Telepathic communication might be one step closer to reality thanks to new research from the University of Washington. A team created a method that allows three people to work together to solve a problem using only their minds.
In BrainNet, three people play a Tetris-like game using a brain-to-brain interface. This is the first demonstration of two things: a brain-to-brain network of more than two people, and a person being able to both receive and send information to others using only their brain. The team published its results April 16 in the Nature journal Scientific Reports, though this research previously attracted media attention after the researchers posted it September to the preprint site arXiv.
“Humans are social beings who communicate with each other to cooperate and solve problems that none of us can solve on our own,” said corresponding author Rajesh Rao, the CJ and Elizabeth Hwang professor in the UW’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering and a co-director of the Center for Neurotechnology. “We wanted to know if a group of people could collaborate using only their brains. That’s how we came up with the idea of BrainNet: where two people help a third person solve a task.”
As in Tetris, the game shows a block at the top of the screen and a line that needs to be completed at the bottom. Two people, the Senders, can see both the block and the line but can’t control the game. The third person, the Receiver, can see only the block but can tell the game whether to rotate the block to successfully complete the line. Each Sender decides whether the block needs to be rotated and then passes that information from their brain, through the internet and to the brain of the Receiver. Then the Receiver processes that information and sends a command — to rotate or not rotate the block — to the game directly from their brain, hopefully completing and clearing the line.
The team asked five groups of participants to play 16 rounds of the game. For each group, all three participants were in different rooms and couldn’t see, hear or speak to one another.
The Senders each could see the game displayed on a computer screen. The screen also showed the word “Yes” on one side and the word “No” on the other side. Beneath the “Yes” option, an LED flashed 17 times per second. Beneath the “No” option, an LED flashed 15 times a second.
“Once the Sender makes a decision about whether to rotate the block, they send ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ to the Receiver’s brain by concentrating on the corresponding light,” said first author Linxing Preston Jiang, a student in the Allen School’s combined bachelor’s/master’s degree program.
The Senders wore electroencephalography caps that picked up electrical activity in their brains. The lights’ different flashing patterns trigger unique types of activity in the brain, which the caps can pick up. So, as the Senders stared at the light for their corresponding selection, the cap picked up those signals, and the computer provided real-time feedback by displaying a cursor on the screen that moved toward their desired choice. The selections were then translated into a “Yes” or “No” answer that could be sent over the internet to the Receiver.
“To deliver the message to the Receiver, we used a cable that ends with a wand that looks like a tiny racket behind the Receiver’s head. This coil stimulates the part of the brain that translates signals from the eyes,” said co-author Andrea Stocco, a UW assistant professor in the Department of Psychology and the Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, or I-LABS. “We essentially ‘trick’ the neurons in the back of the brain to spread around the message that they have received signals from the eyes. Then participants have the sensation that bright arcs or objects suddenly appear in front of their eyes.”
If the answer was, “Yes, rotate the block,” then the Receiver would see the bright flash. If the answer was “No,” then the Receiver wouldn’t see anything. The Receiver received input from both Senders before making a decision about whether to rotate the block. Because the Receiver also wore an electroencephalography cap, they used the same method as the Senders to select yes or no.
The Senders got a chance to review the Receiver’s decision and send corrections if they disagreed. Then, once the Receiver sent a second decision, everyone in the group found out if they cleared the line. On average, each group successfully cleared the line 81% of the time, or for 13 out of 16 trials.
The researchers wanted to know if the Receiver would learn over time to trust one Sender over the other based on their reliability. The team purposely picked one of the Senders to be a “bad Sender” and flipped their responses in 10 out of the 16 trials — so that a “Yes, rotate the block” suggestion would be given to the Receiver as “No, don’t rotate the block,” and vice versa. Over time, the Receiver switched from being relatively neutral about both Senders to strongly preferring the information from the “good Sender.”
The team hopes that these results pave the way for future brain-to-brain interfaces that allow people to collaborate to solve tough problems that one brain alone couldn’t solve. The researchers also believe this is an appropriate time to start to have a larger conversation about the ethics of this kind of brain augmentation research and developing protocols to ensure that people’s privacy is respected as the technology improves. The group is working with the Neuroethics team at the Center for Neurotechnology to address these types of issues.
“But for now, this is just a baby step. Our equipment is still expensive and very bulky and the task is a game,” Rao said. “We’re in the ‘Kitty Hawk’ days of brain interface technologies: We’re just getting off the ground.”
Learn and see more: How you and your friends can play a video game together using only your minds
The Latest on: Telepathic communication
[google_news title=”” keyword=”telepathic communication” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Telepathic communication
- A pastor on TikTok claims he's been to hell, saw demons singing Rihanna's musicon January 27, 2023 at 2:07 am
A pastor has been making rounds on TikTok for claiming he had been to hell and saw demons singing Rihanna's songs. In December 2022, pastor and motivator Gerald Johnson shared on TikTok his experience ...
- Priest says he briefly died and went to hell, saw demons singing Rihannaon January 26, 2023 at 7:45 am
A priest claims that he died and briefly visited hell, where he saw demons singing the music of Rihanna. The outlandish and entirely believable claim comes from Michigan clergyman Gerald Johnson, who ...
- DOCOMO Announces World's First Technology that Utilizes Human-Augmentation Platform for Sharing Haptic Information Between Peopleon January 25, 2023 at 12:17 am
TOKYO, Jan 25, 2023 - (JCN Newswire) - NTT DOCOMO, INC., the Embodied Media Project led by Professor Kouta Minamizawa at Keio University Graduate School of Media Design and the Haptics Lab led by ...
- Communications is too important for ChatGPT to shortcuton January 23, 2023 at 12:35 pm
But effective and strategic marketing and communications typically take extensive consideration and care; it’s rarely ever black and white, and it almost always requires a great deal of nuance ...
- 10 Weakest Justice Leaguers With The Most Useful Powerson January 22, 2023 at 4:15 pm
Though these Justice League members may be very weak, they've often made the difference between victory and defeat due to their useful powers.
- Mind reading Sharjah Girl exceedingly rare savanton September 14, 2022 at 9:53 am
Facilitated communication with the parent or another ... However none reported telepathy or mind reading of the type Nandana exhibits.” Asked if Nandana would qualify to be included in the ...
- Russia Says "Super Soldiers" Can Crash Computers With Telepathyon April 4, 2019 at 8:06 am
Russia discovered those techniques, according to the article, by studying telepathic dolphins ... or break television and radio programs and communications," reads the article, according to ...
- Can Twins Really Read Each Other's Minds?on July 23, 2018 at 5:17 am
But is twin telepathy really a thing? The short answer is that while there are plenty of stories out there about twins who claim to have read each other's minds and predicted when the other was in ...
via Bing News