Radical solutions to climate change might save lives, but a commentary in the October 2018 issue of the journal Nature Climate Change calls for caution because geoengineering still lacks a “clean bill of health.”
With global fossil-fuel emissions reaching an all-time high and the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, climate experts have become increasingly interested in “climate engineering,” a set of ambitious and largely undeveloped technologies that could artificially counteract global warming. One proposed approach, called solar radiation management (SRM), would reduce incoming sunlight by injecting tiny aerosol particles into the stratosphere or by brightening clouds. Other approaches would directly remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Even if some combination of these worked, scientists warn that the climate wouldn’t be the same as it was before climate change. And those differences might make a big difference for global health, ecologists Colin Carlson and Christopher Trisos argue in the Nature Climate Change article. The article was written while both were postdoctoral fellows at the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), a unique University of Maryland center funded by the National Science Foundation that brings together science of the natural world with science of human behavior and decision-making.
So far, Carlson and Trisos say, almost nothing is known about the potential health consequences of such geoengineered “solutions.”
“We’re a step before saying these technologies will probably save lives or saying they’re too dangerous to use,” says Carlson. “Right now, what we know is climate and disease are already closely linked, and that raises basic questions about climate engineering. Now, we need answers.”
Carlson gives the example of malaria, a disease mostly confined to the tropics today, but was once widespread in Europe and North America. Recently, scientists found that malaria transmits best at cooler temperatures. In some projections, SRM would disproportionately cool off the tropics–and that might make malaria worse.
“But it’s all guesswork–we can qualitatively talk through possible risks, and that’s what we do here. But we can’t make any judgements without solid, quantitative evidence. And no one’s run those models yet. There’s no data to go off.”
Carlson and Trisos hope to shed some light on these issues over the next two years. They are part of an international, interdisciplinary team that has been recommended for a $50,000 grant from the DECIMALS Fund (Developing Country Impact Modelling Analysis for SRM), which was launched by the Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative to help scientists understand how SRM could affect the “global south”–a term that refers to less developed countries. Eight projects will receive DECIMALS grants that will be announced in October. The fund is administered by The World Academy of Sciences.
“Links between climate change and health are often complex, so climate engineering may impact health in unexpected ways,” says Trisos, now a research affiliate at the African Climate and Development Initiative. “Governments have pledged to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ with the climate system, so it’s critical that we can compare public health risks from climate change to those from climate engineering, in order to decide if climate engineering should even be considered.”
Carlson and Trisos’ DECIMALS research proposal was put together in collaboration with lead researchers Shafiul Alam and Mofizur Rahman (International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research in Bangladesh) and includes epidemiologist Shweta Bansal (Georgetown University), climatologist Alan Robock (Rutgers University), and world-renowned microbiologist and cholera expert Rita Colwell (University of Maryland, formerly the ninth director of the National Science Foundation).
Their team is designed to produce important results on a fast deadline.
“Climate scientists, ecologists and public health researchers are increasingly working together to understand what climate change means for infectious diseases,” says Trisos. “We’re lucky to take advantage of that partnership to tackle a problem this complicated–and this urgent.”
In a perfect world, understanding the possible health impacts of climate engineering might help policymakers make the right call, if other options seem limited. But Carlson says there’s another reason this work is important.
“From a public health standpoint, we’re not likely to be the ones making the call about climate futures. But we want to know what’s coming if climate engineering does happen, and we want to be prepared, first in places like Bangladesh that might have the most to gain but also have the most to lose.”
Bangladesh is the world’s hot spot for cholera and has led the global research program to prevent the disease for several decades, with medical care reducing fatalities from 50 percent to less than 5 percent. Climate change will only increase the pressure that countries like Bangladesh face from infectious diseases like cholera and malaria.
“Whether or not the climate engineering ‘button’ gets pushed, the research we do here still helps us,” Carlson explains. “We’re building our toolbox and getting better at predicting cholera and malaria, and that should save lives, whatever climate change looks like.”
The Latest on: Climate engineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate engineering
- New NASA data sheds light on climate modelson May 17, 2021 at 5:43 am
Have you ever worn a dark T-shirt on a sunny day and felt the fabric warm in the sun's rays? Most of us know dark colors absorb sunlight and light colors reflect it—but did you know this doesn't work ...
- New NASA Multi-Wavelength Data Sheds (Sun) Light on Climate Modelson May 17, 2021 at 5:36 am
Have you ever worn a dark T-shirt on a sunny day and felt the fabric warm in the Sun’s rays? Most of us know dark colors absorb sunlight and light colors reflect it – but did you know this doesn’t ...
- John Kerry: US climate envoy criticised for optimism on clean techon May 16, 2021 at 6:42 am
America’s climate envoy John Kerry has been ridiculed for saying technologies that don’t yet exist will play a huge role in stabilising the climate. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr show, he said the ...
- NOAA’s ‘New Normals’ Climate Data Raises Questions About What’s Normalon May 15, 2021 at 2:05 am
When climatologists started standardizing global weather data about 100 years ago, they didn’t know that heat-trapping greenhouse gases were already pushing the planet’s climate inexorably in one ...
- MIT unveils a new action plan to tackle the climate crisison May 13, 2021 at 9:00 pm
MIT has released an ambitious new plan for action to address the world's accelerating climate crisis. The plan, titled ''Fast Forward: MIT's Climate Action Plan for the decade,'' includes a broad ...
- Climate Engineering - Daikin Service Center Gurgaon, Haryanaon April 30, 2021 at 5:00 pm
Climate Engineering is one of the well-known service centers you can visit for all your device related damages be it – air purifiers, air conditioners. We here have updated address, contact ...
- The Climate Debates: How Dangerous Is Solar Geoengineering?on April 16, 2021 at 8:05 am
We discuss some of the central issues: Is the climate crisis so far gone that we need to consider risky ideas like solar engineering? Is solar engineering a hubristic dream of techno-elitists or ...
- Climate Engineering and the Lawon April 3, 2020 at 11:39 am
Climate Engineering and the Law, edited by Michael B. Gerrard and Tracy Hester Cambridge University Press, 2018, 360 pp, £81.99 hb, $92 e-bk ISBN 9781107157279 hb, 9781108663397 e-bk. Transnational ...
- Climate Engineering and the Lawon September 29, 2017 at 5:09 pm
Frontiers of Engineering Management, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 38. Reynolds, Jesse L. 2019. Solar geoengineering to reduce climate change: a review of governance proposals. Proceedings of the Royal Society ...
via Bing News