Finding natural gas leaks more quickly and at lower cost could reduce methane emissions. Ten promising technologies mounted on drones, trucks and airplanes were tested last year. The results are in.
On trucks, drones and airplanes, 10 promising technologies for finding natural gas leaks swiftly and cheaply competed in the Mobile Monitoring Challenge, the first independent assessment of moving gas leak detectors at well sites. The organizers of the contest – Stanford University’s Natural Gas Initiative and the Environmental Defense Fund – describe the outcomes in a study published Sept. 10 in Elementa by University of California Press.
While billed as a “challenge,” the organizers had no intention of declaring a winner, as the technologies focused on different aspects of leak detection, such as exact location or size of the leak. While the technologies are still in development, overall, they all found gas leaks quite well.
The study examined finding leaks at production equipment that can be found in a gas field, not on finding below-ground leaks that might occur from pipes in cities.
Leaks in the production, processing and transport of natural gas emit methane – the main constituent of natural gas – into the atmosphere. A greenhouse gas, methane is 36 times more potent than carbon dioxide. In 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency moved to reduce methane emissions across the natural gas industry, which spurred the development of faster, less expensive detection technologies. Late last month, however, the EPA moved to roll back these methane regulations.
“The technologies are generally effective at detecting leaks, and can act as a first line of defense,” said Adam Brandt, an associate professor of energy resources engineering and the senior author of the study. “Gas system operators will often want to confirm leaks with conventional optical gas imaging systems, but these mobile technologies usually tell you where to look for leaks very quickly.”
A crew of two people using a conventional imaging system can visit four to six well pads a day. All the mobile technologies are considerably faster than that, though their speeds vary a lot. Plane-based systems work more quickly than trucks, which are faster than drones. Because worker time is a large part of detection cost, speeding up detection allows oil and gas companies to find more leaks while spending less money.
As part of the Mobile Monitoring Challenge, nine corporations and a university research team participated last year at controlled testing facilities in Fort Collins, Colorado, and near Sacramento, California. All technologies were effective at detecting leaks. Eight of nine detected leaks correctly 75 percent of the time. (One technology did not have enough flights to be included in the study’s summary.) Five of nine systems detected 90 percent or more of the leaks, including tiny emissions of one cubic foot of gas per hour.
However, most of the systems tested need to improve their ability to quantify the size of the leaks. Also, the technologies varied in their ability to detect the precise location of the leaks, though this is often by design.
For example, one startup’s drone-based system detected 100 percent of leaks and had no false positives. Further, it accurately identified the leaking piece of equipment – rather than just the well pad – 84 percent of the time. However, when quantifying the size of leaks, the system’s estimates were relatively close just 36 percent of the time. For the other eight systems, by the same relatively strict measure, quantification accuracy ranged from 18 to 53 percent.
“This is only the first step to demonstrating that these technologies could help reduce emissions on a level equivalent to existing approaches,” Brandt said. “The tests were run in the spring of 2018, and I’m sure most – if not all – of these technologies have been improved since then.”
Further advances could be in jeopardy, however.
“The recent U.S. EPA announcement about rolling back methane regulations is not just bad for the environment, but also deprives oil and gas communities of high-paying, local jobs that these innovative technology companies could create. Rolling back the regulations could stifle development of these technologies,” said Arvind Ravikumar, lead author of the study. Ravikumar was a postdoctoral scholar at Stanford at the time of the project and is now an assistant professor at the Harrisburg University of Science & Technology.
An assessment like this can help regulators better understand these systems and provide a possible path to large-scale adoption for compliance purposes, the researchers said.
Designs for different uses
The Mobile Monitoring Challenge was not a head-to-head competition because the technologies tested are designed to accomplish different things.
“No single technology can meet all the requirements for leak detection and quantification across the natural gas supply chain,” Ravikumar said. “The key to large-scale deployment is to match the strength of each technology, like speed, accuracy and cost, with the right leak detection application. What works for a complex processing facility might not work for long-distance transmission pipelines.”
The systems of some participants focus on identifying leaks only as coming from a cluster of equipment, which could include a wellhead, a separator and a tank, for example. In such cases, operators would use optical gas imaging systems or similar technology to identify the specific source of the leak before initiating repairs.
Similarly, two of the technologies tested are designed to quickly find big leaks, rather than all leaks. More than half the methane lost in natural gas production and processing comes from just 5 percent of leaks. Finding and fixing these “super-emitters” is critical to reducing methane emissions.
Even without strict regulations, natural gas companies could reduce emissions voluntarily. Inexpensive detectors combined with focused use of optical gas imaging systems could pay for themselves by reducing losses of company product. This is particularly true in parts of the world where natural gas prices are higher than in North America.
The Latest on: Methane emissions
[google_news title=”” keyword=”methane emissions” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Methane emissions
- Measuring and modeling methane emissions in wetlandson March 1, 2024 at 6:32 am
Global atmospheric methane concentrations have risen steadily since 2006. Growth in agriculture, transportation, and industry are partly to blame, but so too is the rise in biogenic emissions, or ...
- As COP29 host, Azerbaijan has tremendous opportunity to help world keep tackling methane emissions - DAS Kimberly Harrington (Exclusive interview)on March 1, 2024 at 12:00 am
BAKU, Azerbaijan, March 1. As the COP29 host, Azerbaijan has a tremendous opportunity to help world keep tackling methane emissions, Kimberly D. Harrington, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau ...
- This methane-sniffing satellite will leave climate polluters nowhere to hideon February 29, 2024 at 4:00 pm
Set to launch as early as next week, MethaneSAT will partner with Google to map leaks from the oil and gas industry and beyond.
- The Oil And Gas Industry: Could They, Should They, Try To Reach Net-Zero Emissions By 2050?on February 29, 2024 at 2:12 pm
Oil and gas companies are starting to pivot toward climate change, but how far should they pivot? They could diversify, or they could stay with business as usual and hope for a moonshot solution.
- Surprising methane discovery in Yukon glaciers: 'Much more widespread than we thought'on February 29, 2024 at 12:56 pm
Global melting is prying the lid off methane stocks, the extent of which we do not know. A young researcher from the University of Copenhagen has discovered high concentrations of the powerful ...
- NY attorney general sues world's largest beef producer over methane emissions, climate commitmentson February 29, 2024 at 7:47 am
New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a sweeping lawsuit accusing the world's largest producer of beef of misleading the public about its commitments to sustainability.
- New Demands to Measure Emissions Raise Cautious Hopes in Pennsylvania Among Environmental Sleuths Who Monitor Fracking Siteson February 27, 2024 at 9:41 pm
For the first time, Pennsylvania fracking companies are facing real-time scrutiny from federal and state regulators over emissions of methane and other harmful air pollutants at drilling sites and ...
- ‘The technologies are there’: How oil and gas companies must go beyond pledges to abate methane and cut emissionson February 27, 2024 at 4:00 pm
Solutions already exist to drive down global methane emissions – they just have to be properly utilised by oil and gas companies for the industry to keep to their pledges, says Mark Brownstein, senior ...
- Methane-Spewing Gas and Oil Drillers Owe the US Billions—in Theoryon February 21, 2024 at 4:00 pm
New research suggests that those sticks could soon batter the oil and gas industry, which is responsible for a third of all methane emissions in the US. An IRA provision directs the Environmental ...
- Was COP28 really a turning point for reducing methane emissions?on February 20, 2024 at 6:17 am
Boris Martor of Bird & Bird discusses measures to reduce and control methane emissions, particularly in the European Union and United States.
via Bing News