Social media had only a small influence on how much people believed falsehoods about candidates and issues in the last two presidential elections, a pair of new national studies found.
And Facebook – which came under fire for spreading misinformation in the 2016 campaign – actually reduced misperceptions by users in that election compared to those who consumed only other social media.
The results suggest that we need to put the dangers of social media spreading misinformation in perspective, said R. Kelly Garrett, author of the study and professor of communication at The Ohio State University.
“Given the amount of attention given to the issue, it may seem surprising that social media doesn’t have a larger impact on Americans’ belief in falsehoods,” Garrett said.
“It is an issue that we should be concerned about, but it is not the main driver of why so many people believe false information about issues and candidates.”
The study was published today (March 27, 2019) in the journal PLOS ONE.
In previous research, Garrett found evidence suggesting that email contributed to the spread of false information in the 2008 election, before social media was as popular as it is today. Garrett specifically designed these studies to gauge the role of social media in what Americans believed in the last two election campaigns.
Reliance on social media for political news has increased rapidly. In 2012, about two in five Americans reported using social media for political purposes, according to the Pew Research Center.
In 2016, more Americans named Facebook as the source they used for pre-election political information than any other site, including those of major news organizations, this new research found.
“This study began long before ‘fake news’ became as popular a topic as it is today. But the questions that drive this study are very much in keeping with our concerns about how disinformation is spread online,” Garrett said.
During both the 2012 and 2016 election seasons, groups of more than 600 Americans filled out surveys online three times, indicating their social media use at each point as well as their beliefs in confirmed falsehoods.
The 2012 study involved misperceptions about the two presidential candidates, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Participants rated on a five-point scale how much they agreed with eight falsehoods, including “Barack Obama is Muslim, not Christian” and “As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed a health care law providing taxpayer-funded abortions.”
Overall, Republicans tended to hold less accurate beliefs about President Obama than Democrats did, while Democrats held less accurate beliefs about Romney than did Republicans.
Results showed that increasing social media use reduced participants’ belief accuracy about Obama falsehoods, although the effect was small.
In the most extreme case, someone using social media to get political information could have an accuracy score concerning Obama falsehoods almost half a point lower on the five-point scale than someone who did not use social media at all.
Social media use did not influence belief in the Romney falsehoods, Garrett said. One important reason may be that the rumors about Romney were much less known than those about Obama.
The 2016 study focused on false beliefs about four campaign issues. The misperceptions studied were: Repealing the Affordable Care Act would reduce the national debt; Most Muslims support violence against Western countries, including the U.S.; Immigrants are more likely to commit violent crimes than individuals born in the U.S.; and Human activity has no influence on global climate.
After considering more than a dozen potential issues, Garrett selected these four because they were referenced most frequently on the campaign trail and received extensive media coverage, and because of evidence that Americans were at least occasionally mistaken about them.
Results showed that, overall, Republicans beliefs tended to be less accurate than those of Democrats, which made sense because the falsehoods were a prominent part of the Republican campaign strategy, Garrett said.
Participants with higher levels of education held more accurate beliefs.
Unlike in 2012, participants in 2016 were asked which social media platforms they used during each of the three waves of the study.
Facebook was the most popular social media platform for following news among study participants, followed by YouTube and Twitter.
Overall, social media use was not related to participants’ belief accuracy on the four issues.
But the influence of using social media was different for people who used Facebook than for people who only used other platforms. Among the heaviest social media users, those who used Facebook were about a half point more accurate on the five-point scale, on average, than those who didn’t.
“It is not a huge difference, but it does call into question the conventional wisdom that Facebook had an especially harmful influence on campaign issue beliefs,” Garrett said.
He said the small effects found in this study don’t mean we should ignore the problem of fake news shared on social media – but we should reevaluate its role in Americans’ belief in falsehoods.
“We have evidence that foreign powers have tried to sway American elections by sharing falsehoods on social media and that is profoundly troubling. If it has an effect, even a small one, we should be deeply concerned,” he said.
“But we need to have a broader perspective on the problem. We know that Americans hold beliefs that are not accurate, with frightening regularity. And if social media aren’t the primary driver of this, we really should invest more energy into finding out what else is going on.”
The study was based on work supported by the National Science Foundation.
The Latest on: Social media
via Google News
The Latest on: Social media
- Fragmented and humbled: How social media could emerge from the post-election crisison January 24, 2021 at 2:14 pm
Across the political and legal spectrums, people are calling for changes in the way the industry operates. And experts say recent events could have a profound impact on what the industry looks like in ...
- Trump’s removal from social media was warranted — but arbitrary. It’s time for clearer rules.on January 24, 2021 at 10:00 am
THE COMPLETE List of Trump’s Twitter Insults (2015-2021),” reads the headline of a New York Times collection of the now ex-president’s most aggressive missives. The compilation is a disturbing ...
- Indonesia to deport Russian social media star who held partyon January 24, 2021 at 2:01 am
A Russian social media celebrity is being deported from Indonesia after he held a party on the resort island of Bali despite coronavirus restrictions.
- Social Media Buzz: Larry King Dies, Dr. Birx, Heathrow Crowdson January 23, 2021 at 8:20 am
Larry King, the interviewer whose schmoozy style attracted celebrities, politicians and other newsmakers as guests and made him the star of a top-rated U.S. cable talk show, has died. He was 87. King ...
- Prince Harry says what we've all been thinking about social mediaon January 23, 2021 at 6:00 am
For someone who presumably does not have a social media account of their own, Prince Harry sure does have a lot to say about the ways it's been used (and missued) in recent years. In an interview with ...
- ‘Time is running out’: Prince Harry calls for social media reform after U.S. Capitol rioton January 22, 2021 at 8:51 pm
In a Q&A with Fast Company, The Duke of Sussex responds to social media’s role in the Capitol attack and explains why the next step must be to hold social platforms accountable.
- Prince Harry Blames Social Media for Capitol Riot and ‘Harassment’ He and Meghan Receiveon January 22, 2021 at 8:29 pm
In an interview with Fast Company, Prince Harry said, “We are losing loved ones to conspiracy theories, losing a sense of self... and at the largest scale, losing our democracies.” ...
- Prince Harry denies report he and Meghan are quitting social media for goodon January 22, 2021 at 1:32 pm
Prince Harry is doubling down on his calls to reform social media two weeks after an angry mob staged a deadly siege at the U.S. Capitol. Many who laid siege to the Capitol did so on the erroneous ...
- Column: The drive to regulate social media is about partisan politics — and it won’t workon January 22, 2021 at 1:13 pm
Based on the chatter in the corridors of political power and from elite intellectuals these days, one can’t help concluding that Twitter, Facebook and their social media cousins rank as the civilized ...
- Prince Harry says social media misinformation is threat to democracieson January 22, 2021 at 11:52 am
Duke of Sussex calls for more accountability and accuses platforms of shunning responsibility ...
via Bing News