One study says coffee is good for you, while another study says that it’s not. They’re both right, within context. This dichotomy together with an environment of distrust spurred by anecdotes, fake news, and to a large extent, social media, has created a skeptical and misinformed public.
As a result, researchers from Florida Atlantic University’s Schmidt College of Medicine and collaborators say society is rejecting the facts. Now more than ever, medical researchers must help the public understand the rigorous process of science, which has been around for thousands of years. In return, the public has to pay attention, realize that one size doesn’t fit all, and understand that the answers are not just black or white. Lives are depending on it.
In an article published in the American Journal of Medicine , the researchers highlight opportunities for academic institutions to achieve and maintain research integrity, which encompasses accountability for all scientific and financial issues, including human subjects’ and animal protections, investigator accountability, grant submission, design, conduct, analyses, and interpretation of findings, oversight of colleagues and students, environmental health and safety, among others. Research integrity focuses on the many positive attributes that should be sought and maintained by academic institutions as well as their faculty, staff, and trainees. This includes transparency, rigor, and reproducibility.
The best way for medical researchers to meet this challenge is by continuing to ensure integrity, rigor, reproducibility and replication of their science and to earn the public’s trust by being morally responsible and completely free of any influences. Medical researchers have a passion for truth and discovery, therefore, integrity and trust are essential attributes.
“The reason that the public has lost trust and confidence in science is multifaceted and complicated,” said Janet Robishaw, Ph.D., senior author, senior associate dean for research, and chair of the Department of Biomedical Science in FAU’s Schmidt College of Medicine, and a member of the FAU Brain Institute (I-BRAIN), one of the University’s four research pillars. “One of the main reasons is anecdotal stories, which can be very powerful, and are being given too much weight. There’s so much news coming out from so many sources including social media. That’s why it’s imperative for the public to discern an anecdote from scientific results in a peer-reviewed journal. This is how the premise that vaccinations cause autism evolved along with fabricated results that pushed the anti-vaccination movement.”
Robishaw and corresponding author Charles H. Hennekens, M.D., Dr.PH, first Sir Richard Doll Professor and senior academic advisor in FAU’s Schmidt College of Medicine, stress that research integrity starts with investigators who share the guiding principles of honesty, openness, and accountability and who provide scientific and ethical mentorship to their trainees. As researchers compete for increasingly limited resources and face growing challenges with evolving technologies, broad consensus is required across the research enterprise, including funding agencies, medical journals as well as all academic institutions, to address these increasingly major clinical, ethical and legal challenges.
“Our common goal should be to return public trust in our research enterprise, which has done so much good for so many,” said Robishaw. “The more we can do as scientists to promote our guiding principles of rigor, transparency, honesty and reproducibility and to provide the best evidence possible and get people to understand them, the greater the likelihood that they will listen to the message and follow it.”
Among the opportunities the authors provide for enhancing research integrity include identifying the best benchmarking practices, establishing a research compliance infrastructure and implementing a quality assurance plan. These priorities should include assessing the research climate, developing policies and responsibilities for ethics investigations, and providing a process for resolution of formal disputes. In addition, establishing lists of independent experts to conduct periodic reviews of institutional procedures could be helpful. Reinforcing existing regulatory policies that include emails regarding grant routing and regulatory policies, and providing both formal and informal training to faculty, staff, and trainees are other suggestions the authors provide.
“We should not allow research misconduct committed by a very small minority of researchers to detract from the growing focus on efforts to improve the overall quality of the research process carried out by the vast majority,” said Hennekens. “I continue to believe that the overwhelming majority of researchers strive for and achieve scientific excellence and research integrity.”
In conclusion, the authors, which include David L. DeMets, Ph.D., professor emeritus, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Sarah K. Wood, M.D., senior associate dean for medical education, and Phillip Boiselle, M.D., dean, both in FAU’s Schmidt College of Medicine, emphasize that research integrity requires synchronicity and collaboration between as well as within all academic institutions.
“If we fail to maintain research integrity we will lose public trust and it will lead to avoidable consequences of substantial penalties, financial and otherwise, adverse publicity and reputational damage,” said Robishaw. “Scientists must strive to self-regulate and earn public trust to advance health.”
The Latest on: Society is rejecting facts
via Google News
The Latest on: Society is rejecting facts
- Biden addresses nation's information crisis: We must 'defeat the lies'on January 20, 2021 at 1:53 pm
In a sharp break with his predecessor, President Joe Biden vowed during his inaugural address Wednesday to tackle the information crisis plaguing American politics and society.
- Human rights organizations respond to NSO: victims’ voices will not be silencedon January 7, 2021 at 3:22 pm
In their opposition, NSO argued that the court should reject the brief on the grounds that it duplicates other amici briefs and introduces allegedly impermissible facts about NSO and ... perspective ...
- Why We’re Prone to Denialon January 4, 2021 at 7:46 pm
A vocal segment of society simply denied the facts before them. Denial is on the forefront of American minds and screens. We’re in an era of pandemic skepticism and a rejection of public health advice ...
- THE BIG READ: Hero or villain? The battle for the truth about Winston Churchill and Scotlandon January 2, 2021 at 9:55 pm
But his political rejection by Dundee has morphed into the ... To attempt to set the record straight, the International Churchill Society has published an edition of its quarterly magazine ...
- Iran: Time for a New Approachon December 27, 2020 at 4:00 pm
Rejecting the conventional wisdom that Iran ... tapping into the Task Force members’ extensive expertise on Iranian politics and society. It includes a comprehensive chronology of important ...
- Historian Anthony Harkins on the real story of white poverty and "Hillbilly Elegy"on December 27, 2020 at 11:05 am
While some critics have condemned the film as melodramatic shlock — the Atlantic declared "Hillbilly Elegy" to be one of the worst films of the year — the public appears to reject those ...
- Commentary: Living in a cocoon of denial is cozy but irrationalon December 27, 2020 at 2:18 am
Contemporary American society gives us many examples ... our confidence in education and to learning. They reject scientifically-proven facts in favor of half-baked, ill-founded conjecture.
- YOURSAY | Plus-size pageant is about self-esteem, not hedonismon December 24, 2020 at 4:02 am
Firstly, what facts do they have that makes them ... build their self-confidence and to seek acceptance in society. When the world is rejecting racism, gender discrimination and crusading for ...
- A conservative justice in Wisconsin says he followed the law, not the politicson December 20, 2020 at 5:43 pm
But Hagedorn, a member of the conservative Federalist Society, who in 2016 founded a ... on two separate occasions, reject President Donald Trump's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's ...
- George Soros calls for Facebook execs' removal after comments on regulationon August 17, 2020 at 9:16 am
In a letter to the editor, Soros told the Financial Times that Facebook should, on its own, reject political advertising ... Soros, who leads the Open Society Foundation, argued that neither ...
via Bing News