Many patients with neuropsychiatric disorders such as anxiety or depression experience negative moods that lead them to focus on the possible downside of a given situation more than the potential benefit.
MIT neuroscientists have now pinpointed a brain region that can generate this type of pessimistic mood. In tests in animals, they showed that stimulating this region, known as the caudate nucleus, induced animals to make more negative decisions: They gave far more weight to the anticipated drawback of a situation than its benefit, compared to when the region was not stimulated. This pessimistic decision-making could continue through the day after the original stimulation.
The findings could help scientists better understand how some of the crippling effects of depression and anxiety arise, and guide them in developing new treatments.
“We feel we were seeing a proxy for anxiety, or depression, or some mix of the two,” says Ann Graybiel, an MIT Institute Professor, a member of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research, and the senior author of the study, which appears in the Aug. 9 issue of Neuron. “These psychiatric problems are still so very difficult to treat for many individuals suffering from them.”
The paper’s lead authors are McGovern Institute research affiliates Ken-ichi Amemori and Satoko Amemori, who perfected the tasks and have been studying emotion and how it is controlled by the brain. McGovern Institute researcher Daniel Gibson, an expert in data analysis, is also an author of the paper.
Graybiel’s laboratory has previously identified a neural circuit that underlies a specific kind of decision-making known as approach-avoidance conflict. These types of decisions, which require weighing options with both positive and negative elements, tend to provoke a great deal of anxiety. Her lab has also shown that chronic stress dramatically affects this kind of decision-making: More stress usually leads animals to choose high-risk, high-payoff options.
In the new study, the researchers wanted to see if they could reproduce an effect that is often seen in people with depression, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorder. These patients tend to engage in ritualistic behaviors designed to combat negative thoughts, and to place more weight on the potential negative outcome of a given situation. This kind of negative thinking, the researchers suspected, could influence approach-avoidance decision-making.
To test this hypothesis, the researchers stimulated the caudate nucleus, a brain region linked to emotional decision-making, with a small electrical current as animals were offered a reward (juice) paired with an unpleasant stimulus (a puff of air to the face). In each trial, the ratio of reward to aversive stimuli was different, and the animals could choose whether to accept or not.
This kind of decision-making requires cost-benefit analysis. If the reward is high enough to balance out the puff of air, the animals will choose to accept it, but when that ratio is too low, they reject it. When the researchers stimulated the caudate nucleus, the cost-benefit calculation became skewed, and the animals began to avoid combinations that they previously would have accepted. This continued even after the stimulation ended, and could also be seen the following day, after which point it gradually disappeared.
This result suggests that the animals began to devalue the reward that they previously wanted, and focused more on the cost of the aversive stimulus. “This state we’ve mimicked has an overestimation of cost relative to benefit,” Graybiel says.
The study provides valuable insight into the role of the basal ganglia (a region that includes the caudate nucleus) in this type of decision-making, says Scott Grafton, a professor of neuroscience at the University of California at Santa Barbara, who was not involved in the research.
“We know that the frontal cortex and the basal ganglia are involved, but the relative contributions of the basal ganglia have not been well understood,” Grafton says. “This is a nice paper because it puts some of the decision-making process in the basal ganglia as well.”
A delicate balance
The researchers also found that brainwave activity in the caudate nucleus was altered when decision-making patterns changed. This change, discovered by Amemori, is in the beta frequency and might serve as a biomarker to monitor whether animals or patients respond to drug treatment, Graybiel says.
Graybiel is now working with psychiatrists at McLean Hospital to study patients who suffer from depression and anxiety, to see if their brains show abnormal activity in the neocortex and caudate nucleus during approach-avoidance decision-making. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have shown abnormal activity in two regions of the medial prefrontal cortex that connect with the caudate nucleus.
The caudate nucleus has within it regions that are connected with the limbic system, which regulates mood, and it sends input to motor areas of the brain as well as dopamine-producing regions. Graybiel and Amemori believe that the abnormal activity seen in the caudate nucleus in this study could be somehow disrupting dopamine activity.
“There must be many circuits involved,” she says. “But apparently we are so delicately balanced that just throwing the system off a little bit can rapidly change behavior.”
Learn more: Neuroscientists get at the roots of pessimism
The Latest on: Brain stimulation
via Google News
The Latest on: Brain stimulation
- Effects of transcranial static magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex on local and network spontaneous electroencephalogram oscillationson April 15, 2021 at 3:35 am
Transcranial static magnetic stimulation (tSMS) is a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique that reduces cortical excitability at the stimulation site. We investigated the effects of tSMS over ...
- Deep Brain Stimulation Devices Market 2021 : Market Size, Growth, Top Countries Data with Overview and Geographical Forecast Till 2026on April 14, 2021 at 8:07 pm
Global “Deep Brain Stimulation Devices Market" 2021-2026 Research Report provides key analysis on the market status of ...
- Electrical Stimulation Devices (ESDs) Market Estimated to Exhibit a Strong a 6.0% CAGR Between 2015 and 2023on April 13, 2021 at 9:22 am
TMR anticipates that the electrical stimulation devices (ESDs) market feature the highest degree of competition due to the presence of robust opportunities for growth on the global level. However, the ...
- Watch: UAE performs its first deep-brain surgeries on 4 Parkinson’s patientson April 13, 2021 at 8:03 am
The process involves implanting a small device into precise areas of the brain, and its function is similar to that of a heart pacemaker.
- Four Emiratis with Parkinson’s disease receive Deep Brain Stimulation surgeries in Abu Dhabion April 13, 2021 at 4:50 am
DBS surgeries at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi first to be offered in the UAE Abu Dhabi: Four Emiratis living with Parkinson’s disease have become the first to benefit from deep brain stimulation (DBS) ...
- Deep Brain Stimulation Devices Market Growth Prospects, Key Vendors, future to 2026 Scenario Forecast to 2026on April 12, 2021 at 12:34 pm
Request a sample Report of Deep Brain Stimulation Devices Market at: Global Deep Brain Stimulation Devices Market is valued approximately at USD 0.9 billion in 2018 and is anticipated to grow with a ...
- How AI Could Upgrade Brain Stimulation Therapieson April 12, 2021 at 10:10 am
The human brain, just like whatever you’re reading this on, uses electricity to function. Neurons are constantly sending and receiving electrical signals. Everyone’s brain works a bit differently, and ...
- Deep brain electrical neurofeedback allows Parkinson patients to control pathological oscillations and quicken movementson April 12, 2021 at 4:45 am
While pharmacological treatment and deep brain stimulation (DBS) reduce these pathological oscillations concomitantly with improving motor performance, we set out to explore neurofeedback as an ...
- Maryam Shanechi to lead brain research supported by new NIH awardon April 9, 2021 at 11:28 am
USC Viterbi writers follow a basic script when interviewing faculty about their work. One question we're always told to ask is "what are the next ...
via Bing News