The first system-level picture of nearly 100 million individuals expressing vaccine views among Facebook’s 3 billion users across 37 countries, continents and languages.
Researchers warn scientists are fighting health misinformation in the wrong place
Communities on Facebook that distrust establishment health guidance are more effective than government health agencies and other reliable health groups at reaching and engaging “undecided” individuals, according to a first-of-its-kind study published today by researchers at George Washington University and other institutions in the journal Nature.
The researchers tracked the vaccine conversation among 100 million Facebook users during the height of the 2019 measles outbreak. The new study and its “battleground” map reveal how distrust in establishment health guidance could spread and dominate online conversations over the next decade, potentially jeopardizing public health efforts to protect populations from COVID-19 and future pandemics through vaccinations.
Professor Neil Johnson and his GW research team, including professor Yonatan Lupu and researchers Nicolas Velasquez, Rhys Leahy and Nico Restrepo, collaborated with researchers at the University of Miami, Michigan State University and Los Alamos National Laboratory to better understand how distrust in scientific expertise evolves online, especially related to vaccines.
“There is a new world war online surrounding trust in health expertise and science, particularly with misinformation about COVID-19, but also distrust in big pharmaceuticals and governments,” Dr. Johnson said. “Nobody knew what the field of battle looked like, though, so we set to find out.”
During the 2019 measles outbreak, the research team examined Facebook communities, totaling nearly 100 million users, which were active around the vaccine topic and which formed a highly dynamic, interconnected network across cities, countries, continents and languages. The team identified three camps comprising pro-vaccination communities, anti-vaccination communities and communities of undecided individuals such as parenting groups. Starting with one community, the researchers looked to find a second one that was strongly entangled with the original, and so on, to better understand how they interacted with each other.
They discovered that, while there are fewer individuals with anti-vaccination sentiments on Facebook than with pro-vaccination sentiments, there are nearly three times the number of anti-vaccination communities on Facebook than pro-vaccination communities. This allows anti-vaccination communities to become highly entangled with undecided communities, while pro-vaccination communities remain mostly peripheral. In addition, pro-vaccination communities that focused on countering larger anti-vaccination communities may be missing medium-sized ones growing under the radar.
The researchers also found anti-vaccination communities offer more diverse narratives around vaccines and other established health treatments — promoting safety concerns, conspiracy theories or individual choice, for example — that can appeal to more of Facebook’s approximately 3 billion users, thus increasing the chances of influencing individuals in undecided communities. Pro-vaccination communities, on the other hand, mostly offered monothematic messaging typically focused on the established public health benefits of vaccinations. The GW researchers noted that individuals in these undecided communities, far from being passive bystanders, were actively engaging with vaccine content.
“We thought we would see major public health entities and state-run health departments at the center of this online battle, but we found the opposite. They were fighting off to one side, in the wrong place,” Dr. Johnson said.
As scientists around the world scramble to develop an effective COVID-19 vaccine, the spread of health disinformation and misinformation has important public health implications, especially on social media, which often serves as an amplifier and information equalizer.
In their study, the GW researchers proposed several different strategies to fight against online disinformation, including influencing the heterogeneity of individual communities to delay onset and decrease their growth and manipulating the links between communities in order to prevent the spread of negative views.
“Instead of playing whack-a-mole with a global network of communities that consume and produce (mis)information, public health agencies, social media platforms and governments can use a map like ours and an entirely new set of strategies to identify where the largest theaters of online activity are and engage and neutralize those communities peddling in misinformation so harmful to the public,” Dr. Johnson said.
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Letter: A better world without misinformation
one recent writer seemed upset about what he mistakenly assumed was a long string of “liberal” misinformation. Politics are a dark art, where truth hides in the shadow of opportunism. I’ll only ...
- WHO Chief Warns Against Misinformation Over Global Pandemic Accord
The head of the UN World Health Organization on Thursday spoke out forcefully against "misinformation on social media and in the mainstream media" which has falsely alleged that a new global pandemic ...
- Public health advocates demand Simon & Schuster stop distribution of AIDS denialism book
"As a major publishing house, Simon & Schuster has a duty to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS misinformation and denialism." ...
- Oklahoma mental health providers fight against proposed rule to share patient data
Oklahoma mental health providers are fighting back against a proposed rule that would share patients’ data statewide. Some mental health care providers are against the information exchange. Lawmakers ...
- Lawmaker says concerns about Oklahoma health information exchange 'unfounded'
The Health Care Authority board is poised to adopt agency rules that would require all licensed health care providers, including mental health professionals, to join the exchange by July 1.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
[google_news title=”” keyword=”health misinformation” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Masters of disinformation: How Republicans and Putin warp our perception of reality
Americans no longer share a common reality — but can we all agree that Donald Trump's just in it for the grift?
- UK accuses Russia of disinformation over depleted uranium
Russia is "deliberately trying to disinform," said the UK Ministry of Defense on Tuesday, after Russian President Vladimir Putin warned London against providing Ukraine with ammunition that contains ...
- Censorship? Disinformation? Defining some key terms in the social media debate
While it may not always dominate the headlines, the debate over free speech in the U.S. remains at the forefront of our political conversation.
- Russia intentionally spreads disinformation over depleted uranium rounds – UK Defence Ministry
The UK Defence Ministry states that Russian President Vladimir Putin is "deliberately trying to disinform" the society by publicly criticising the decision to send depleted uranium rounds to Ukraine.
- Health Officials Delayed Report Linking Fluoride to Brain Harm
Records show dental groups urged Department of Health and Human Services to alter report they believed threatened water fluoridation.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
[google_news title=”” keyword=”health disinformation” num_posts=”5″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]