What does it take for a human to trust a robot? That is what Army researchers are uncovering in a new study into how humans and robots work together.
Research into human-agent teaming, or HAT, has examined how the transparency of agents–such as robots, unmanned vehicles or software agents–influences human trust, task performance, workload and perceptions of the agent. Agent transparency refers to its ability to convey to humans its intent, reasoning process and future plans.
New Army-led research finds that human confidence in robots decreases after the robot makes a mistake, even when it is transparent with its reasoning process. The paper, “Agent Transparency and Reliability in HumanRobot Interaction: The Influence on User Confidence and Perceived Reliability,” has been published in the August issue of IEEE-Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.
To date, research has largely focused on HAT with perfectly reliable intelligent agents–meaning the agents do not make mistakes–but this is one of the few studies that has explored how agent transparency interacts with agent reliability. In this latest study, humans witnessed a robot making a mistake, and researchers focused on whether the humans perceived the robot to be less reliable, even when the human was provided insight into the robot’s reasoning process.
“Understanding how the robot’s behavior influences their human teammates is crucial to the development of effective human-robot teams, as well as the design of interfaces and communication methods between team members,” said Dr. Julia Wright, principal investigator for this project and researcher at U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command’s Army Research Laboratory, also known as ARL. “This research contributes to the Army’s Multi-Domain Operations efforts to ensure overmatch in artificial intelligence-enabled capabilities. But it is also interdisciplinary, as its findings will inform the work of psychologists, roboticists, engineers, and system designers who are working toward facilitating better understanding between humans and autonomous agents in the effort to make autonomous teammates rather than simply tools.
This research was a joint effort between ARL and the University of Central Florida Institute for Simulations and Training, and is the third and final study in the Autonomous Squad Member project, sponsored by the Office of Secretary of Defense’s Autonomy Research Pilot Initiative. The ASM is a small ground robot that interacts with and communicates with an infantry squad.
Prior ASM studies investigated how a robot would communicate with a human teammate. Using the Situation awareness-based Agent Transparency model as a guide, various visualization methods to convey the agent’s goals, intents, reasoning, constraints, and projected outcomes were explored and tested. An at-a-glance iconographic module was developed based on these early study findings, and then was used in subsequent studies to explore the efficacy of agent transparency in HAT.
Researchers conducted this study in a simulated environment, in which participants observed a human-agent Soldier team, which included the ASM, traversing a training course. The participants’ task was to monitor the team and evaluate the robot. The Soldier-robot team encountered various events along the course and responded accordingly. While the Soldiers always responded correctly to the event, occasionally the robot misunderstood the situation, leading to incorrect actions. The amount of information the robot shared varied between trials. While the robot always explained its actions, the reasons behind its actions and the expected outcome of its actions, in some trials the robot also shared the reasoning behind its decisions, its underlying logic. Participants viewed multiple Soldier-robot teams, and their assessments of the robots were compared.
The study found that regardless of the robot’s transparency in explaining its reasoning, the robot’s reliability was the ultimate determining factor in influencing the participants’ projections of the robot’s future reliability, trust in the robot and perceptions of the robot. That is, after participants witnessed an error, they continued to rate the robot’s reliability lower, even when the robot did not make any subsequent errors. While these evaluations slowly improved over time as long as the robot committed no further errors, participants’ confidence in their own assessments of the robot’s reliability remained lowered throughout the remainder of the trials, when compared to participants who never saw an error. Furthermore, participants who witnessed a robot error reported lower trust in the robot, when compared to those who never witnessed a robot error.
Increasing agent transparency was found to improve participants’ trust in the robot, but only when the robot was collecting or filtering information. This could indicate that sharing in-depth information may mitigate some of the effects of unreliable automation for specific tasks, Wright said. Additionally, participants rated the unreliable robot as less animate, likable, intelligent, and safe than the reliable robot.
“Earlier studies suggest that context matters in determining the usefulness of transparency information,” Wright said. “We need to better understand which tasks require more in-depth understanding of the agent’s reasoning, and how to discern what that depth would entail. Future research should explore ways to deliver transparency information based on the tasking requirements.”
The Latest on: Human-agent teaming
via Google News
The Latest on: Human-agent teaming
- One.com reviewon January 10, 2021 at 11:34 pm
One.com is a competent Denmark-based web hosting provider which can give everything that is needed to those with simple needs. However, those who do not fall into this category will have to look ...
- Former senior CIA officer recalls killing of service members by suicide bomberon December 30, 2020 at 4:12 am
But a human agent on the ground really is a key piece ... There was a crack kind of security team we had. I would even to this day of trusted with my life, with every one of those members of ...
- Faced with Customer-Friction Problems? 4 Ways Automated Customer Service Empowers Your Businesson December 17, 2020 at 3:42 pm
Not only that, automating routine tasks using AI and ML technologies — AI-powered voicebots and other automated self-service technologies — save customer service team hours of manual ... can route the ...
- 16 KPIs to Measure Chatbot Effectivenesson December 17, 2020 at 10:39 am
chatbot interaction rate will show you how efficiently your chatbot is routing conversations to a human agent. If you’re ... average number of tickets your team has had overtime due to your ...
- 6 Habits of Organizations with Successful Remote Supporton December 15, 2020 at 3:43 pm
When contact center agents and field technicians are able to collaborate as a team, not only do problems get solved more ... When the case needs to be escalated to a human agent, there is a warm ...
- Bank ABC wins innovation awardon December 13, 2020 at 12:12 am
The award recognises Bank ABC’s remarkable approach to customer service for its new-age digital, mobile-only bank ila, through an emotionally intelligent digital-human agent with autonomous ... I want ...
- Bank ABC Wins the 2020 Gartner Eye on Innovation Awardon December 12, 2020 at 7:37 pm
The award recognises Bank ABC’s remarkable approach to customer service for its new-age digital, mobile-only bank ila, through an emotionally intelligent digital-human agent with autonomous ...
- BMIT Technologies plc acquires stake in EBO Ltdon December 5, 2020 at 11:42 pm
This is achieved by bringing together best-in-class infrastructure and a talented team of people with expertise ... to be indistinguishable from a human agent while continuously learning how ...
- ANN-SONIC-NICO 10th International Workshop on Network Theoryon February 14, 2020 at 9:34 am
The theme for this year is ‘Human AI Social Networks @ Work’ and will focus on topical areas such as human agent/robot teaming, virtual organization, crowd sourcing, social media, networks and more.
- Jamiahus Waltonon September 25, 2019 at 9:39 am
Generally, my research focuses on teams, team training, virtual collaboration, and computer-supported cooperative work. Recently, my work has focused on developing Intelligent Team Tutoring Systems ...
via Bing News