Findings suggest new policy models and cost-cutting technologies could help nuclear play vital role in climate solutions
How can the world achieve the deep carbon emissions reductions that are necessary to slow or reverse the impacts of climate change? The authors of a new MIT study say that unless nuclear energy is meaningfully incorporated into the global mix of low-carbon energy technologies, the challenge of climate change will be much more difficult and costly to solve. For nuclear energy to take its place as a major low-carbon energy source, however, issues of cost and policy need to be addressed.
In The Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon-Constrained World, released by the MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) on September 3, the authors analyze the reasons for the current global stall of nuclear energy capacity — which currently accounts for only 5 percent of global primary energy production — and discuss measures that could be taken to arrest and reverse that trend.
The study group, led by MIT researchers in collaboration with colleagues from Idaho National Laboratory and University of Madison-Wisconsin, is presenting its findings and recommendations at events in London, Paris, and Brussels this week, followed by events on September 25 in Washington, D.C., and on October 9 in Tokyo. MIT graduate and undergraduate students and postdocs, as well as faculty from Harvard University and members of various think tanks also contributed to the study as members of the research team.
“Our analysis demonstrates that realizing nuclear energy’s potential is essential to achieving a deeply decarbonized energy future in many regions of the world,” says study co-chair Jacopo Buongiorno, the TEPCO Professor and Associate Department Head of the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department at MIT. He adds, “Incorporating new policy and business models, as well as innovations in construction that may make deployment of cost-effective nuclear power plants more affordable, could enable nuclear energy to help meet the growing global demand for energy generation while decreasing emissions to address climate change.”
The study team notes that the electricity sector in particular is a prime candidate for deep decarbonization. Global electricity consumption is on track to grow 45 percent by 2040, and the team’s analysis shows that the exclusion of nuclear from low-carbon scenarios could cause the average cost of electricity to escalate dramatically.
“Understanding the opportunities and challenges facing the nuclear energy industry requires a comprehensive analysis of technical, commercial, and policy dimensions,” says Robert Armstrong, director of MITEI and the Chevron Professor of Chemical Engineering. “Over the past two years, this team has examined each issue, and the resulting report contains guidance policymakers and industry leaders may find valuable as they evaluate options for the future.”
The report discusses recommendations for nuclear plant construction, current and future reactor technologies, business models and policies, and reactor safety regulation and licensing. The researchers find that changes in reactor construction are needed to usher in an era of safer, more cost-effective reactors, including proven construction management practices that can keep nuclear projects on time and on budget.
“A shift towards serial manufacturing of standardized plants, including more aggressive use of fabrication in factories and shipyards, can be a viable cost-reduction strategy in countries where the productivity of the traditional construction sector is low,” says MIT visiting research scientist David Petti, study executive director and Laboratory Fellow at the Idaho National Laboratory. “Future projects should also incorporate reactor designs with inherent and passive safety features.”
These safety features could include core materials with high chemical and physical stability and engineered safety systems that require limited or no emergency AC power and minimal external intervention. Features like these can reduce the probability of severe accidents occurring and mitigate offsite consequences in the event of an incident. Such designs can also ease the licensing of new plants and accelerate their global deployment.
“The role of government will be critical if we are to take advantage of the economic opportunity and low-carbon potential that nuclear has to offer,” says John Parsons, study co-chair and senior lecturer at MIT’s Sloan School of Management. “If this future is to be realized, government officials must create new decarbonization policies that put all low-carbon energy technologies (i.e. renewables, nuclear, fossil fuels with carbon capture) on an equal footing, while also exploring options that spur private investment in nuclear advancement.”
The report lays out detailed options for government support of nuclear. For example, the authors recommend that policymakers should avoid premature closures of existing plants, which undermine efforts to reduce emissions and increase the cost of achieving emission reduction targets. One way to avoid these closures is the implementation of zero-emissions credits — payments made to electricity producers where electricity is generated without greenhouse gas emissions — which the researchers note are currently in place in New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.
Another suggestion from the study is that the government support development and demonstration of new nuclear technologies through the use of four “levers” (i) funding to share regulatory licensing costs, (ii) funding to share research and development costs, (iii) funding for the achievement of specific technical milestones, and (iv) funding for production credits to reward successful demonstration of new designs.
The report includes an examination of the current nuclear regulatory climate, both in the United States and internationally. While the authors note that significant social, political, and cultural differences may exist among many of the countries in the nuclear energy community, they say that the fundamental basis for assessing the safety of nuclear reactor programs is fairly uniform, and should be reflected in a series of basic aligned regulatory principles. They recommend regulatory requirements for advanced reactors be coordinated and aligned internationally to enable international deployment of commercial reactor designs, and to standardize and ensure a high level of safety worldwide.
The study concludes with an emphasis on the urgent need for both cost-cutting advancements and forward-thinking policy making to make the future of nuclear energy a reality.
The Latest on: Nuclear energy
via Google News
The Latest on: Nuclear energy
- Is The Fear Of Nuclear Energy Justified?on July 24, 2021 at 8:00 am
Nuclear energy is often a polarizing subject, with many fearing the technology rather than embracing it, but it could pose a potential solution to mitigating the impact of climate change ...
- Nuclear power’s reliability is dropping as extreme weather increaseson July 24, 2021 at 6:00 am
With extreme weather causing power failures in California and Texas, it’s increasingly clear that the existing power infrastructure isn’t designed for these new conditions. Past research has shown ...
- China to activate world's first 'clean' nuclear reactor in Septemberon July 23, 2021 at 9:17 am
Plans for thorium reactors have been around since the 1940s, but Chinese scientists believe they are finally close to creating a working prototype.
- Author: Nuclear energy, not wind, is the way to goon July 22, 2021 at 5:53 pm
The nation’s first offshore wind farm to be built 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard was hailed by the Biden administration, but a better alternative would have been a nuclear power plant, ...
- First Energy Pays $230M Fine for Bribery in Ohio Nuclear, Coal Plant Bailouton July 22, 2021 at 5:49 pm
Ohio energy provider FirstEnergy Corp. has agreed to pay a $230 million fine for its role in bankrolling the $1.1-billion bailout of its own nuclear and coal plants in 2019. Federal attorneys filed a ...
- Can Talen Energy Nuke Its Capital Structure By Unrestricting the Nuclear Business?on July 22, 2021 at 1:40 pm
Xtract Research analyzes how Talen Energy could try to monetize its valuable nuclear asset by designating it an unrestricted subsidiary.
- Nuclear Energy Service Market Value Projected to Expand by 2027on July 20, 2021 at 1:57 am
Providing a successful marketing strategy is a major goal of any market research analysis. This Nuclear Energy Service market research report is of great help for the industry players as it helps them ...
- Bechtel, Westinghouse teaming up to pursue Polish nuclear energy projectson July 19, 2021 at 1:00 pm
Longtime U.S. nuclear industry contractors Bechtel and Westinghouse will team up to pursue new reactor plant projects in Poland. This news follows the U.S. Trade and Development Agency announcement on ...
- Iowa is ignoring the most efficient clean energy source — nuclearon July 19, 2021 at 10:14 am
Reliability is important because renewable plants are considered intermittent or variable sources and are mostly limited by a lack of fuel. Sometimes the sun doesn’t shine or the winds aren’t very ...
via Bing News