EVEN HIGH-INCOME COUNTRIES ARE FOUND LACKING AND SCORE ONLY IN THE AVERAGE RANGE OF PREPAREDNESS
A new Global Health Security Index released today, the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across 195 countries, suggests that not a single country in the world is fully prepared to handle an epidemic or pandemic. The GHS Index is a joint project of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), with research by The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). The Center for Health Security is a part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The inaugural GHS Index finds severe weaknesses in countries’ abilities to prevent, detect, and respond to significant disease outbreaks. The average overall 2019 GHS Index score is slightly over 40 out of a possible score of 100. Among the 60 highest-income countries assessed, the average score is 51.9.
Jennifer Nuzzo, associate professor at the Bloomberg School and senior scholar at the Center for Health Security, said the GHS Index, developed with guidance from an International Panel of Experts from 13 countries, can be used by health ministers and international organizations, philanthropists and funders, academics and researchers.
“The GHS Index finds that no country is fully prepared for naturally occurring, intentional, or accidental infectious disease outbreaks,” Nuzzo said. “Knowing that there is work to do, countries can use the index to identify gaps, build preparedness and best practices, and track progress over time.”
“Whether they be natural, accidental, or deliberate, infectious disease outbreaks can cause significant harm to health, peace, and prosperity if countries are not adequately prepared,” said Center for Health Security director Tom Inglesby. “It is important for national leaders to understand the risks that infectious diseases pose and commit to making improvements in preparedness for these events.”
The GHS Index assessed countries across six categories, 34 indicators, and 140 questions, using only open-source information and data from international organizations, including the World Health Organization, the World Organisation for Animal Health, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UN), and the World Bank.
The Index found that:
- Fewer than 7 percent of countries score in the highest tier in the category assessing the prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens.
- Only 19 percent of countries receive top marks (scoring a 66.7 out of 100 or higher) in the category assessing early detection and reporting of epidemics of potential international concern.
- Fewer than 5 percent of countries score in the highest tier in rapid response to and mitigation of spread of an epidemic.
- With an average score of 26.4 out of 100, having a sufficient and robust health sector to treat the sick and protect health workers was the lowest-scoring category.
The GHS Index findings and recommendations for addressing significant gaps in global health security come amid an ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo and five years after the UN Security Council met in crisis over the Ebola epidemic in West Africa.
At a time when risks are magnified by a rapidly changing and interconnected world and rapid technology advances make it easier to create and engineer pathogens, knowing the risks is clearly not enough. Political will is needed to protect people from the consequence of epidemics, to take action to save lives, and to build a safer and more secure world.
A core principle of the GHS Index is that health security is a collective responsibility. The GHS Index offers 33 recommendations for individual countries and for the international community. Recommendations include:
- The UN Secretary-General should call a heads-of-state-level summit by 2021 on biological threats, including a focus on financing and emergency response.
- National governments should commit to take action to address health security risks.
- Health security capacity in every country should be transparent and regularly measured, and results should be published at least once every two years.
- Leaders should improve coordination in insecure environments, especially linkages between security and public health authorities.
- New financing mechanisms should be established to fill preparedness gaps, such as a new multilateral global health security matching fund and expansion of World Bank International Development Association allocations to include preparedness.
- The UN Secretary-General should designate a permanent facilitator or unit for high-consequence biological events.
- Countries should test their health security capacities and publish after-action reviews, at least annually.
- Governments and donors should take into account countries’ political and security risk factors when supporting health security capacity development.
The GHS Index was developed over two and a half years. Key steps included an initial pilot project to test the framework; reviews by the International Panel of Experts that includes 21 experts from 13 countries; a yearlong data collection and validation process by 110 EIU researchers and reviews throughout the world; and opportunities for governments to validate data.
The Latest on: Preparedness for epidemics and pandemics
[google_news title=”” keyword=”preparedness for epidemics and pandemics” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Preparedness for epidemics and pandemics
- Countries Prepare for China's Pneumonia Outbreak to Spreadon November 27, 2023 at 9:12 am
Many parts of China have been hit by the surprising surge in the illness that has particularly impacted children.
- How China's Pneumonia Outbreak Compares to COVID Pandemic Originson November 27, 2023 at 5:54 am
"This is not an indication of a novel pathogen," the World Health Organization's Maria Van Kerkhove said of a recent spike in respiratory illnesses in China.
- What's the fate of California's pandemic preparedness ballot measure backed by Sam Bankman-Fried?on November 27, 2023 at 3:00 am
The convicted cryptocurrency executive was a major backer of a ballot measure to tax the wealthy to pay for pandemic preparedness. Since his arrest, contributions have dried up.
- Pandemic preparednesson November 23, 2023 at 4:01 pm
As home to the PRAIRIE Hub for Pandemic Preparedness, the University of Alberta is one of the national multidisciplinary research hubs accelerating development of those new vaccines, diagnostics ...
- How African countries can prepare for the next pandemicon November 22, 2023 at 4:00 pm
To achieve health security in African countries, we must build resilience and collaboration in health systems and prioritise pandemic preparedness, prevention, and response, write Jean Kaseya and ...
- Chris Whitty: Britain’s Covid plans were ‘woefully deficient’ – even for a flu pandemicon November 21, 2023 at 10:41 am
Professor Sir Chris Whitty told the Covid inquiry it was clear in early 2020 that plans in place were not going to be particularly helpful in the crisis ...
- Prepare for Pandemics or CBRN Threats? We must do both.on November 20, 2023 at 4:00 pm
Efforts to prepare for pandemic influenza in the early 2000’s were not maintained by appropriations from the Congress after the H1N1 pandemic in 2009. This is a large part of why there were ...
- NAPE gathers home-care workers to share concerns — and prepare for upcoming contract talkson November 20, 2023 at 7:27 am
A weekend conference organized by Newfoundland and Labrador's largest union brought about 100 home-care support workers together in St. John's to discuss shared experiences and concerns.
- Where there is a will, there is a way: independent assessment of member state compliance with the pandemic agreementon November 17, 2023 at 4:04 pm
On Oct 16, the world got its first glimpse of the complete draft negotiating text of the proposed pandemic agreement aimed at improving collective pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.1 ...
- Pandemic preparedness is in limboon November 17, 2023 at 10:00 am
And on Capitol Hill: Reauthorization of the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act, which instructs public health agencies on how to prepare for future health threats, faces a tough road.
via Bing News