The new study suggests that geoengineering in the northern hemisphere would reduce tropical cyclone activity, but also lead to increased likelihood for drought in the Sahel.
Proposals to reduce the effects of global warming by imitating volcanic eruptions could have a devastating effect on global regions prone to either tumultuous storms or prolonged drought, new research has shown.
Geoengineering – the intentional manipulation of the climate to counter the effect of global warming by injecting aerosols artificially into the atmosphere – has been mooted as a potential way to deal with climate change.
However new research led by climate experts from the University of Exeter suggests that targeting geoengineering in one hemisphere could have a severely detrimental impact for the other.
They suggest that while injections of aerosols in the northern hemisphere would reduce tropical cyclone activity – responsible for such recent phenomena including Hurricane Katrina – it would at the same time lead to increased likelihood for drought in the Sahel , the area of sub-Saharan Africa just south of the Sahara desert.
In response, the team of researchers have called on policymakers worldwide to strictly regulate any large scale unilateral geoengineering programmes in the future to prevent inducing natural disasters in different parts of the world.
The study is published in leading scientific journal Nature Communications on Tuesday, November 14 2017.
Dr Anthony Jones, A climate science expert from the University of Exeter and lead author on the paper said: “Our results confirm that regional solar geoengineering is a highly risky strategy which could simultaneously benefit one region to the detriment of another. It is vital that policymakers take solar geoengineering seriously and act swiftly to install effective regulation.”
The innovative research centres on the impact solar geoengineering methods that inject aerosols into the atmosphere may have on the frequency of tropical cyclones.
The controversial approach, known as stratospheric aerosol injection, is designed to effectively cool the Earth’s surface by reflecting some sunlight before it reaches the surface. The proposals mimic the aftermath of volcanic eruptions, when aerosols are naturally injected into the atmosphere.
In the study, the researchers use sophisticated simulations with a fully coupled atmosphere–ocean model to investigate the effect of hemispheric stratospheric aerosol injection on North Atlantic tropical cyclone frequency.
They find injections of aerosols in the northern hemisphere would decrease North Atlantic tropical cyclone frequency, while injections contained to the southern hemisphere may potentially enhance it.
Crucially, the team warn however that while tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic could be suppressed by northern hemisphere injections, this would, at the same time, induce droughts in the Sahel.
These results suggest the uncertain effects of solar geoengineering — a proposed approach to counteract global warming — which should be considered by policymakers.
Learn more: Artificially cooling planet “risky strategy”, new research shows
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Geoengineering: We should not play dice with the planeton October 12, 2021 at 8:30 am
To avert disaster, we must chart a different climate course, beginning this year, to achieve steep emissions reductions this decade.
- What is geoengineering? … and why it’s a ‘break glass’ planon October 8, 2021 at 4:11 am
Everyday wisdom tells us it’s much better to avoid a problem than to try to fix it afterward. That’s one reason cutting greenhouse emissions is by far the preferred option for limiting climate change.
- Democratizing the approach to geoengineering the climateon October 8, 2021 at 4:06 am
Yale University law student Lexi Smith sat for this Q&A with Law, Ethics & Animals Program editorial associate and interviewer Jack McCordick on ‘the promise and peril’ of geoengineering. Reposted ...
- View: Can geoegineering fix climate change?on October 1, 2021 at 10:03 pm
The trade-off between geoengineering and carbon removal depends on ones time horizon. The sooner cooling is pursued, the greater the environmental and social impacts of carbon removal.
- What’s the Least Bad Way to Cool the Planet?on October 1, 2021 at 11:31 am
To cool the planet in this century, humans must either remove carbon from the air or use solar geoengineering, a temporary measure that may reduce peak temperatures, extreme storms and other ...
- Geoengineering by Gernot Wagner review – a stark warningon September 30, 2021 at 2:59 am
Geoengineering is usually defined as large-scale interventions in our climate. Here, although Wagner refers briefly to carbon removal and natural climate solutions such as tree-planting ...
- Social Studies: The downside of publicly financed campaigns, the promise of geoengineering, what’s in baby nameson September 29, 2021 at 9:46 am
A new study adds baby names to this phenomenon. Over the last century in the United States, England, and Wales, as gender equality has increased, names that start with a softer, “unvoiced” phoneme — ...
- We Need to Talk About Geoengineeringon September 28, 2021 at 4:29 am
Although climate change is primarily caused by excess greenhouse-gas emissions, there are many links in the chain between economic activities and the real-world effects of planetary warming. All ...
- We need to talk about geoengineeringon September 26, 2021 at 5:00 pm
For all latest news, follow The Daily Star's Google News channel. Since then, many additional methods of "geoengineering" have been proposed by both scientists and science-fiction authors alike.
- Bleak as it seems, geoengineering may be the only way to save Earth from climate changeon September 24, 2021 at 10:04 am
Considering that Gernot Wagner is the founding executive director of Harvard University's Solar Geoengineering Research Program, you might imagine him as an archetypal detached scientist.
via Google News and Bing News
