via SUNO.edu
MANY FORENSIC METHODS HAVE NEVER BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED, SCIENTISTS NOTE IN EDITORIAL
Many of the “forensic science” methods commonly used in criminal cases and portrayed in popular police TV dramas have never been scientifically validated and may lead to unjust verdicts, according to an editorial in this week’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The authors were the six independent scientists who served on the National Commission for Forensic Science (NCFS), a panel set up in 2013 by the U.S. Department of Justice and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The NCFS was terminated early last year when the DOJ did not renewed its charter.
The scientists wrote their editorial as an appeal to the scientific community to help maintain the momentum in putting forensic science on a firmer scientific basis. The co-authors include colleagues from West Virginia University, Cornell University, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Brown University and the University of Arizona.
“We wanted to alert people that this is a continuing and a major issue: that many of the forensic techniques used today to put people in jail have no scientific backing,” says senior author Arturo Casadevall, MD, Bloomberg Distinguished Professor and the Alfred & Jill Sommer Professor and Chair of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Casadevall and colleagues argue in their essay that the problems with forensic science are rooted in the discipline’s traditional close association with prosecutors and law enforcement. “Almost all publicly funded [forensic] laboratories, whether federal, state, or local, are associated with law enforcement. At the very least, this creates a potential conflict-of-interest,” they note.
Traditional forensic methods aimed at linking suspects to patterns found at the crime scene—fingerprints, bite-marks, footprints, tire-marks—were developed by law-enforcement laboratories and matured largely outside of mainstream scientific culture. Once these methods became admissible in criminal cases they continued to be used in court by the principle of judicial precedent. Yet while fingerprint analysis recently has been reformed into a more quantified, objective, empirically based method, most other traditional pattern-matching methods continue to be used despite insufficient understanding of their accuracy and reliability.
“The forensic experts might claim, for example, that the fibers isolated from a body ‘match’ the fibers in a rug that was in the back of the suspect’s truck, but generally they won’t be able to say what the error rate in their conclusion is” Casadevall says. “In other words, they haven’t properly characterized the uncertainties involved in concluding that it is a match.”
A major catalyst for a re-think of forensic methods was DNA analysis, which entered widespread use in forensics in the 1990s and had an unprecedentedly high accuracy and reliability. DNA analysis overturned many convictions that had been based on traditional, less precise methods, and forced the recognition that these traditional methods were overdue for scientific scrutiny.
At the behest of Congress, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) convened a panel to study the problem, and in 2009 the NAS panel issued a report that was sharply critical of contemporary forensic science. The authors concluded that “with the exception of nuclear DNA analysis … no forensic method has been rigorously shown to have the capacity to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source.”
The NAS report also recommended the establishment of a research organization that would be dedicated to reforming forensic science and bringing it into mainstream scientific culture. The report urged that this entity be independent of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which understandably has little institutional interest in questioning older methods, since that could lead to the overturning of old verdicts.
In the end, though, DOJ prevailed. The NCFS was established to increase communication among academic scientists, judges, prosecutors, lawyers, and the forensic science community, but it was placed under the joint administration of the DOJ and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Following the 2016 presidential election, the winds shifted and DOJ declined to renew the commission.
“It’s a shame—we had been making a lot of progress,” Casadevall says. “Commissioners were realizing that in addressing these questions they might be able to improve their methods and the justice system.”
Casadevall sees little chance that the NCFS will be resurrected by the current administration, but he and his colleagues hope that by drawing attention to the problem, they can inspire the scientific and forensic communities to keep pushing for reforms, for example, mandatory empirical testing of all methods that are currently admissible in court.
“We’re hoping to keep the issue alive,” he says, “and we can see that a lot of otherwise educated and well-informed people still don’t understand the extent of the problem.”
Learn more: Scientists Decry Lack of Science in ‘Forensic Science’
The Latest on: Forensic methods
via Google News
The Latest on: Forensic methods
- Forensics report reveals details on pipe bombs left near U.S. Capitol in Januaryon March 5, 2021 at 10:31 am
A new forensics report released by the National Explosives Task Force is shedding light on pipe bombs that were placed in Washington D.C. a day before the deadly riot January 6th. CBS News senior ...
- New tool finds and fingerprints previously undetected PFAS compounds in watersheds on Cape Codon March 5, 2021 at 9:19 am
Researchers from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) found large quantities of previously undetectable compounds from the family of chemicals known as PFAS in ...
- Uncovering hidden forever chemicalson March 5, 2021 at 9:03 am
Researchers from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) found large quantities of previously undetectable compounds from the family of chemicals known as PFAS in ...
- Forensic analysis shows internal components of pipe bombs found outside RNC and DNCon March 4, 2021 at 10:27 pm
An unclassified document from federal investigators shows forensic findings and analysis of a pair of pipe bombs planted blocks from each other outside the headquarters of the Democratic and ...
- Pitt-Bradford to host online talk by forensic artiston March 4, 2021 at 2:53 pm
The University of Pittsburgh at Bradford will host an online artist talk Tuesday with Michelle Vitali, a working forensic artist and professor of art at Edinboro University.
- Network Forensic Market : Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 2021-2025 | Says Kenneth Researchon March 2, 2021 at 11:18 pm
Kenneth Research has published a detailed report on Network Forensic Market, which has been categorized by market size as well as growth indicators, and further encompasses detailed market analysis on ...
- Appeal as new DNA techniques link 2015 rape and sex assaulton March 2, 2021 at 4:05 pm
New DNA techniques - including those used in the World’s End murder trial - have been used to link a rape and sexual assault which happened within three weeks of each other in southwest Edinburgh more ...
- Campus lab: College students handle local forensicson March 1, 2021 at 6:28 am
The Digital Forensics Crime Lab has become "world class" in the years since it was first funded by the Utah State Legislature.
- How Miami’s Museum of Art and Design Censored Forensic Architecture and Retreated From Social Justiceon February 26, 2021 at 7:05 am
In hiring me to curate Forensic Architecture's first US survey exhibition, the museum mouthed the words of social justice but with the realization that those words would preface consequences, it began ...
via Bing News