A tabular iceberg floating within Paradise Harbour, Antarctica
The poles are warming several times faster than the global average, causing record smashing heatwaves that were reported earlier this year in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Melting ice and collapsing glaciers at high latitudes would accelerate sea level rise around the planet. Fortunately, refreezing the poles by reducing incoming sunlight would be both feasible and remarkably cheap, according to new research published today in IOP Publishing’s Environmental Research Communications.
Scientists laid out a possible future program whereby high-flying jets would spray microscopic aerosol particles into the atmosphere at latitudes of 60 degrees north and south – roughly Anchorage and the southern tip of Patagonia. If injected at a height of 43,000 feet (above airliner cruising altitudes), these aerosols would slowly drift poleward, slightly shading the surface beneath. “There is widespread and sensible trepidation about deploying aerosols to cool the planet,” notes lead author Wake Smith, “but if the risk/benefit equation were to pay off anywhere, it would be at the poles”.
Particle injections would be performed seasonally in the long days of the local spring and early summer. The same fleet of jets could service both hemispheres, ferrying to the opposite pole with the change of seasons.
Pre-existing military air-to-air refuelling tankers such as the aged KC-135 and the A330 MMRT don’t have enough payload at the required altitudes, whereas newly designed high-altitude tankers would prove much more efficient. A fleet of roughly 125 such tankers could loft a payload sufficient to cool the regions poleward of 60°N/S by 2°C per year, which would return them close to their pre-industrial average temperatures. Costs are estimated at $11 billion annually – less than one-third the cost of cooling the entire planet by the same 2°C magnitude and a tiny fraction of the cost of reaching net zero emissions.
“Game changing though this could be in a rapidly warming world, stratospheric aerosol injections merely treat a symptom of climate change but not the underlying disease. It’s aspirin, not penicillin. It’s not a substitute for decarbonization,” says Smith.
Cooling at the poles would provide direct protection for only a small fraction of the planet, though the mid-latitudes should also experience some temperature reduction. Since less than 1% of the global human population lives in the target deployment zones, a polar deployment would entail much less direct risk to most of humanity than a global program. “Nonetheless, any intentional turning of the global thermostat would be of common interest to all of humanity and not merely the province of Arctic and Patagonian nations,” adds Smith.
In summary, the current study is just one small and preliminary step towards understanding the costs, benefits, and risks of undertaking climate intervention at high latitudes. It provides further reason to believe that such tools could prove useful both in preserving cryosphere near the poles and slowing sea level rise globally.
Original Article: Refreezing poles feasible and cheap, new study finds
More from: Yale University
The Latest Updates from Bing News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Climate crisis: Net zero goal still alive, says IEA
Globally, the rate at which people are installing solar panels and buying electric vehicles is "perfectly in line" with what experts have said is necessary to reach net zero emissions by 2050. That's ...
- Sunak is laying out a climate trap for Labour to falling at an election
As the world looks on at Rishi Sunak’s climate decisions with bemusement, his target is an electoral victory banking on the “ULEZ effect”, writes Barry Johnston Last week in New York, on the margins ...
- US Intervention and Sanctions Blamed for Rise in US-Mexico Border Crossings
Expanding policing of migrants only causes more hardships, said Fernando García of the Border Network for Human Rights.
- Taking action on climate change is remedy for anxiety, despair | Commentary
We don’t need to sacrifice our lifestyle, just make changes. Alternative energy is just that, an alternative that will reduce the carbon presently dumped into our atmosphere. And that’s just ...
- Renowned climate scientist Michael E. Mann on what ‘doomers’ get wrong
In his new book, ‘Our Fragile Moment,’ he explains why every fraction of a degree of climate warming is worth preventing.
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Geoengineering News
Apr. 20, 2022 — Geoengineering the climate would have massive repercussions for the health of billions of people at risk of malaria who live in tropical countries, according to a new finding.
- Some Politicians Want to Research Geoengineering as a Climate Solution. Scientists Are Worried
Supporters of researching solar geoengineering techniques like SAI say it could serve as a critical tool to save lives from some of the worst effects of climate change; opponents say that even ...
- Hurricane Lee formed naturally, and no current technology can create hurricanes | Fact check
Geoengineering technology isn't advanced enough to create or manipulate hurricanes. Hurricane Lee was formed by a set of atmospheric conditions.
- It’s Too Late for Geoengineering Alone to Save Antarctica, Scientists Find
Unfortunately, a team of scientists from Switzerland and the United Kingdom have come out with a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change that shows solar geoengineering alone would have a ...
- Solar geoengineering on policy table, experts warn of more harm
The technologies that are talked about are space-based reflectors, stratospheric aerosol injection, cirrus cloud thinning and marine cloud brightening.