“In most cases, companies do not offer any explanation about how they gain access to users’ profiles, from where they collect the data, and with whom they trade their data. It’s not just fairness that’s at stake; it’s also trust.”
Tae Wan Kim
Associate Professor of Business Ethics
Increasingly, businesses rely on algorithms that use data provided by users to make decisions that affect people. For example, Amazon, Google, and Facebook use algorithms to tailor what users see, and Uber and Lyft use them to match passengers with drivers and set prices. Do users, customers, employees, and others have a right to know how companies that use algorithms make their decisions?
In a new analysis, researchers explore the moral and ethical foundations to such a right. They conclude that the right to such an explanation is a moral right, then address how companies might do so.
The analysis, by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, appears in Business Ethics Quarterly, a publication of the Society for Business Ethics.
“In most cases, companies do not offer any explanation about how they gain access to users’ profiles, from where they collect the data, and with whom they trade their data,” explains Tae Wan Kim, Associate Professor of Business Ethics at Carnegie Mellon University’s Tepper School of Business, who co-wrote the analysis. “It’s not just fairness that’s at stake; it’s also trust.”
In response to the rise of autonomous decision-making algorithms and their reliance on data provided by users, a growing number of computer scientists and governmental bodies have called for transparency under the broad concept of algorithmic accountability. For example, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2016, part of which regulates the use of automatic algorithmic decision systems. The GDPR, which launched in 2018, affects businesses that process the personally identifiable information of residents of the European Union.
But the GDPR is ambiguous about whether it involves a right to explanation regarding how businesses’ automated algorithmic profiling systems reach decisions. In this analysis, the authors develop a moral argument that can serve as a foundation for a legally recognized version of this right.
In the digital era, the authors write, some say that informed consent—obtaining prior permission for disclosing information with full knowledge of the possible consequences—is no longer possible because many digital transactions are ongoing. Instead, the authors conceptualize informed consent as an assurance of trust for incomplete algorithmic processes.
Obtaining informed consent, especially when companies collect and process personal data, is ethically required unless overridden for specific, acceptable reasons, the authors argue. Moreover, informed consent in the context of algorithmic decision-making, especially for non-contextual and unpredictable uses, is incomplete without an assurance of trust.
In this context, the authors conclude, companies have a moral duty to provide an explanation not just before automated decision making occurs, but also afterward, so the explanation can address both system functionality and the rationale of a specific decision.
The authors also delve into how companies that run businesses based on algorithms can provide explanations of their use in a way that attracts clients while maintaining trade secrets. This is an important decision for many modern start-ups, including such questions as to how much code should be open source, and how extensive and exposed the application program interface should be.
Many companies are already tackling these challenges, the authors note. Some may choose to hire “data interpreters,” employees who bridge the work of data scientists and the people affected by the companies’ decisions.
“Will requiring an algorithm to be interpretable or explainable hinder businesses’ performance or lead to better results?” asks Bryan R. Routledge, Associate Professor of Finance at Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business, who co-wrote the analysis. “That is something we’ll see play out in the near future, much like the transparency conflict of Apple and Facebook. But more importantly, the right to explanation is an ethical obligation apart from bottom-line impact.”
More from: Carnegie Mellon University
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- VIYI Algorithms and Venus Merged SPAC Listing, Explaining Several Highlights in Detailon August 24, 2021 at 5:21 am
Recently, TickerWin, the leading market research firm, has released a research report "VIYI Algorithms and Venus Merged SPAC Listing, Explaining Several Highlights in Detail". On June 10, 2021, VIYI ...
- What is 'MUM,' Google's future algorithm for revolutionising our web searches?on August 23, 2021 at 9:54 pm
Google hasn't stopped tinkering with its search engine, looking to innovations and in particular an algorithm to transform searches for answers to complex questions. This new technology, which is at ...
- Mathematicians build an algorithm to 'do the twist'on August 23, 2021 at 12:58 pm
Mathematicians at the Center for Advanced Mathematics for Energy Research Applications (CAMERA) at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have developed a mathematical algorithm to ...
- Explained: Facebook’s tussle with researchers studying its algorithms and political ad dataon August 20, 2021 at 8:19 pm
In the month of August alone, researchers from NYU, AlgorithmWatch, and Princeton, were forced to suspend their work by Facebook.
- From Genes to Memes: New Algorithm To Help Scientists Demystify Complex Networkson August 20, 2021 at 1:21 am
Algorithm helps study of how relatively simple actions can lead to complex behaviors, from cancer growth to voting patterns. From biochemical reactions that produce cancers, to the latest memes ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Global Data Analytics in Banking Market to grow at a Significant Rate through 2026 – TechSci Researchon August 24, 2021 at 4:08 am
Growing demand of hyper personalized experience and the emergence of banking 4 0 concept is expected to drive the demand for global data analytics in banking market in forecast period According to ...
- Afghanistan: Incredible space map tracking Taliban troops helps save Afghan interpreterson August 24, 2021 at 3:29 am
AFGHAN interpreters who face the threat of death from the Taliban are being rescued from the war-torn country with the aid of satellite imagery, as world leaders come together to address the ...
- Global data analytics in banking market to grow up to 2026on August 24, 2021 at 2:50 am
The global data analytics in banking market is expected to witness steady growth up to 2026, according to TechSci Research report. Growing demand of hyper personalised experience and the emergence of ...
- Data breaches drop as cybercrime riseson August 23, 2021 at 7:54 pm
Australian businesses may have reported fewer data breaches during the first half of 2021 than in any comparable period for years, but cybersecurity experts warn companies not to interpret the figures ...
- Data Reveal The Truth About COVID Countermeasureson August 23, 2021 at 6:30 pm
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola In this interview, Ivor Cummins shares his insights about the ineffectiveness of COVID countermeasures, and how to stay healthy ...