via Cornell University
When you search for something on the internet, do you scroll through page after page of suggestions – or pick from the first few choices?
Because most people choose from the tops of these lists, they rarely see the vast majority of the options, creating a potential for bias in everything from hiring to media exposure to e-commerce.
In a new paper, Cornell researchers introduce a tool they’ve developed to improve the fairness of online rankings without sacrificing their usefulness or relevance.
“If you could examine all your choices equally and then decide what to pick, that may be considered ideal. But since we can’t do that, rankings become a crucial interface to navigate these choices,” said computer science doctoral student Ashudeep Singh, co-first author of “Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rank,” which won the Best Paper Award at the Association for Computing Machinery SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, held virtually July 25-30.
“For example, many YouTubers will post videos of the same recipe, but some of them get seen way more than others, even though they might be very similar,” Singh said. “And this happens because of the way search results are presented to us. We generally go down the ranking linearly and our attention drops off fast.”
The researchers’ method, called FairCo, gives roughly equal exposure to equally relevant choices and avoids preferential treatment for items that are already high on the list. This can correct the unfairness inherent in existing algorithms, which can exacerbate inequality and political polarization, and curtail personal choice.
“What ranking systems do is they allocate exposure. So how do we make sure that everybody receives their fair share of exposure?” said Thorsten Joachims, professor of computer science and information science, and the paper’s senior author. “What constitutes fairness is probably very different in, say, an e-commerce system and a system that ranks resumes for a job opening. We came up with computational tools that let you specify fairness criteria, as well as the algorithm that will provably enforce them.”
Online ranking systems were originally based on library science from the 1960s and ’70s, which sought to make it easier for users to find the books they wanted. But this approach can be unfair in two-sided markets, in which one entity wants to find something and another wants to be found.
“Much of machine learning work in optimizing rankings is still very much focused on maximizing utility to the users,” Joachims said. “What we’ve done over the last few years is come up with notions of how to maximize utility while still being fair to the items that are being searched.”
Algorithms that prioritize more popular items can be unfair because the higher a choice appears in the list, the more likely users are to click on and react to it. This creates a “rich get richer” phenomenon where one choice becomes increasingly popular, and other choices go unseen.
Algorithms also seek the most relevant items to searchers, but because the vast majority of people choose one of the first few items in a list, small differences in relevance can lead to huge discrepancies in exposure. For example, if 51% of the readers of a news publication prefer opinion pieces that skew conservative, and 49% prefer essays that are more liberal, all of the top stories highlighted on the home page could conceivably lean conservative, according to the paper.
“When small differences in relevance lead to one side being amplified, that often causes polarization, where some people tend to dominate the conversation and other opinions get dropped without their fair share of attention,” Joachims said. “You might want to use it in an e-commerce system to make sure that if you’re producing a product that 30% of people like, you’re getting a certain amount of exposure based on that. Or if you have a resume database, you could formulate safeguards to make sure it’s not discriminating by race or gender.”
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Online ranking systems
- Kennesaw State Executive MBA ranked best in Georgia, No. 8 globallyon May 14, 2021 at 9:44 am
Kennesaw State University’s Executive Master of Business Administration program is rated as the best in Georgia for the fifth straight year in CEO Magazine’s 2021 Global Executive MBA Rankings, releas ...
- Online Learning Consortium selects Panopto to expand video trainingon May 13, 2021 at 3:21 pm
The Online Learning Consortium partnered with the software firm Panopto to improve its use of video in offering educators professional development training.
- Does running Google ads help improve SEO rankings?on May 13, 2021 at 8:00 am
The topic of Google Ads and whether or not they can improve SEO rankings is one of the most widely discussed topics in the world of online marketing.
- Top 10 GIS Certificate Programs ranked by industry needson May 10, 2021 at 6:09 pm
You want a GIS certificate to get a job. The motivation is simple. There are a over a hundred colleges in the US that offer GIS certificate programs.
- Splatoon 2’s ranking system explainedon May 8, 2021 at 1:32 pm
You’ve gained a bunch of EXP online, you feel like your the toughest squid kid around, and you want to prove yourself in Splatoon 2. You’ve got some of the best gear sporting the best abilities with ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Online ranking systems
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Fairer search results
- A Look At The Fair Value Of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (NYSE:VPG)on May 14, 2021 at 2:38 am
In this article we are going to estimate the intrinsic value of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (NYSE:VPG) by taking the expected future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. This will ...
- Parking Lot Striping Costs in Fair Oaks, CA in 2021on May 13, 2021 at 11:01 pm
Looking for top Parking Lot Striping professionals in your area? Get a free estimate on any project from our pre-screened contractors today!
- Sohu.com Reports First Quarter 2021 Unaudited Financial Resultson May 13, 2021 at 10:14 pm
China's leading online media, video, gaming and search business group, today reported unaudited financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2021. In view of the previously-announced Share ...
- Apple and Google totally control what you do on your smartphones. We need fair rules.on May 13, 2021 at 12:15 am
Their stranglehold on the app market and smartphones means customers are losing money and choices. We must make sure third-party apps can compete.
- Poshmark, Inc.'s (POSH) CEO Manish Chandra on Q1 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcripton May 12, 2021 at 8:39 pm
Q1 2021 Earnings Conference Call May 12, 2021, 4:45 PM ET Company Participants Christine Chen - Head, Investor Relations Manish Chandra - Founder, Chairman ...