
A small group of anti-vaccine ad buyers has successfully leveraged Facebook to reach targeted audiences, new research shows.
CREDIT
Kirian Villalta, UMD School of Public Health
Study of vaccine-related Facebook ads reveals ongoing challenges to public health
In a year that has seen the largest measles outbreak in the US in more than two decades, the role of social media in giving a platform to unscientific anti-vaccine messages and organizations has become a flashpoint.
In the first study of public health-related Facebook advertising, newly published in the journal Vaccine, researchers at the University of Maryland, the George Washington University and Johns Hopkins University show that a small group of anti-vaccine ad buyers has successfully leveraged Facebook to reach targeted audiences and that the social media platform’s efforts to improve transparency have actually led to the removal of ads promoting vaccination and communicating scientific findings.
The research calls attention to the threat of social media misinformation as it may contribute to increasing “vaccine hesitancy,” which the World Health Organization ranks among the top threats to global health this year. This increasing reluctance or refusal to vaccinate threatens to reverse the progress made in halting vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, which has seen a 30% increase in cases globally.
The research team, co-led by UMD’s Dr. Sandra C. Quinn, GW’s Dr. David Broniatowski and JHU’s Dr. Mark Dredze, examined more than 500 vaccine-related ads served to Facebook users and archived in Facebook’s Ad Library. This archive, which became available in late 2018, catalogued ad content related to “issues of national importance.” Their findings reveal that the majority of advertisements (54%) which opposed vaccination, were posted by only two groups funded by private individuals, the World Mercury Project and Stop Mandatory Vaccination, and emphasized the purported harms of vaccination.
“The average person might think that this anti-vaccine movement is a grassroots effort led by parents, but what we see on Facebook is that there are a handful of well-connected, powerful people who are responsible for the majority of advertisements. These buyers are more organized than people think,” said Amelia Jamison, a faculty research assistant in the Maryland Center for Health Equity, and the study’s first author.
In contrast, those ads promoting vaccination did not reflect a common or organized theme or funder, and were focused on trying to get people vaccinated against a specific disease in a targeted population. Examples included ads for a local WalMart’s flu vaccine clinic or the Gates Foundation campaign against polio.
Yet, because Facebook categorizes ads about vaccines as “political,” it has led the platform to reject some pro-vaccine messages. “By accepting the framing of vaccine opponents – that vaccination is a political topic, rather than one on which there is widespread public agreement and scientific consensus – Facebook perpetuates the false idea that there is even a debate to be had,” said David Broniatowski, associate professor of engineering management and systems engineering at GW, and principal investigator of the study. “This leads to increased vaccine hesitancy, and ultimately, more epidemics.”
“Worse, these policies actually penalize pro-vaccine content since Facebook requires disclosure of funding sources for ‘political’ ads, but vaccine proponents rarely think of themselves as political. Additionally, vaccine opponents are more organized and more able to make sure that their ads meet these requirements.”
Facebook is a pervasive presence in the lives of many people, meaning its decisions about how to handle vaccine messaging have far-reaching and serious consequences, said Sandra Crouse Quinn, professor and chair of the Department of Family Science at UMD’s School of Public Health, and a principal investigator on the study.
“In today’s social media world, Facebook looms large as a source of information for many, yet their policies have made it more difficult for users to discern what is legitimate, credible vaccine information. This puts public health officials, with limited staff resources for social media campaigns, at a true disadvantage, just when we need to communicate the urgency of vaccines as a means to protect our children and our families,” said Quinn.
The researchers note that the data gathered for this study from Facebook’s Ad Archive was collected in December 2018 and February 2019, before Facebook’s March 2019 announcement of updated advertising policies designed to limit the spread of vaccine-related misinformation. This study provides a baseline to compare how new policy changes may change the reach of ads from anti-vaccine organizations. Those standards, issued in response to the proliferation of anti-vaccination misinformation that coincided with measles outbreaks across the U.S.in early 2019, include that Facebook will block advertisements that include false content about vaccines and disallow advertisers from targeting ads to people “interested in vaccine controversies,” as they were previously able to do.
Yet, the messengers may simply mutate their messages, virus-like, to avoid the tightening standards. “There is a whole set of ads that focus on themes of freedom’ or ‘choice’ and that elude the Facebook rules around vaccine ads,” Broniatowski said.
Jamison says that the research team will continue to study how anti-vaccine arguments are spreading on Facebook and how the company is responding to demands from public health organizations to clean up its act.
“While everyone knows that Facebook can be used to spread misinformation, few people realize the control that advertisers have to target their message,” said Mark Dredze, a John C. Malone associate professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins. “For a few thousand dollars, a small number of anti-vaccine groups can micro-target their message, exploiting vulnerabilities in the health of the public.”
Learn more: Inoculating against the spread of viral misinformation
The Latest on: Misinformation
- Twitter’s misinformation problem is much bigger than Trump. The crowd may help solve it.on January 25, 2021 at 7:03 pm
Twitter's Birdwatch pilot lets selected users write corrections and fact checks on potentially misleading tweets.
- Twitter Launches 'Birdwatch,' a Community to Help Moderate Misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 5:57 pm
Twitter announced on Monday that it had officially launched Birdwatch, a program designed to combat misinformation on the platform by deploying a small group of users to flag potentially misleading ...
- Twitter Unveils 'Community-driven' Effort To Fight Misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 5:34 pm
Twitter announced a new initiative Monday to enlist users to flag misinformation on its platform through a project known as Birdwatch.
- Twitter to implement new program to combat misinformation following allegations of censorshipon January 25, 2021 at 4:24 pm
Social media giant Twitter announced a new feature to its platform to combat the spread of misinformation. The system, dubbed "Birdwatch," allows users, who do not have to be certified fact-checkers ...
- Twitter introduces community-driven tool to tackle misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 3:32 pm
Twitter Inc said on Monday it was launching a new community-driven program that would allow users to identify misleading information in tweets and write notes to provide informative context.
- Twitter announces crowdsource tool to fight misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 2:27 pm
Birdwatch, a Twitter pilot project is open to about 1,000 users who will write notes with corrections and accurate information directly into misleading tweets - a method that has the potential to get ...
- Birdwatch: Twitter pilot will allow users to flag misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 1:49 pm
Twitter will allow users to flag and annotate misleading or inaccurate tweets in ongoing efforts to address misinformation on the platform The pilot program, called Birdwatch, is being tested in the ...
- Twitter bets on crowdsourcing to help combat misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 1:24 pm
Twitter on Monday launched Birdwatch, an experiment that relies on the social network's users to provide context to tweets and to combat misinformation.
- Twitter Launches Birdwatch, A Wikipedia-Style Approach To Fight Misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 12:21 pm
In a significant attempt to overhaul how it moderates content, Twitter on Monday unveiled Birdwatch, a pilot program to crowdsource fact-checks to combat misinformation. Birdwatch will allow regular ...
- Twitter Feature Asks Users to Help Fight Misinformationon January 25, 2021 at 11:43 am
Twitter Inc. said it will ask users to monitor the site for misinformation, and post notes with more context about a tweet’s topic to help clear up potential confusion.
via Bing News
The Latest on: Anti-vaccine messages
- Sanders makes her entrance as Portman announces his exiton January 25, 2021 at 10:18 am
ROB PORTMAN (R-Ohio) announced today he won’t run for reelection in 2022, citing Washington dysfunction as the reason. “It has gotten harder and harder to break through the partisan gridlock and make ...
- Anti-Vaccine Groups Exploit Coincidental Illness to Undermine COVID-19 Vaccinationson January 25, 2021 at 2:48 am
Anti-vaccine groups are exploiting the suffering and death of people who happen to fall ill after receiving a covid shot, threatening to undermine the largest vaccination campaign in U.S. history.
- Beware of anti-vaccine scaremongeringon January 20, 2021 at 1:31 pm
Unverified information, unfounded fears and misleading warnings being spread on chat groups and social media about the dangers of Covid-19 vaccinations can have a very real effect of influencing ...
- Beware of anti-vaccine scaremongeringon January 20, 2021 at 1:14 pm
One message described how several thousand people ... Whether motivated by fear, ignorance or a deliberate anti-vaccine agenda, the barrage of misinformation has come into public discussion ...
- Texas Anti-vaccine group got $166K PPP loanon January 19, 2021 at 3:57 am
An anti-vaccine group based in Texas got a federal loan last year The Informed Consent Action Network received $166,000 from the Paycheck Protection Program in May as Covid-19 ravaged the economy.
- Texas-based anti-vaccine group received federal bailout funds in May as pandemic ragedon January 18, 2021 at 6:33 pm
Texas-based anti-vaccine organization Informed Consent Action ... are countering skepticism "At a minimum, it's a mixed message from the government," said Timothy Callaghan, an assistant professor ...
- Trump administration bailed out prominent anti-vaccine groups with more than $800,000 in loans during pandemicon January 18, 2021 at 1:52 pm
WASHINGTON - Five prominent anti-vaccine organizations that have been known to spread misleading information about the coronavirus received more than $850,000 in loans from the federal Paycheck ...
- Texas-based anti-vaccine group got bailout funds from Payment Protection Programon January 18, 2021 at 1:49 pm
(TEXAS TRIBUNE) - Texas-based anti-vaccine organization Informed Consent ... “At a minimum, it’s a mixed message from the government,” said Timothy Callaghan, an assistant professor in ...
- Texas-based anti-vaccine group received federal bailout funds in May as pandemic ragedon January 18, 2021 at 12:37 pm
The Austin-based group founded by anti-vaccine activist Del Bigtree regularly posts information questioning the safety of the coronavirus vaccines. Doctors and scientists say both the Moderna and the ...
- The Trump administration bailed out prominent anti-vaccine groups during a pandemicon January 18, 2021 at 11:44 am
Five groups got more than $850,000 in loans to help small businesses through the pandemic. The groups have been penalized by Facebook for spreading misinformation.
via Bing News