Simply reducing greenhouse gas emissions probably is not going to be sufficient for the planet to escape catastrophic damage from climate change, scientists say.
Additional actions will be required, and one option is solar geoengineering, which could lower temperatures by methods such as reflecting sunlight away from the Earth through the deployment of aerosols in the stratosphere. However, the prospect of experimenting with the Earth’s atmosphere has left some people skeptical, and some outright scared, of the process.
A new study, “Mission-Driven Research for Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering,” published Jan. 7 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, sets out to establish a roadmap for responsible exploration of geoengineering.
“Part of the genesis of this paper is that a long time ago I got tired of going to meetings and not being able to say much more than, ‘If you do geoengineering, it will get colder,’” said lead author Douglas MacMartin, senior research associate and senior lecturer in mechanical and aerospace engineering.
“We actually need to do the research to understand what the impacts are and understand the uncertainties,” MacMartin said. “There are obvious questions about how to govern the technology if it was actually being deploying, or how to make decisions about deploying it. But there’s also been a lot of discussion about how to even govern the research process – and that question should start with understanding what sort of research needs to be done.”
While scientific research traditionally has been motivated by the innate curiosity of scientists grappling with an interesting question, this study finds that geoengineering requires a more mission-driven approach with a clear goal: informing policy.
“It’s the research community’s responsibility to ensure that before people get to a point of saying, ‘Let’s consider using geoengineering,’ we’re able to provide enough information to either say ‘No, here’s why not’ or ‘If you were to do it, this is the best way to do it, here is what we think the impacts are, here are the uncertainties,’” MacMartin said.
The study, which MacMartin co-authored with Ben Kravitz, assistant professor at Indiana University, focuses on the idea of releasing sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, mimicking the eruption of a volcano. This follows a natural process and thus would limit the “unknown unknowns” and enable researchers to calibrate their models. That’s important because, the study finds, that near-term geoengineering research will primarily be modeling.
“I think it’s reasonable to expect that there will be some need for [more] tests, but those will always be small,” MacMartin says. “The upshot of that is, in terms of research governance, it does not necessarily need to address transboundary issues or worry about a slippery slope to deployment in which you agree to one scale of experiment, and then it gets a little bigger, and a little bigger still.
“The research is always going to be very small scale, so there’s a bright line between activities that look like research and activities that look like deployment,” MacMartin added. “Engaging in geoengineering research itself doesn’t have to be scary. I think if you look carefully at what needs to be done, it looks a lot more like climate science research, but focused on a particular goal.”
Given that a recent report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change shows that global warming will pass 1.5 C around 2040, MacMartin sees an urgent need to start making inroads in exploring geoengineering research. It could take up to 20 years before scientists can help policymakers make an informed decision about the effectiveness of the technology.
“I think the main message of this study is that it explicitly asks us to prioritize our research,” Kravitz said. “What do we want to learn, how do we want to learn it, and why will that resolve the most important uncertainties in geoengineering? Large engineering projects handle these sorts of questions all the time with well-established tools. It seems like modifying the climate, the largest engineering project humanity has ever faced, could use some of the same tools.”
MacMartin said geoengineering should be viewed as a supplement to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, not a substitution. He likes to think of the process as an airbag.
“If you know you’re going to get into an accident, you ought to take your foot off the gas and put it on the brake, but you might want airbags, too,” MacMartin said. “The airbag doesn’t change the fact you’re going to get into an accident, but it does mean you’ll have less damage.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- As the planet warms faster, scientists study controversial ways to lower temperatureson January 17, 2021 at 5:19 pm
A team at Harvard University this summer plans to conduct the first of a series of highly controversial tests of what’s known as solar geoengineering, a way to reduce global warming by spreading ...
- Geoengineering the climateon January 14, 2021 at 4:00 pm
A range of technologies — loosely defined as 'geoengineering' — are being explored as responses to climate change. Yet their effectiveness, and whether they should be implemented at all ...
- What are the promises and perils of geoengineering?on January 14, 2021 at 4:00 pm
In a new book, “Has It Come to This? The Promises and Perils of Geoengineering on the Brink,” University at Buffalo researcher Holly Jean Buck and colleagues weigh in on the social, ethical and ...
- Bill Gates-Funded Solar Dimming Project Risks the Lives of Millions and Must be Stoppedon January 14, 2021 at 12:00 am
As reported by Reuters, Dec. 18, 2020, the Bill Gates-funded Harvard solar dimming project has sparked unease in Sweden ...
- Experts: Geoengineering, quality research can help mitigate climate changeon January 10, 2021 at 4:00 pm
Speakers have opined that quality research can play a significant role in reducing the impacts of climate change, and that research and discussion of “geoengineering” is also necessary. They were ...
- More Reflectivity Can Cool the Worldon January 9, 2021 at 9:39 pm
Think of reflectivity as down-to-earth geoengineering. Some simple actions could make a big difference to city life in the long hot summer.
- Is Bill Gates Funding Efforts To Block The Sun?on January 5, 2021 at 2:26 pm
Since 2007, Bill Gates has funded research initiatives that, in part, provide grants for experiments related to solar radiation management — a form of geoengineering controversially proposed as ...
- Planned Harvard balloon test in Sweden stirs solar geoengineering uneaseon January 3, 2021 at 10:02 am
“There are very many real concerns” about the risks of climate change and solar geoengineering, said David Keith, who is involved in the project and is a professor of applied physics at the ...
- Geoengineering must stay peacefulon December 29, 2020 at 4:34 am
This is known as geoengineering that is divided into two types, which are carbon dioxide removal to take out carbon from the air and solar radiation management to reflect a small fraction of ...
- New Risk of Atmospheric Aerosols as Sunscreenon December 27, 2020 at 11:50 pm
Geoengineering, spraying atmospheric aerosols as the technofix answer to a warming planet, has been repeatedly denounced as dangerous by many critics. Now scientists say it could hide another ...
via Bing News