrial waste, destroy concentrated forever chemicals that already exist in the environment and deal with old stocks, such as the forever chemicals in fire-fighting foam.
The team published these findings on Sept. 7 in Chemical Engineering Journal.
UW News spoke with senior author Igor Novosselov, a UW research associate professor of mechanical engineering, to learn about the details.
What is supercritical water and how can it destroy these molecules?
Igor Novosselov: Our reactor basically heats water very fast, but it heats water differently than when you boil it for pasta. Typically, when you raise the temperature, water boils and turns to steam. From there, the water and steam do not get hotter than 100 degrees Celsius (212 F).
But if you compress water, you can shift that equilibrium and get that boiling point at much hotter temperatures. If you increase the pressure, the boiling temperature increases. At one point, the water will not transition from liquid to vapor. Instead, you’ll hit a critical point where water will reach a different state of matter, called the supercritical phase. Here water is not a liquid or a gas. It’s something between, and the lines are kind of fuzzy there. It’s something like a plasma where the water molecules become like ionized particles. These partially dissociated molecules bounce around at high temperatures and high speeds. It is a very corrosive and chemically aggressive environment in which organic molecules cannot survive.
Chemicals that survive forever in normal water, such as PFOS and PFOA, can be broken down in supercritical water at a very high rate. If we get the conditions right, these recalcitrant molecules can be completely destroyed, leaving no intermediate products and yielding only harmless substances, such as carbon dioxide, water and fluoride salts, which are often added to municipal water and toothpaste.
How did you get started designing this reactor?
IN: We originally designed it to break down chemical warfare agents, which are also really hard to destroy. It took us five years to make the reactor. There were significant questions such as, how do we keep things at that pressure? Inside the reactor, the pressure is 200 times higher than at sea level. Another question we had was: How do we ensure that the reactor ignites and operates at a designated temperature in continuous mode? It became an engineering project, but after all, we’re engineers.
How does the reactor work?
IN: The whole thing is inside a thick stainless steel pipe about a foot long and an inch in diameter. We can vary the temperature inside to figure out how hot we need to go to completely destroy a chemical. Some chemicals require 400 C (752 F), some 650 C (1202 F).
At the top of the reactor, we continuously inject pilot fuel, air and the chemical we want to destroy, for example: PFOS, into the supercritical water. The fuel provides the necessary heat for the mixture to remain supercritical, and the PFOS rapidly mixes with this aggressive media. Overall, the reaction time is less than a minute. At the bottom of the reactor, the mixture is cooled down to yield both liquid and gas discharge. We can analyze what’s in both the liquid and the gas phases to measure whether we’ve destroyed the chemical.
What did you find?
IN: We did the same experiment with PFOS and PFOA, because both are regulated by the EPA. We saw that PFOA goes away at mild supercritical conditions (around 400 degrees C, or 750 F), but PFOS doesn’t. It took until we reached 610 degrees C (1130 F) to see the destruction of PFOS. At that temperature, PFOS and all intermediates were destroyed — in a matter of 30 seconds.
At lower temperatures, PFOS experiments showed the formation of a variety of intermediate molecules, including PFOA. Some of these breakdown products came out in the liquid phase, which means they could be present in wastewater at manufacturing sites that use forever chemicals. But other intermediates are coming out in the gas phase, which is problematic because gas emissions are not typically regulated. These molecules contain fluorine, and we know these types of gases contribute to greenhouse effects. Right now, we don’t have a way to monitor the gas pollution in real-time, and we do not know how much we would produce or even their exact chemical composition.
What’s next for this project?
IN: We have a few next steps. We’ve been using the reactor to see how well it destroys other forever chemicals besides PFOS and PFOA. We’re also assessing how well this technology could work for real-world scenarios. You probably cannot treat the whole ocean like this, for example. But we could possibly use this to treat existing problems, such as forever chemical waste at manufacturing sites.
Forever chemical contamination is a big problem, and it will not go away. We are excited to work on it and collaborate with regulators and leading groups in academia and industry to find the solution.
Original Article: Q&A: UW researchers develop a reactor that can destroy ‘forever chemicals’
More from: University of Washington
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- 'Forever Chemicals' May Reduce Fertility in Women by Up to 40%, Study Finds
Though the nature of this connection isn't clear, the results add to growing concerns that concentrations of so-called 'forever chemicals' across Earth's surface are silently putting our health at ...
- What’s it take to get ‘forever chemicals’ out of drinking water? Big new systems that you might have to help pay for.
The tanks owned by Aqua Pennsylvania contain granulated activated carbon (GAC) to filter “forever chemicals” out of drinking water for 6,000 local residents. The water comes from a 405-feet deep well ...
- Minnesota budget includes $45 million to reduce 'forever chemicals'
Officials from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Health say more than $45 million in Governor Tim Walz's budget would go toward reducing the chemicals in the state.
- The Semiconductor Industry Wants To Water Down "Forever Chemicals" Regulation
Can you believe that in the 18th century, aristocrats used lead-based makeup? Honestly, what kind of society would expose itself to a ...
- Minnesota officials plug fight against ‘forever chemicals’
Minnesota pollution and health officials made the case at the State Capitol on Thursday for legislation to restrict nonessential uses of “forever chemicals” known as PFAS, and for the $45.6 million ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
[google_news title=”” keyword=”forever chemicals” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
Go deeper with Bing News on:
PFOA and PFOS
- EPA proposes first-ever limits on PFAS in drinking water
The proposed limits would cap two common types of PFAS contamination — the chemicals PFOA and PFOS — in drinking water at just 4 parts per trillion. That’s a significant reduction from the ...
- DEC releases ambient water quality guidance values for PFOA, PFOS, and 1,4-Dioxane
“Finalization of the water quality guidance values keeps New York State as a national leader in regulating PFOA, PFOS, and 1,4-Dioxane in surface water and groundwater, reinforces the levels ...
- Child growth and development hampered by PFAS in blood, study says
Human-made chemicals called PFAS alter pathways needed for human growth and development, according to a recent study analyzing blood samples from young children, teens and young adults.
- An expert explains technology and investment needed to get forever chemicals out of drinking water
Two of the six chemicals — PFOA and PFOS — are no longer produced in large quantities, but they remain common in the environment because they were so widely used and break down extremely slowly.
- EPA's new drinking water regulations would limit 'forever chemicals' to lowest detected levels
WASHINGTON – The Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday proposed limiting the amount of harmful “forever chemicals” in drinking water to the lowest level that tests can detect, a ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
PFOA and PFOS
[google_news title=”” keyword=”PFOA and PFOS” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]