Image: Frederic Bisson via Austrailian National University
Separating fact from fiction in the age of alternate facts is becoming increasingly difficult, and now a new study has helped reveal why.
Research by Dr Eryn Newman of The Australian National University (ANU) has found that when people listen to recordings of a scientist presenting their work, the quality of audio had a significant impact on whether people believed what they were hearing, regardless of who the researcher was or what they were talking about.
Dr Newman, of the ANU Research School of Psychology, said the results showed when it comes to communicating science, style can triumph over substance.
“When people are assessing the credibility of information, most of the time people are making a judgement based on how something feels,” Dr Newman said.
“Our results showed that when the sound quality was poor, the participants thought the researcher wasn’t as intelligent, they didn’t like them as much and found their research less important.“
The study used experiments where people viewed video clips of scientists speaking at conferences. One group of participants heard the recordings in clear high-quality audio, while the other group heard the same recordings with poor-quality audio.
Participants were then asked to evaluate the researchers and their work. Those who listened to the poorer quality audio consistently evaluated the scientists as less intelligent and their research as less important.
In a second experiment, researchers upped the ante and conducted the same experiment using renowned scientists discussing their work on the well-known US Science Friday radio program. This time the recordings included audio of the scientists being introduced with their qualifications and institutional affiliations.
“It made no difference,” she said.
“As soon as we reduced the audio quality, all of a sudden the scientists and their research lost credibility.”
As with the first experiments, participants thought the research was worse, the scientists were less competent and they also reported finding their work less interesting.
Dr Newman said in a time when genuine science is struggling to be heard above fake news and alternate facts, researchers need to consider not only the content of their messages, but features of the delivery.
“Another recent study showed false information travels six times faster than real information on Twitter,” she said.
“Our results show that it’s not just about who you are and what you are saying, it’s about how your work is presented.”
Learn more: What makes someone believe or reject information?
The Latest on: What makes someone believe or reject information?
via Google News
The Latest on: What makes someone believe or reject information?
- What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?on April 13, 2021 at 8:09 am
It states, in Derek Parfit's original formulation, For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality ... pioneering stage of population ethics research. We ...
- Stimulus Check Update: Here's What to Know if You're Claiming a Stimulus Check on Your Taxeson April 13, 2021 at 6:32 am
It’s how we make money. But our editorial integrity ensures our experts ... than 156 million of these payments and is continuing to steadily deposit money into people's bank accounts or mail out ...
- A zoologist imagines what alien life might look likeon April 13, 2021 at 6:30 am
On a celestial body with completely dark oceans, such as Saturn's moon Enceladus, our notion of evolution would support this method of communication, leading us to believe that aliens ... sociality, ...
- New NASA Administrator Should Reject Its Patriarchal and Parochial Paston April 13, 2021 at 12:14 am
NASA is a national asset that, if given the right incentives, can make meaningful contributions to sustaining ... technically advanced satellites that provide critical information about our home ...
- Study finds American increasingly divided into those who reject science, those who embrace science to build nuclear weaponson April 12, 2021 at 9:00 pm
The latest study on polarization by the Pew Research Center finds that Americans are increasingly divided into those who dangerously and baselessly reject the scientific ... polarized groups of people ...
- What White People Can Do Next Shows How a Postracial Society Is Possible in Our Lifetimeon April 12, 2021 at 11:40 am
Emma Dabiri's anticipated second book, What White People Can Do Next: From Allyship to Coalition, (available for preorder, out June 22) is for everyone who is ready to move forward from racism (yup, ...
- Florida evangelicals on vaccine: Right thing to do or mark of the beast?on April 10, 2021 at 2:55 am
People don’t social distance from me ... he said the movement’s anti-elitist roots make it easier for individual evangelicals to reject scientific information that’s inconvenient to their world view. ...
- Amazon warehouse workers reject union bid in Alabamaon April 9, 2021 at 2:03 am
Union organizers, meanwhile, stood outside the warehouse gates trying to talk to people driving in and out of work ... the status of Amazon’s founder Jeff Bezos as the richest man in the world makes ...
- Why the government should reject vaccine passportson April 1, 2021 at 5:30 am
“The Qantas Group acknowledges some people have concerns regarding vaccines. However, we believe we have a duty of care to everyone ... health verification,” it says on its website. Health information ...
via Bing News